
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Summary: On July 31, 2020, critic John Dehlin was joined by Dr. Robert Ritner, an egyptologist at the University of Chicago and long-time critic of the Book of Abraham, to discuss the Book of Abraham and its authenticity. Dehlin and Dr. Ritner spent over twelve hours discussing different aspects of the Book of Abraham. This page was created as an index to all the major arguments made and to provide responses to claims that FAIR already had written material for. More responses will be forthcoming. Ritner spends most of his time criticizing the Book of Abraham generally but attempts character assassinations on Dr. John Gee of BYU and Michael Rhodes—former professor at BYU—and their scholarship on the Book of Abraham. This response will focus specifically on claims made about the Book of Abraham.
Thus we are reviewing the claims made in the following three episodes of Mormon Stories podcast:
Ep. 1: 92:16-92:25 - These fragments date between the third century BCE and the first century BCE long after Abraham lived.
Jump to details:
Ep. 1: 92:37-95:05 - The Church's own Book of Abraham essay says none of the characters on the papyrus fragments mentioned Abraham's name or any of the events recorded in the Book of Abraham. Mormon and Non-Mormon Egyptologists agree that the characters on the fragments do not match the translation given in the Book of Abraham.
Ep. 2: 5:20-6:16 - If there were post-biblical traditions of Abraham, you would expect to find a reflex of that in the continuing cultures in the Near East. They haven't forgotten everything. And the Abraham story is not only alive and kicking, it's predominant, it is more important than Moses in the current world of Egypt. And yet there is not one trace, not a scintilla, not any reflection of the Book of Abraham tradition, whereas the biblical tradition is extremely predominant. So one has to wonder, if there were a second story, why is it that it is not enshrined in living testimony when Abrahamic lore is so strong?
Summary: Neutral observers have long understood that this attack is probably the weakest of them all. One might reasonably hold the opinion that Joseph was wrong, but in the face of the documentary evidence it is wrong to argue that he and his associates were insincere or that they were practicing their religion only for power and to satisfy carnal desires. Those who insist that “sex is the answer” probably reveal more about their own limited perspective than they do of the minds of the early Saints.
Jump to details:
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
Fred Karger states that Latter-day Saints "didn’t allow blacks in the Church until 1978."
Author's sources:
- No source provided
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now