FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Array
Ero sivun ”Keskustelu:Bob McCue/Quotes and Responses” versioiden välillä
(asking for an opinion about adding to McCue section) |
p (Talk:Self-contradiction moved to Talk:Bob McCue/Quotes and Responses: Making a subpage) |
||
| (2 välissä olevaa versiota 2 käyttäjän tekeminä ei näytetä) | |||
| Rivi 12: | Rivi 12: | ||
I think adding something like that middle part would be helpful for people who are reading this article and have never heard of McCue. Does anyone agree? Or at least agree that something like that should be added in, though not those exact words? | I think adding something like that middle part would be helpful for people who are reading this article and have never heard of McCue. Does anyone agree? Or at least agree that something like that should be added in, though not those exact words? | ||
* I think it gives McCue too much credit as worded. He's not well known except in a limited circle. McCue loves being important and the center of attention; I'd be reluctant to swell his head any further by calling him "premier." :-) I'd vote for something else, maybe something along the lines of: "The large volume of McCue's output is regarded as tedious by some, while some critics consider his work valuable?"[[User:GregSmith|Greg Smith]] 23:43, 13 Jul 2006 (MDT) | |||
Nykyinen versio 10. toukokuuta 2008 kello 13.03
The article says:
- Robert "Bob" McCue is a lawyer from Calgary, Alberta. A former LDS bishop, McCue has left the Church and now writes large amounts of material about his former faith.
Would it be appropriate to add something like:
- He is regarded as one of the premier anti-Mormons in Canada who's research on the subject of Mormonism is highly regarded by skeptics and antagonists.
And then move on to the rest:
- Sadly, McCue is not always straightforward with his readers. On occasion, he changes his claims to suit the needs of the moment. In addition, a comparison between the LDS doctrine which he taught before his apostasy, and LDS doctrine as he describes it after leaving the Church is instructive:
I think adding something like that middle part would be helpful for people who are reading this article and have never heard of McCue. Does anyone agree? Or at least agree that something like that should be added in, though not those exact words?
- I think it gives McCue too much credit as worded. He's not well known except in a limited circle. McCue loves being important and the center of attention; I'd be reluctant to swell his head any further by calling him "premier." :-) I'd vote for something else, maybe something along the lines of: "The large volume of McCue's output is regarded as tedious by some, while some critics consider his work valuable?"Greg Smith 23:43, 13 Jul 2006 (MDT)