
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
1827 to 1830 | A FairMormon Analysis of Wikipedia: "Joseph Smith" A work by a collaboration of authors (Link to Wikipedia article here)
|
1838 to 1839 |
The name Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.. Wikipedia content is copied and made available under the GNU Free Documentation License. |
When Smith moved to Kirtland, Ohio in January 1831,
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 98–99, 116, 125 (Smith first lived with Newel K. Whitney in Kirtland, then moved in with John Johnson in 1831 in the nearby town of Hiram, Ohio, and by 1832 had secured a large estate in Kirtland).
his first task
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , p. 98 (citing LDS D&C 50 Phelps (1833) , pp. 119–23 as Smith's "first important revelation in Kirtland").
was to bring the Ohio congregation within his own religious authority
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 99–100 (stating that Smith "appealed as much to reason as to emotion," and referred to Smith's style as "autocratic" and "authoritarian," but noted that he was effective in utilizing members' inherent desire to preach as long as they subjected themselves to his ultimate authority); Remini (2002) , p. 95 ("Joseph quickly settled in and assumed control of the Kirtland Church.").
by quashing the new converts' exuberant exhibition of spiritual gifts.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , p. 99 (gifts included hysterical fits and trances, frenzied rolling on the floor, loud and extended glossalalia, grimacing, and visions taken from parchments hanging in the night sky); Bushman (2005) , pp. 150–52.
Rigdon's congregation of converts included a prophetess that Smith declared to be of the devil.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , p. 100 (noting that the prophetess, named Hubbel, was a friend of Rigdon's)
Prior to conversion, the congregation had also been practicing a form of Christian communism, and Smith adopted a communal system within his own church, calling it the United Order of Enoch.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 104–108 (stating that the United Order of Enoch was Rigdon's conception (p. 108)); Bushman (2005) , pp. 154–55; Hill (1977) , p. 131 (Rigdon's communal group was called "the family"); see also Phelps (1833) , p. 118 (revelation introducing the communal system, stating, "For behold the beasts of the field, and the fowls of the air, and that which cometh of the earth is ordained for the use of man, for food, and for raiment, and that he might have in abundance, but it is not given that one man should possess that which is above another.").
At Rigdon's suggestion,
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , p. 103 (stating that Rigdon suggested that Smith revise the Bible in response to an 1827 revision by Rigdon's former mentor Alexander Campbell).
Smith began a revision of the Bible in April 1831,
Author's sources:
- Hill (1977) , p. 131 (although Smith described his work beginning in April 1831 as a "translation," "he obviously meant a revision by inspiration").
on which he worked sporadically until its completion in 1833.
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , p. 142 (noting that though Smith declared the work finished in 1833, the church lacked funds to publish it during his lifetime).
Rectifying what Rigdon perceived as a defect in Smith's church,
Author's sources:
- Prince (1995) , p. 116.
Smith promised the church's elders that in Kirtland they would receive an endowment of heavenly power.
Author's sources:
- Phelps (1833) , p. 83; Bushman (2005) , pp. 125, 156, 308.
Therefore, in the church's June 1831 general conference,
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 111–13 (describing this conference as "the first major failure of his life" because he made irresponsible prophesies and performed failed faith healings, requiring Rigdon to cut the conference short).
he introduced the greater authority of a High ("Melchizedek") Priesthood to the church hierarchy.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , p. 111; Bushman (2005) , pp. 156–60; Quinn (1994) , pp. 31–32; Roberts (1902) , pp. 175–76 (On 3 June 1831, "the authority of the Melchizedek Priesthood was manifested and conferred for the first time upon several of the Elders." Annotation by Roberts gives an apologetic explanation.).
The church grew as new converts poured into Kirtland.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , p. 101.
By the summer of 1835, there were fifteen hundred to two thousand Mormons in the vicinity of Kirtland
Author's sources:
- Arrington (1992) , p. 21.
expecting Smith to lead them shortly to the Millennial kingdom.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 101–02, 121.
Though Oliver Cowdery's mission to the Indians was a failure,
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 110 (describing the mission as a "flat failure").
he sent word he had found the site for the New Jerusalem in Jackson County, Missouri.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , p. 108.
After he visited there in July 1831, Smith agreed and pronounced the county's rugged outpost
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , p. 162; Brodie (1971) , p. 109.
Independence to be the "center place" of Zion.
Author's sources:
- Smith (Cowdery) , p. 154.
Rigdon, however, disapproved of the location, and for most of the 1830s, the church was divided between Ohio and Missouri.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , p. 115.
Smith continued to live in Ohio but visited Missouri again in early 1832 in order to prevent a rebellion of prominent Saints, including Cowdery, who believed Zion was being neglected.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 119–22.
Smith's trip was hastened
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , p. 180; Brodie (1971) , p. 119.
by a mob of residents led by former Saints who were incensed over the United Order and Smith's political power.
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , pp. 178–79; Remini (2002) , pp. 109–10.
The mob beat Smith and Rigdon unconscious and tarred and feathered them.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , p. 119 (noting that Smith may have narrowly escaped being castrated over some perceived intimacy between Smith and the sixteen year old sister of one of the mob's instigators); Bushman (2005) , pp. 178–79 (arguing that the evidence for Smith's intimacy with the girl is thin). Bruised and scarred, Smith preached the following day as if nothing happened (Brodie (1971) , p. 120; 2002 , pp. 110–11).
The old Jackson Countians resented the Mormon newcomers for various political and religious reasons.
Author's sources:
- These reasons included the settlers' understanding that the Saints' intended to appropriate their property and establish a Millennial political kingdom (Brodie (1971) , pp. 130–31; Remini (2002) , pp. 114), the Saints' friendliness with the Indians (Brodie (1971) , p. 130); Remini (2002) , pp. 114–15), the Saints' perceived religious blasphemy Remini (2002) , p. 114, and especially the belief that the Saints were abolitionists (Brodie (1971) , pp. 131–33; Remini (2002) , pp. 113–14).
Mob attacks began in July 1833,
Author's sources:
- Vigilantes tarred and feathered two church leaders, destroyed some Mormon homes, destroyed the Mormon press, then the westernmost American newspaper, including most copies of the unpublished Book of Commandments. (Bushman (2005) , pp. 181–83; Brodie (1971) , p. 115.
but Smith advised the Mormons to patiently bear them
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 135–36; Bushman (2005) , p. 235.
until a fourth attack, which would permit vengeance to be taken.
Author's sources:
- Quinn (1994) , pp. 82–83 (Smith's August 1833 revelation said that after the fourth attack, "the Saints were "justified" by God in violence against any attack by any enemy "until they had avenged themselves on all their enemies, to the third and fourth generation.," citing Smith (Cowdery) , p. 218).
Nevertheless, once they began to defend themselves,
Author's sources:
- Quinn (1994) , pp. 83–84 (after the fourth attack on 2 November 1833, Saints began fighting back, leading to the Battle of Blue River on 4 November 1833).
the Mormons were brutally expelled from the county.
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , pp. 222–27; Brodie (1971) , p. 137 (noting that the brutality of the Jackson Countians aroused sympathy for the Mormons and was almost universally deplored by the media).
Under authority of revelations directing Smith to lead the church like a modern Moses to redeem Zion by power
Author's sources:
- Roberts (1904) , p. 37 (February 1834 revelation: "[T]he redemption of Zion must needs come by power; [t]herefore, I will raise up unto my people a man, who shall lead them like as Moses led the children of Israel,...and ye must needs be led out of bondage by power, and with a stretched out arm."); Brodie (1971) , p. 146 ("Quick-springing visions of an army of liberation marching triumphantly into the promised land betrayed his sounder judgment."); Hill (1989) , pp. 44–45 (suggesting that although members of the camp expected to do battle, Smith might have hoped they could merely intimidate the Missourians by a show of force).
and avenge God's enemies,
Author's sources:
- Smith (Cowdery) , p. 237 (December 1833 revelation: Smith must "get ye straightway unto my land; break down the walls of mine enemies; throw down their tower, and scatter their watchmen. And inasmuch as they gather together against you, avenge me of mine enemies, that by and by I may come with the residue of mine house and possess the land."); Quinn (1994) , pp. 84–85 (arguing that as of February 1834, the Saints were "free to take 'vengeance' at will against any perceived enemy").
he led to Missouri a paramilitary expedition, later called Zion's Camp.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 146–58; Remini (2002) , p. 115.
When the camp found itself outnumbered, Smith retreated and produced a revelation explaining that the church was unworthy to redeem Zion in part because of the failure of the recently disbanded
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , p. 141.
Author's sources:
- Roberts (1904) , p. 108 (quoting text of revelation); Hill (1989) , pp. 44–45 (noting that in addition to failure to unite under the celestial order, God was displeased the church had failed to make Zion's army sufficiently strong).
Redemption of Zion would have to wait until after the elders of the church could receive another endowment of heavenly power,
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 156–57; Roberts (1904) , p. 109 (text of revelation).
this time in the Kirtland Temple
Author's sources:
- Smith (Cowdery) , p. 233 (Kirtland Temple "design[ed] to endow those whom [God] ha[s] chosen with power on high"); Prince (1995) , p. 32 & n.104 (quoting revelation dated 12 June 1834 (Kirtland Revelation Book pp. 97–100) stating that the redemption of Zion "cannot be brought to pass until mine elders are endowed with power from on high; for, behold, I have prepared a greater endowment and blessing to be poured out upon them [than the 1831 endowment]").
then under construction.
Author's sources:
- Construction began in June 1833 Remini (2002) , p. 115, not long before the first attack on the Missouri Saints.
Zion's Camp was a major failure
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , p. 159 (describing it as Smith's "second major failure").
that stunned Smith for months
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , p. 328 (Smith was "stunned for months, scarcely knowing what to do.").
and resulted in a crisis in Kirtland.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , p. 160; Quinn (1994) , p. 87 (noting that in October 1834, Smith only gathered two votes in his failed election as Kirtland's coroner).
But Zion's Camp also led to a transformation in Mormon leadership and culture.
Author's sources:
- Quinn (1994) , p. 85.
Just before Zion's Camp left Kirtland, Smith disbanded the United Order
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , p. 141 ("In the Missouri debacle Joseph now saw a chance to erase the whole economic experiment—which in Kirtland had never yielded anything but trouble.").
and changed the name of the church to "Church of Latter Day Saints."
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 147–48.
After the Camp returned, Smith drew heavily from its participants to establish five governing bodies in the church, all of equal authority to check one another.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , p. 161 (The five equal councils were "the presidency, the apostles, the seventies, and the two high councils of Kirtland and Missouri").
He also produced fewer revelations, relying more heavily on the authority of his own teaching,
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 159–60 (comparing only 13 or so revelations after July 1834, several of them trivial, to the over 100 in the five years previous); Bushman (2005) , pp. 322, 419.
and he altered and expanded many of the previous revelations to reflect recent changes in theology and practice, publishing them as the Doctrine and Covenants.
Author's sources:
- Quinn (1994) , pp. 5–6, 9, 15–17, 26, 30, 33, 35, 38–42, 49, 70–71, 88, 198; Brodie (1971) , p. 141 (Smith "began to efface the communistic rubric of his young theology").
Smith also claimed to translate, from Egyptian papyri he had purchased from a traveling exhibitor, a text he later published as the Book of Abraham.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 170–75.
The Saints built the Kirtland Temple at great cost,
Author's sources:
- Remini (2002) , p. 116 ("The ultimate cost came to approximately $50,000, an enormous sum for a people struggling to stay alive.").
and at the temple's dedication in March 1836, they participated in the prophesied endowment, a scene of visions, angelic visitations, prophesying, speaking and singing in tongues, and other spiritual experiences.
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , pp. 310–19; Brodie (1971) , p. 178 ("Five years before...[Joseph] had found a spontaneous orgiastic revival in full progress and had ruthlessly stamped it out. Now he was intoxicating his followers with the same frenzy he had once so vigorously denounced.")
The period from 1834–1837 was one of relative peace for Joseph Smith.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 165–66.
Nevertheless, after the dedication of the Kirtland temple in late 1837, "Smith's life descended into a tangle of intrigue and conflict"
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , p. 322.
and a series of internal disputes led to the collapse of the Kirtland Mormon community.
Author's sources:
- Brooke (1994) , p. 221 ("Ultimately, the rituals and visions dedicating the Kirtland temple were not sufficient to hold the church together in the face of a mounting series of internal disputes," citing the failure of Zion's camp, the Alger "affair," and new theological innovations).
Although the church had publicly repudiated polygamy,
Author's sources:
- Hill (1977) , pp. 340–41 (noting that Smith confided to Brigham Young in Kirtland that "if I were to reveal to this people what the Lord has revealed to me, there is not a man or a woman that would stay with me.").
behind the scenes there was a rift between Smith and Oliver Cowdery over the issue.
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , pp. 323–25; Hill (1977) , p. 188 (noting that Benjamin F. Johnson "realized later that Joseph's polygamy was one cause of disruption and apostasy in Kirtland, although it was rarely discussed in public.").
Smith had by some accounts been teaching a polygamy doctrine as early as 1831.
Author's sources:
- Compton (1997) , p. 27; Bushman (2005) , p. 326; Hill (1977) , p. 340.
Sometime between 1833 and 1836, Smith engaged in a furtive relationship with his adolescent serving girl Fanny Alger.
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , p. 323 (noting that Alger was fourteen in 1830 when she met Smith, and her involvement with Smith was between that date and 1836, and suggesting that the relationship began as early as 1831). Compton (1997) , p. 26; Bushman (2005) , p. 326 (noting Compton's date and conclusion)
Although Cowdery claimed the relationship was a "filthy affair,"
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 181–82; Bushman (2005) , pp. 323–25; Smith (2008) , pp. 38–39 n.81 (questioning whether Smith and Alger were actually married; "a dirty, nasty, filthy affair,").
Smith insisted the relationship was not adulterous, presumably because he had taken Alger as a plural wife.
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , p. 325: Smith "wanted it on record that he had never confessed to such a sin. Presumably, he felt innocent because he had married Alger."
Cowdery, who was in the process of leaving the church,
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , pp. 323–25 ("In the contemporaneous documents, only one person, Cowdery, believed that Joseph had had an affair with Fanny Alger. Others may have heard the rumors, but none joined Cowdery in making accusations. David Patten, who made inquiries in Kirtland, concluded the rumors were untrue. No one proposed to put Joseph on trial for adultery. Only Cowdery, who was leaving the Church, asserted Joseph's involvement.")
was eventually charged with slander and expelled from the church.
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , p. 324: "In 1838, [Cowdery] was charged with 'seeking to destroy the character of President Joseph Smith jr by falsly insinuating that he was guilty of adultry &c.' Fanny Alger's name was never mentioned, but doubtless she was the women in question."
Emma Smith "suspected a relationship and threw Fanny out of the house."
Author's sources:
- Ostling (1999) , p. 60.
Building the temple left the church deeply in debt, and Smith was hounded by creditors.
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , pp. 217, 329 The temple left a debt of $13,000, and Smith borrowed tens of thousands more to make land purchases and purchase inventory for a merchandise store. By 1837, Smith had run up a debt of over $100,000.
After Smith heard about treasure supposedly hidden in Salem, Massachusetts, he traveled there and received a revelation that God had "much treasure in this city."
Author's sources:
- Quinn (1998) , pp. 261–64; Brodie (1971) , p. 192; Bushman (2005) , p. 328.
After a month, he returned empty-handed.
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , p. 328; Brodie (1971) , p. 193: "Joseph made no apology for this indiscretion. In his history he described the trip to Salem as an ordinary missionary tour, and the incident eventually was forgotten."
Smith then turned to wildcat banking, establishing the Kirtland Safety Society in January 1837, which issued bank notes capitalized in part by real estate.
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , p. 328.
Smith invested heavily in the notes
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , p. 328 (Smith "had bought more stock than eighty-five percent of the investors.").
and encouraged the Saints to buy them as a religious duty.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , pp. 195–96; Bushman (2005) , p. 334.
The bank failed within a month.
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , p. 330 (noting that business started on 2 January 1837, business was floundering within three weeks, and payment stopped on 23 January 1837).
As a result, the Kirtland Saints suffered intense pressure from debt collectors and severe price volatility.
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , pp. 331–32.
Smith was held responsible for the failure, and there were widespread defections from the church,
Author's sources:
- Bushman (2005) , pp. 332, 336–38. Richard Bushman notes that Heber C. Kimball claimed that in June 1837, not more than 20 men in Kirtland believed Smith was a prophet, but argues that this was an exaggeration, and that there were still "hundreds and probably thousands of loyal followers" during this time Bushman (2005) , p. 332.
including many of Smith's closest advisers.
Author's sources:
- The fallout included an unseemly row in the temple where guns and knives were drawn Bushman (2005) , p. 339. When a leading apostle, David W. Patten, raised insulting questions, Smith slapped him in the face and kicked him into the yard Bushman (2005) , pp. 332, 337, 339. Even stalwarts Parley P. Pratt and Orson Pratt left the church for a few months Bushman (2005) , p. 332.
After a warrant was issued for Smith's arrest on a charge of banking fraud, Smith and Rigdon fled Kirtland for Missouri on the night of January 12, 1838.
Author's sources:
- Brodie (1971) , p. 207; Bushman (2005) , pp. 339–40; Hill (1977) , p. 216 (noting that Smith characterized the warrant as "mob violence...under the color of legal process").
Wikipedia references for "Joseph Smith, Jr." |
FairMormon regularly receives queries about specific LDS-themed Wikipedia articles with requests that we somehow "fix" them. Although some individual members of FAIR may choose to edit Wikipedia articles, FairMormon as an organization does not. Controversial Wikipedia articles require constant maintenance and a significant amount of time. We prefer instead to respond to claims in the FAIR Wiki rather than fight the ongoing battle that LDS Wikipedia articles sometimes invite. From FAIR’s perspective, assertions made in LDS-themed Wikipedia articles are therefore treated just like any other critical (or, if one prefers, "anti-Mormon") work. As those articles are revised and updated, we will periodically update our reviews to match.
Editors who wish to participate in editing LDS-themed Wikipedia articles can access the project page here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement. You are not required to be LDS in order to participate—there are a number of good non-LDS editors who have made valuable contributions to these articles.
FAIR does not advocate removing any references from Wikipedia articles. The best approach to editing Wikipedia is to locate solid references to back up your position and add them rather than attempting to remove information. Individuals who intend to edit should be aware that posting information related to the real-world identities of Wikipedia editors will result in their being banned from editing Wikipedia. Attacking editors and attempting to "out" them on Wikipedia is considered very bad form. The best approach is to treat all Wikipedia editors, whether or not you agree or disagree with their approach, with respect and civility. An argumentative approach is not constructive to achieving a positive result, and will simply result in what is called an "edit war." Unfortunately, not all Wikipedia editors exhibit good faith toward other editors (see, for example, the comment above from "Duke53" or comments within these reviews made by John Foxe's sockpuppet "Hi540," both of whom repeatedly mocked LDS beliefs and LDS editors prior to their being banned.)
Although there exist editors on Wikipedia who openly declare their affiliation with the Church, they do not control Wikipedia. Ironically, some critics of the Church periodically falsely accuse Wikipedia editors of being LDS simply because they do not accept the critics' desired spin on a particular article.
Again, the answer is no. The truth is that Wikipedia is generally self-policing. Highly contentious articles do tend to draw the most passionate supporters and critics.
Although some LDS-related Wikipedia articles may appear to have a negative tone, they are in reality quite a bit more balanced than certain critical works such as One Nation Under Gods. Although many critical editors often accuse LDS-related Wikipedia articles of being "faith promoting" or claim that they are just an extension of the Sunday School manual, this is rarely the case. Few, if any, Latter-day Saints would find Wikipedia articles to be "faith promoting." Generally, the believers think that the articles are too negative and the critics believe that the articles are too positive. LDS Wikipedia articles should be informative without being overtly faith promoting. However, most of the primary sources, including the words of Joseph Smith himself, are "faith promoting." This presents a dilemma for Wikipedia editors who want to remain neutral. The unfortunate consequence is that Joseph's words are rewritten and intermixed with contradictory sources, resulting in boring and confusing prose.
We examine selected Wikipedia articles and examine them on a "claim-by-claim" basis, with links to responses in the FairMormon Answers Wiki. Wikipedia articles are constantly evolving. As a result, the analysis of each article will be updated periodically in order to bring it more into line with the current version of the article. The latest revision date may be viewed at the top of each individual section. The process by which Wikipedia articles are reviewed is the following:
The ability to quickly and easily access literature critical of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has been made significantly easier through the advent of the Internet. One of the primary sites that dominates search engine results is Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that “anyone can edit.” Wikipedia contains a large number of articles related to Mormonism that are edited by believers, critics, and neutral parties. The reliability of information regarding the Church and its history is subject to the biases of the editors who choose to modify those articles. Even if a wiki article is thoroughly sourced, editors sometimes employ source material in a manner that supports their bias. This essay explores the dynamics behind the creation of Wikipedia articles about the Church, the role that believers and critics play in that process, and the reliability of the information produced in the resulting wiki articles.
</noinclude>
We welcome your suggestions for improving the content of this FAIR Wiki article. |
Sites we recommend: |
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now