Keskustelu:Book of Mormon/Evidences/Hebraisms/Chiasmus

The standard format won't work very well for this topic.

I am preparing draft comments on chiasmus. However, Chiasmus is a theory put forward by the LDS faithful and not by the critics. The critics then try and show that chiasmus is not effective as evidence for the authenticity of the text.

To this end, chiasmus needs to first be defined, its role in apologetics explored, and then the criticisms and a rebuttle to the criticisms presented.--BenMcGuire 07:38, 7 Oct 2005 (EDT)