El Libro de Mormón

Tabla de Contenidos

El Libro de Mormón

bajo construcción

Book of Mormon basics

Sumario: What is the Book of Mormon? This article orients new readers to the nature and content of this volume of scripture.

Traducción del Libro de Mormón

Sumario: ¿Qué sabemos sobre el método utilizado para traducir el Libro de Mormón? ¿Fueron las placas a veces no en la sala mientras que José estaba traduciendo ellos? Se afirma que cada frase y palabra en el 1830 Libro de Mormón "supuestamente habían venido directamente de Dios."

Testigos del Libro de Mormón

Sumario: El mundo no se quedó con el testimonio de José Smith solo. El Libro de Mormón proporciona múltiples testigos oficiales y no oficiales que corroboran aspectos de account.Critics de José siempre han tratado de descartar o destruir el testimonio de los testigos. Esta página enlaza con páginas secundarias que discuten diversos ataques en detalle.

Urim y Tumim y piedras videntes

Sumario: José Smith utilizó los Intérpretes nefitas así como su piedra vidente (ambos de los cuales fueron más tarde se refirió a como "Urim y Tumim") para traducir el Libro de Mormón.

Author and proprietor listed as Joseph Smith

Sumario: Joseph Smith is listed as the "Author and Proprietor" of the first edition of the Book of Mormon. Critics use this to claim that Joseph wrote the book himself, despite that fact that the following page clearly states that he translated the book.

Attempt to sell Book of Mormon copyright in Canada

Sumario: David Whitmer claimed that Joseph Smith received a revelation and prophesied that Oliver Cowdery and Hiram Page should go to Canada where they would find a man willing to buy the copyright to the Book of Mormon. When they failed to sell the copyright, Whitmer states that Joseph admitted that the revelation had not come from God.

Printing timeframe

Sumario: "I've heard that the rate at which the first edition of the Book of Mormon was printed could only have occurred miraculously. Is there anything to this claim?"

Book of Mormon/Secular authorship theories

As a "familiar spirit"

Sumario: Critics ask why, if the words "familiar spirit" in Is. 29:4 refer to the Book of Mormon (as used in 2_Ne. 26:16, why does "familiar spirit" always refer to occult practices such as channeling and necromancy everywhere else in the Old Testament?

Textual changes

Sumario: The claim is often heard that there are more than 4000 changes to the Book of Mormon text. The majority of these are typographical. Few of the changes are significant. We examine the more noteworthy changes.

• • "the Son of" added to 1 Nephi 11:18, 1 Nephi 11:21, 1 Nephi 11:32, and 1 Nephi 13:40—
    Sumario: Critics charge that the earliest edition of the Book of Mormon referred to Jesus as "God," but in later editions this was changed to "the Son of God." They cite this as evidence that Joseph Smith changed the Book of Mormon to conform to his changing beliefs about the Trinity. They claim Joseph was originally a solid Trinitarian (perhaps even a Modalist), and as he later began to teach that the Father and Son were two separate beings, he had to change the Book of Mormon to support his new doctrine.
  • "or out of the waters of baptism" added to 1 Nephi 20:1—
    Sumario: The phrase "or out of the waters of baptism" was added to 1 Nephi 20:1 in the 1840 edition Book of Mormon by Joseph Smith.
  • "white" changed to "pure" in 2 Nephi 30:6—
    Sumario: The phrase "white and delightsome" was changed to "pure and delightsome" in the Book of Mormon. Critics accuse the Church of attempting to hide a racially offensive statement.
  • "Benjamin" changed to "Mosiah" in Mosiah 21:28 and Ether 4:1—
    Sumario: In the text currently found in Mosiah 21:28 of the Book of Mormon, the 1830 edition reads "Benjamin", while all subsequent editions read "Mosiah." Likewise, a reference to Benjamin in what is now Ether 4:1 was changed to "Mosiah" in 1849. It is claimed that "either God made a mistake when He inspired the record or Joseph made a mistake when he translated it."
  • "Words missing in Alma 32:30"—
    Sumario: Thirty-five words at the end of Alma 32:30 in the original manuscript were omitted from previous editions of the Book of Mormon. The text was restored in the 1981 edition of the Book of Mormon.

As the most correct book

Sumario: It is claimed that since Joseph stated that it was "the most correct book," that the Book of Mormon should not have contained any errors. Yet, Mormon himself states in the preface that any mistakes contained therein are the mistakes of men.

Contains the fulness of the gospel

Sumario: If the Book of Mormon contains the "fulness of the gospel," then why are certain ordinances such as baptism for the dead and eternal marriage not mentioned?

• • Baptism for the dead—why is it not taught in the Book of Mormon?—
    Sumario: If the Book of Mormon contains the "fulness of the Gospel," then why does it not mention baptism for the dead.
  • Book of Mormon condemns polygamy—
    Sumario: Critics use the Book of Jacob to show that the Book of Mormon condemns the practice of polygamy, and then go on to claim that Joseph Smith ignored this restriction by introducing the doctrine of plural marriage.

Arqueología

Sumario: Los críticos sostienen que lo que se sabe sobre la antigua arqueología americana no es consistente con el Libro de Mormón. Críticos sectarios suelen añadir la afirmación de que la Biblia ha sido "probada" verdadera por la arqueología, a diferencia del Libro de Mormón.

Anacronismos

Sumario: "Anacronismo" = sin tiempo, algo que no está en su contexto histórico. Los críticos apuntan a algunos elementos o conceptos en el Libro de Mormón que afirman que no son consistentes con lo que se conoce acerca de la antigua geografía americana, la historia o la antropología. Afirman que estos "errores" prueban que José Smith estaba produciendo el Libro de Mormón en el siglo 19, y que el Libro de Mormón, por tanto, no es un registro antiguo.

Deutero-Isaiah in the Book of Mormon?

Sumario: The "Deutero-Isaiah" theory is the claim that parts of Isaiah were written later than others. This theory claims that there were three individual authors, whose works were later compiled together under the name of the first author Isaiah (referred to as "Proto Isaiah"). The critical issue raised is that the Brass Plates of Laban quote from sections of Isaiah that this theory ascribes to Deutero-Isaiah, so how could the Nephites have these writings if they weren't written until after they left Jerusalem?

Dead Sea Scrolls and their relationship to the Book of Mormon

Sumario: Mistranslations of the King James version of Isaiah have been corrected using the Isaiah version found with the Dead Sea scrolls. Why is it that the quotes from Isaiah contained in the Book of Mormon have the same translation errors contained in the King James version instead of matching the original ancient text?

Demographics and population numbers

Sumario: Do Book of Mormon population numbers grow too rapidly?

Plain and precious doctrines

Sumario: It is claimed that the Book of Mormon is nothing more than a "bad copy of the Bible"; that anyone could have churned out such pedestrian, warmed-over ideas by borrowing liberally from the Bible and his own personal experiences.

Great and abominable church

Sumario: What is the "great and abominable church" referred to in the Book of Mormon? It is claimed that Latter-day Saints believe that the scriptural terms "church of the devil," the "great and abominable church," and the "whore of all the earth" refer to a specific religion. It is claimed that the Book of Mormon teaches that "all mainstream Christians fall into the world system know as the devil's church (or Satan's kingdom)."

Nephi's killing of Laban

Sumario: How can Latter-day Saints point to Nephi's killing of Laban as an example of a positive example of a Book of Mormon character? Wasn't this cold-blooded murder? And doesn't this passage then justify the killing of "the wicked" by anyone who feels that God has told them to do so?

Geography

Sumario: The geographical setting of the Book of Mormon has been the subject of serious study and casual speculation since before the book was first published. We describe the various theories and examine the strengths and weaknesses of each.

Location of the Hill Cumorah

Sumario: If Mormon chapter 6 is a literal description of the destruction of the Nephites by the Lamanites — approximately 100 thousand were killed by swords and axes — why hasn't any evidence of the battle been found at the site that was traditionally identified as the hill Cumorah in western New York state?

Calendar

Sumario: The Book of Mormon calendar is not identical to the calendar used by modern peoples. Learn about Nephite calendar(s) here.

• • Was the idea of a "week" unknown in the Americas?—
    Sumario: Despite claims to the contrary, there is evidence for a seven-day week among the early Maya, though the Book of Mormon does not require such a correlation.

Historicity

Sumario: Several efforts have been made to "prove" that what the Book of Mormon has to say about the history of the new world cannot possibly have been the case.

Warfare in the Book of Mormon

Sumario: Some criticisms of Book of Mormon warfare are anachronistic; other elements of Book of Mormon warfare contain authentic ancient elements about which Joseph Smith could not have known.

Evidencias

Sumario: La página Resumen de evidencias que apoyan el Libro de Mormón

• • Olivicultura—
    Sumario: ¿El Libro de Mormón el relato de la cultura de oliva en # 1 Jacob 5 coincide con lo que sabemos acerca de este tema?
  • Book of Mormon geography in the Old World—
    Sumario: A discussion of the Arabian, or Old World, geography of the Book of Mormon enjoys many advantages over discussion of New World matters. Chief among these is the fact that we know we certainty where the story begins—in Old World Jerusalem. The details of Lehi's desert travels had been extracted from the text by the 1970s. It is important to note how early these models were developed; current-day critics sometimes charge that LDS scholars have "retrofitted" their models to accommodate chance discoveries like "Nahom," but this is false.

Hebraisms in the Book of Mormon

Sumario: The Book of Mormon does indeed have authentic Semitic constructions in it, but LDS need to tread cautiously in establishing them. Each must be evaluated on its own merits. Hebraisms that could have been known to Joseph Smith may still be authentic, and may still enhance our appreciation of the text, but they are weak evidence for Book of Mormon antiquity.

• • Si-y los condicionales—
    Sumario: La primera edición del Libro de Mormón contiene varios ejemplos de una estructura gramatical no se conoce en Inglés, pero es común en hebreo: la llamada si / y condicional.
  • Nombres: auténticos nombres del viejo mundo en el Libro de Mormón
  • Chiasmus—
    Sumario: Una estructura literaria conocida como "quiasmo" existe en el Libro de Mormón. Algunos afirman que la presencia de quiasmo en el Libro de Mormón es ya sea una coincidencia, un artefacto del observador, o no es impresionante ya que se han encontrado ejemplos de patrones quiásticas en la Doctrina y Convenios, o la otra escritura del siglo 19.
  • Sami Hanna en el Libro de Mormón—
    Sumario: He leído un discurso escrito por el élder Russell M. Nelson, en la que discute un amigo suyo que tradujo el Libro de Mormón de nuevo en árabe. ¿Cuáles son los hechos detrás de esta historia y de la charla?

DNA evidence

Sumario: DNA samples taken from modern Native Americans do not match the DNA of modern inhabitants of the Middle East. Critics argue that this means the Book of Mormon's claim that Native Americans are descended from Lehi must be false, and therefore the Book of Mormon is not an ancient record as Joseph Smith claimed.

Lamanites

• • Curse—
    Sumario: It is claimed that the Church believed that Lamanites who accepted the Gospel would become light-skinned. "Mormon folklore" claims that Native Americans and Polynesians carry a curse based upon "misdeeds on the part of their ancestors."
    • Red skin curse—
      Sumario: One critic states that the Lamanites were "cursed" with a "red skin."
  • Referenced in the Doctrine and Covenants—
    Sumario: Since in the Doctrine and Covenants the Lord refers to American Indians in North America as "Lamanites" (e.g., DC 28:8-9,14, DC 30:6, DC 32:2, DC 54:8), does this cause problems for the Limited Geography Theory (LGT) or issues of Amerindian genetic data?
  • Relationship to Amerindians—
    Sumario: Are all Amerindians descendants of Lehi? It is claimed that Church leaders "seem reluctant or powerless to curtail" the belief among Mesoamerican and South American saints that they are descendents of the Lamanites. Critics say that Joseph Smith said that the angel Moroni told him that all American Indians were "literal descendants of Abraham," but that DNA has disproved this.
    • Statements—
      Sumario: A collection of various statements from Church leaders about Amerindian origins/identity
  • Relationship to Polynesians—
    Sumario: It is claimed that the Church has expanded the definition of "Lamanite" to Polynesians. Modern day prophets have repeatedly declared that Polynesians are Lamanites. The patriarchal blessings of Polynesians often state that they are of the tribe of Manasseh (through Lehi).
    • Statements—
      Sumario: A collection of various statements from Church leaders about Polynesian origins/identity

Wordprint studies

Sumario: What are wordprints? What do they have to do with the Book of Mormon?

Moroni's promise

Sumario: It is claimed that praying about the Book of Mormon is not an objective standard for determining if the book is true or not, and should therefore not be trusted. They claim that many people have read and prayed about the Book of Mormon and have either received no answer, or that they have received an answer from God that it is false.

Stick of Ephraim—Erastus Snow statement

Sumario: How is it that the prophesy of the sticks found in Ezekiel 37 is fulfilled in the Book of Mormon if Lehi and Nephi are descendants of Manasseh and not of Ephraim?