Array

Ero sivun ”Keskustelu:Joseph Smith/Prophecies/Second Coming to be in 1890” versioiden välillä

Ei muokkausyhteenvetoa
Ei muokkausyhteenvetoa
Rivi 1: Rivi 1:
My interpretation of D&C Section 130 is that
My interpretation of D&C Section 130 is that
in D&C Joseph Smith says
in D&C, Joseph Smith says
   whether I should die and thus see his face (D&C 130:16)  
   whether I should die and thus see his face (D&C 130:16)  
which the prophet Enos makes a similar statement   
which the prophet Enos makes a similar statement   
   then shall I see his face with pleasure(Enos 1: 23)
   then shall I see his face with pleasure(Enos 1:23)
Which I believe the Lord was going to call Joseph Smith at age 85 to rest(die), but in the book of Alma it says  
Which I believe the Lord was going to call Joseph Smith to rest if he was still alive at age 85, but in the book of Alma it says  
   For the Lord suffereth the righteous to be slain (Alma 60:13)
   For the Lord suffereth the righteous to be slain (Alma 60:13)
and in D&C it says  
and in D&C it says  
   behold I grant unto you eternal life, even if you should be slain.
   behold I grant unto you eternal life, even if you should be slain (D&C 5:22)
D&C 5:22
and the Lord knew Joseph Smith was going to be murder(HC 6:546)
  and the Lord knew he was going to be kill HC 6:546


Who agrees with my interpretation?
Who agrees with my interpretation?

Versio 14. huhtikuuta 2008 kello 06.23

My interpretation of D&C Section 130 is that in D&C, Joseph Smith says

 whether I should die and thus see his face (D&C 130:16) 

which the prophet Enos makes a similar statement

 then shall I see his face with pleasure(Enos 1:23)

Which I believe the Lord was going to call Joseph Smith to rest if he was still alive at age 85, but in the book of Alma it says

 For the Lord suffereth the righteous to be slain (Alma 60:13)

and in D&C it says

 behold I grant unto you eternal life, even if you should be slain (D&C 5:22)

and the Lord knew Joseph Smith was going to be murder(HC 6:546)

Who agrees with my interpretation?