
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
(mod) |
(update to 9/3/2011 Wikipedia revision) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Section review {{WikipediaUpdate| | ==Section review {{WikipediaUpdate|9/3/2011}}== | ||
===Impact=== | ===Impact=== | ||
===== ===== | |||
{{WikipediaPassage | |||
|claim= | |||
Smith's teachings and practices aroused considerable antagonism. As early as 1829, newspapers dismissed Smith as a fraud. | |||
|authorsources= | |||
*{{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|pp=82–83, 88–89}} (describing the editorial reaction to the publication of the Book of Mormon); {{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|pp=16–17}}.</ref> Disaffected Saints periodically accused him of mishandling money and property<ref>{{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|pp=178–79, 247, 332, 336–40}}; {{Harvtxt|Remini|2002|pp=109–10}}; {{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|pp=207, 368–69}}; {{Harvtxt|Hill|1977|p=216}}; {{Harvtxt|Ostling|Ostling|1999|p=14}}.</ref> and of practicing polygamy.<ref>{{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|pp=323–25, 660–61}}; {{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|pp=181–82, 369–71}}; {{Harvtxt|Hill|1977|p=188}}; {{Harvtxt|Van Wagoner|1992|p=39}}; {{Harvtxt|Ostling|Ostling|1999|p=14}}. | |||
}} | |||
===== ===== | |||
{{WikipediaPassage | |||
|claim= | |||
Smith played a role in provoking an 1838 outbreak of violence in Missouri that resulted in the expulsion of the Saints from that state. | |||
|authorsources= | |||
*{{Harv|Bushman|2005|pp=345, 357, 365–367}}; {{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|pp=225–27}}; {{Harvtxt|Remini|2002|pp=133–34}}; {{Harvtxt|Quinn|1994|pp=96–97}}. | |||
}} | |||
===== ===== | |||
{{WikipediaPassage | |||
|claim= | |||
He was twice imprisoned for alleged treason, | |||
|authorsources= | |||
*{{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|pp=369, 547}}; {{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|pp=223, 248, 388}}. | |||
}} | |||
===== ===== | |||
{{WikipediaPassage | |||
|claim= | |||
the second time falling victim to angry militiamen who stormed the jail. | |||
|authorsources= | |||
*{{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|p=550}}. | |||
}} | |||
===== ===== | |||
{{WikipediaPassage | |||
|claim= | |||
Smith continues to be criticized by [[Evangelicalism|evangelical Christians]] who argue that he was either a liar or lunatic. | |||
|authorsources= | |||
*Richard J. Mouw, ''The Possibility of Joseph Smith: Some Evangelical Probings'' in {{Harvtxt|Neilson|Givens|2008}} at 189. | |||
}} | |||
===== ===== | |||
{{WikipediaPassage | |||
|claim= | |||
Despite the controversy Smith aroused, he attracted thousands of devoted followers before his death in 1844 | |||
|authorsources= | |||
*{{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|p=380}}. | |||
}} | |||
===== ===== | |||
{{WikipediaPassage | |||
|claim= | |||
and millions within a century. | |||
|authorsources= | |||
*{{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|p=15}}. | |||
}} | |||
===== ===== | ===== ===== | ||
{{WikipediaPassage | {{WikipediaPassage | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
He is widely seen as one of the most charismatic and religiously most inventive figures of American history. | |||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*{{Harvtxt|Bloom|1992|pp=96–99}} (Smith "surpassed all Americans, before or since, in the possession and expression of what could be called the religion-making imagination," and had [[charisma]] "to a degree unsurpassed in American history".); {{Harvtxt|Abanes|2003|p=7}} (noting that even Smith's harshest critics acknowledge his inventive genius); {{Harvtxt|Persuitte|2000|p=1}} (calling Smith "one of the most controversial and enigmatic figures ever to appear in American history"). | *{{Harvtxt|Bloom|1992|pp=96–99}} (Smith "surpassed all Americans, before or since, in the possession and expression of what could be called the religion-making imagination," and had [[charisma]] "to a degree unsurpassed in American history".); {{Harvtxt|Abanes|2003|p=7}} (noting that even Smith's harshest critics acknowledge his inventive genius); {{Harvtxt|Persuitte|2000|p=1}} (calling Smith "one of the most controversial and enigmatic figures ever to appear in American history"). | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 36: | Line 88: | ||
{{WikipediaPassage | {{WikipediaPassage | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
These followers regard Smith as a prophet and apostle of at least the stature of [[Moses]], [[Elijah]], [[Saint Peter|Peter]] and [[Paul the Apostle|Paul]]. | |||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*{{Harvtxt|Widmer|2000|p=97}}; {{Harvtxt|Shipps|1985|p=37}} (making comparisons with [[Moses]] (law-giver), [[Joshua]] (commander of the "armies of Israel"), and [[Solomon]] (king)); {{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|p=xx}} (describing Smith as "a biblical-style prophet—one who spoke for God with the authority of Moses or Isaiah."); {{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|p=vii}} (noting that "[i]n official Mormon biographies he has been made a prophet of greater stature than Moses"). | *{{Harvtxt|Widmer|2000|p=97}}; {{Harvtxt|Shipps|1985|p=37}} (making comparisons with [[Moses]] (law-giver), [[Joshua]] (commander of the "armies of Israel"), and [[Solomon]] (king)); {{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|p=xx}} (describing Smith as "a biblical-style prophet—one who spoke for God with the authority of Moses or Isaiah."); {{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|p=vii}} (noting that "[i]n official Mormon biographies he has been made a prophet of greater stature than Moses"). | ||
Line 46: | Line 98: | ||
{{WikipediaPassage | {{WikipediaPassage | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
Indeed, because of his perceived role in [[restoration (Latter Day Saints)|restoring]] the true faith prior to the [[Millennium]], and because he was the "choice | Indeed, because of his perceived role in [[restoration (Latter Day Saints)|restoring]] the true faith prior to the [[Millennium]], and because he was the "choice seer" who would bring the lost [[Israelite]]s to their salvation, | ||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*{{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|pp=72–73, 116–17}} (noting the "choice seer" prophecies in the [[Book of Mormon]] and Smith's [[Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible|revision of the Bible]]); {{Harvtxt|Smith|1830|pp=66–67}} (claiming that the [[Joseph ( | *{{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|pp=72–73, 116–17}} (noting the "choice seer" prophecies in the [[Book of Mormon]] and Smith's [[Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible|revision of the Bible]]); {{Harvtxt|Smith|1830|pp=66–67}} (claiming that the [[Joseph (son of Jacob)|biblical Joseph]] prophesied, "A seer shall the Lord my God raise up, who shall be a choice seer unto the fruit of my loins... And his name shall be called after me; and it shall be after the name of his father. And he shall be like unto me; for the thing, which the Lord shall bring forth by his hand, by the power of the Lord shall bring my people unto salvation."). | ||
|response= | |||
*{{WikipediaCorrect}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
Line 76: | Line 130: | ||
After his death, the Saints believed he had died to seal the testimony of his faith and considered him a [[martyr]]. | After his death, the Saints believed he had died to seal the testimony of his faith and considered him a [[martyr]]. | ||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*{{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971| | *{{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|pp=396–97}}. | ||
|response= | |response= | ||
*{{Detail|Joseph Smith/Martyrdom}} | *{{Detail|Joseph Smith/Martyrdom}} | ||
Line 87: | Line 141: | ||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*{{Harvtxt|Widmer|2000|p=98}}. | *{{Harvtxt|Widmer|2000|p=98}}. | ||
|response= | |||
*{{Detail|Joseph Smith/Status in LDS belief}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
Line 116: | Line 172: | ||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*Widmer 2000 98 | *Widmer 2000 98 | ||
}} | }} | ||
===== ===== | |||
{{WikipediaPassage | |||
|claim= | |||
Of all Smith's visions, Saints gradually came to regard his [[First Vision]] as the most important | |||
|authorsources= | |||
*{{Harvtxt|Smith|Mulholland|Thompson|Phelps|Richards|1839–1843|p=3}}. This vision was generally unknown to early Latter Day Saints. ''See'' {{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|p=39}} (story was unknown to most early converts); {{Harvtxt|Allen|1966|p=30}} (the first vision received only limited circulation in the 1830s). However, the vision story gained increasing theological importance within the [[Latter Day Saint movement]] beginning roughly a half century later. ''See'' {{Harvtxt|Shipps|1985|pp=30–32}}; {{Harvtxt|Allen|1966|pp=43–69}}; {{Harvtxt|Quinn|1998|p=176}} ("Smith's first vision became a missionary tool for his followers only after Americans grew to regard modern visions of God as unusual."). | |||
}} | |||
===== ===== | ===== ===== | ||
{{WikipediaPassage | {{WikipediaPassage | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
because it inaugurated his prophetic calling and character. | |||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*{{Harvtxt|Allen|1966| | *{{Harvtxt|Allen|1966|pp=43–44}} ("Next to the resurrection of Christ, nothing holds a more central place in modern Mormon thought than" the [[First Vision]].... The most sacred event in church history, a belief in its literal reality is fundamental to belief in [[Mormonism]] itself."); {{Harvtxt|Shipps|1985|pp=9, 32}} (First Vision came to be regarded as the "initial episode in Mormon history," and "emerged as a symbol that could keep the slain Mormon leader at center stage"); {{Harvtxt|Widmer|2000|p=105}}. | ||
|response= | |response= | ||
*{{Detail|Joseph Smith's First Vision}} | *{{Detail|Joseph Smith's First Vision}} | ||
Line 130: | Line 193: | ||
===Religious denominations=== | ===Religious denominations=== | ||
===== ===== | ===== ===== | ||
{{WikipediaPassage | {{WikipediaPassage | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
Smith's death | Smith's death resulted in further [[schism (religion)|schism]]. | ||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*{{Harvtxt|Quinn|1994|p=143}}; {{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|p=398}}. | *{{Harvtxt|Quinn|1994|p=143}}; {{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|p=398}}. | ||
Line 155: | Line 216: | ||
*{{Harvtxt|Quinn|1994|p=143}}. | *{{Harvtxt|Quinn|1994|p=143}}. | ||
}} | }} | ||
===== ===== | ===== ===== | ||
Line 215: | Line 275: | ||
*{{Detail|The Council of Fifty}} | *{{Detail|The Council of Fifty}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
===== ===== | ===== ===== | ||
{{WikipediaPassage | {{WikipediaPassage | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
Some of Smith's ordained successors, such as [[Oliver Cowdery]] and [[David Whitmer]], had left the church. | |||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*{{Harvtxt|Quinn|1994|pp=187–91}}. | *{{Harvtxt|Quinn|1994|pp=187–91}}. | ||
Line 233: | Line 291: | ||
*{{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|pp=556–57}}. | *{{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|pp=556–57}}. | ||
}} | }} | ||
===== ===== | ===== ===== | ||
Line 268: | Line 325: | ||
*{{Harvtxt|Quinn|1994|p=210}}; {{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|p=555}}. | *{{Harvtxt|Quinn|1994|p=210}}; {{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|p=555}}. | ||
}} | }} | ||
===== ===== | ===== ===== | ||
{{WikipediaPassage | {{WikipediaPassage | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
but Strang's following largely dissipated after his assassination in 1856. | |||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*{{Harvtxt|Quinn|1994|p=211}}; {{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|p=556}} (Strang followed Smith's example of producing revelations with a [[seer stone (Latter Day Saints)|seer stone]], saying an angel had ordained him, translating scripture from buried plates, having himself crowned as theocratic king, and practicing [[Mormonism and polygamy|polygamy]]). | *{{Harvtxt|Quinn|1994|p=211}}; {{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|p=556}} (Strang followed Smith's example of producing revelations with a [[seer stone (Latter Day Saints)|seer stone]], saying an angel had ordained him, translating scripture from buried plates, having himself crowned as theocratic king, and practicing [[Mormonism and polygamy|polygamy]]). | ||
Line 298: | Line 353: | ||
{{WikipediaPassage | {{WikipediaPassage | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
Many members of these smaller groups, including most of Smith's family, eventually coalesced in 1860 under the leadership of [[Joseph Smith III]] and formed what | Many members of these smaller groups, including most of Smith's family, eventually coalesced in 1860 under the leadership of [[Joseph Smith III]] and formed what was known for more than a century as the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (now [[Community of Christ]]), which now has about 250,000 members. {{As of|2010}}, adherents of the [[religious denomination|denominations]] originating from Joseph Smith's teachings number approximately 14 million. | ||
}} | |||
===== ===== | |||
{{WikipediaPassage | |||
|claim= | |||
In addition to churches in the Latter Day Saint movement, Smith is also accepted as a prophet by adherents of the [[Raëlism|Raëlian Church]]. | |||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
* | *Raël, ''Intelligent Design'', p. 89. | ||
}} | }} | ||
===Family and descendants=== | ===Family and descendants=== | ||
===== ===== | ===== ===== | ||
{{WikipediaPassage | {{WikipediaPassage | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
Smith | Smith wed [[Emma Hale Smith]] in January 1827. She gave birth to seven children, the first three of whom (a boy Alvin in 1828 and twins Thaddeus and Louisa on 30 April 1831) died shortly after birth. When the twins died, the Smiths adopted twins, [[Julia Murdock Smith|Julia]] and Joseph, | ||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*{{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|pp=110–11}}. | *{{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|pp=110–11}}. | ||
Line 328: | Line 386: | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
Joseph and Emma Smith had four sons who lived to maturity: [[Joseph Smith III]] (November 6, 1832), Frederick Granger Williams Smith (June 29, 1836), [[Alexander Hale Smith]] (June 2, 1838), and [[David Hyrum Smith]] (November 17, 1844, born after Joseph's death). | Joseph and Emma Smith had four sons who lived to maturity: [[Joseph Smith III]] (November 6, 1832), Frederick Granger Williams Smith (June 29, 1836), [[Alexander Hale Smith]] (June 2, 1838), and [[David Hyrum Smith]] (November 17, 1844, born after Joseph's death). | ||
As of 2011, DNA testing had provided no evidence that Smith had fathered any children by women other than Emma. | |||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*{{ cite article | title = Research focuses on Smith family | date = 2005-05-28 | work = [[Deseret News]] | url = http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,600137517,00.html }}; {{ cite article | title = DNA tests rule out 2 as Smith descendants: Scientific advances prove no genetic link | date = 2007-11-10 | work = [[Deseret News]] | url = http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,695226318,00.html }}; name=Perego>{{Citation | *{{cite article | title = Research focuses on Smith family | date = 2005-05-28 | work = [[Deseret News]] | url = http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,600137517,00.html }}; {{cite article | title = DNA tests rule out 2 as Smith descendants: Scientific advances prove no genetic link | date = 2007-11-10 | work = [[Deseret News]] | url = http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,695226318,00.html }}; name=Perego>{{Citation | ||
| last = Perego | | last = Perego | ||
| first = Ugo A. | | first = Ugo A. | ||
Line 351: | Line 409: | ||
{{WikipediaPassage | {{WikipediaPassage | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
Throughout her life and on her deathbed, Emma Smith frequently denied that her husband had ever taken additional wives. Emma claimed that the very first time she ever became aware of a polygamy revelation being attributed to Joseph by Mormons was when she read about it in [[Orson Pratt]]'s booklet ''The Seer'' in 1853. | Throughout her life and on her deathbed, Emma Smith frequently denied that her husband had ever taken additional wives. | ||
|authorsources= | |||
*''Church History'', 3: 355–356. | |||
}} | |||
===== ===== | |||
{{WikipediaPassage | |||
|claim= | |||
Emma claimed that the very first time she ever became aware of a polygamy revelation being attributed to Joseph by Mormons was when she read about it in [[Orson Pratt]]'s booklet ''The Seer'' in 1853. | |||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*''Saints' Herald'' 65:1044–1045 | *''Saints' Herald'' 65:1044–1045 | ||
Line 378: | Line 444: | ||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*{{Harvtxt|Van Wagoner|1992|pp=113–115}} As Fawn Brodie has written, this denial was "her revenge and solace for all her heartache and humiliation." (Brodie, 399) "This was her slap at all the sly young girls in the [[Joseph Smith Mansion House|Mansion House]] who had looked first so worshipfully and then so knowingly at Joseph. She had given them the lie. Whatever formal ceremony he might have gone through, Joseph had never acknowledged one of them before the world." Newell and Avery wrote of "the paradox of Emma's position," quoting her friend and lawyer Judge George Edmunds who stated "that's just the hell of it! I can't account for it or reconcile her statements." {{Harv|Newell|Avery|1994|p=308}} | *{{Harvtxt|Van Wagoner|1992|pp=113–115}} As Fawn Brodie has written, this denial was "her revenge and solace for all her heartache and humiliation." (Brodie, 399) "This was her slap at all the sly young girls in the [[Joseph Smith Mansion House|Mansion House]] who had looked first so worshipfully and then so knowingly at Joseph. She had given them the lie. Whatever formal ceremony he might have gone through, Joseph had never acknowledged one of them before the world." Newell and Avery wrote of "the paradox of Emma's position," quoting her friend and lawyer Judge George Edmunds who stated "that's just the hell of it! I can't account for it or reconcile her statements." {{Harv|Newell|Avery|1994|p=308}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 385: | Line 449: | ||
{{WikipediaPassage | {{WikipediaPassage | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
After Smith's death, Emma Smith quickly became alienated from Brigham Young and the church leadership | After Smith's death, Emma Smith quickly became alienated from Brigham Young and the church leadership. | ||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*Bushman | *{{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|p=554}} ("Emma's alienation from the main body of the Church began almost immediately."); {{Harvtxt|Brodie|1971|p=399}} (Emma Smith "came to fear and despise" Young); {{Harvtxt|Avery|Newell|1980|p=82}} (noting that Young later stated that "to my certain knowledge Emma Smith is one of the damndest liars I know of on this earth."). | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 395: | Line 457: | ||
{{WikipediaPassage | {{WikipediaPassage | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
Young, whom Emma feared and despised, was suspicious of her desire to preserve the family's assets from inclusion with those of the church, | |||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*Bushman | *{{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|p=554}}. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 403: | Line 465: | ||
{{WikipediaPassage | {{WikipediaPassage | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
and thought she would be even more troublesome because she openly opposed plural marriage. | |||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
*Bushman ( | *{{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|p=554}} ("Her known opposition to plural marriage made her doubly troublesome."). | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 411: | Line 473: | ||
{{WikipediaPassage | {{WikipediaPassage | ||
|claim= | |claim= | ||
When most Latter Day Saints moved west, she stayed in Nauvoo, married a non-Mormon, Major [[Lewis C. Bidamon]], | |||
|authorsources= | |authorsources= | ||
* | *{{Harvtxt|Bushman|2005|pp=554–55}}. Emma Smith married Major [[Lewis Bidamon]], an "enterprising man who made good use of Emma's property." Although Bidamon sired an illegitimate child when he was 62 (whom Emma reared), "the couple showed genuine affection for each" {{Harv|Bushman|2005|pp=554–55}}. | ||
}} | |||
===== ===== | |||
{{WikipediaPassage | |||
|claim= | |||
and withdrew from religion until 1860, when she affiliated with what became the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (now the [[Community of Christ]]), first headed by her son, [[Joseph Smith III]]. Emma never denied Joseph Smith's prophetic gift or repudiated her belief in the authenticity of the Book of Mormon. | |||
}} | }} | ||
Distinctive views and teachings | A FairMormon Analysis of Wikipedia: Mormonism and Wikipedia/Joseph Smith, Jr. A work by a collaboration of authors (Link to Wikipedia article here)
|
The name Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.. Wikipedia content is copied and made available under the GNU Free Documentation License. |
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia footnotes:
FAIR's analysis:
FAIR's analysis:
Wikipedia references for "Joseph Smith, Jr." |
FairMormon regularly receives queries about specific LDS-themed Wikipedia articles with requests that we somehow "fix" them. Although some individual members of FAIR may choose to edit Wikipedia articles, FairMormon as an organization does not. Controversial Wikipedia articles require constant maintenance and a significant amount of time. We prefer instead to respond to claims in the FAIR Wiki rather than fight the ongoing battle that LDS Wikipedia articles sometimes invite. From FAIR’s perspective, assertions made in LDS-themed Wikipedia articles are therefore treated just like any other critical (or, if one prefers, "anti-Mormon") work. As those articles are revised and updated, we will periodically update our reviews to match.
Editors who wish to participate in editing LDS-themed Wikipedia articles can access the project page here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement. You are not required to be LDS in order to participate—there are a number of good non-LDS editors who have made valuable contributions to these articles.
FAIR does not advocate removing any references from Wikipedia articles. The best approach to editing Wikipedia is to locate solid references to back up your position and add them rather than attempting to remove information. Individuals who intend to edit should be aware that posting information related to the real-world identities of Wikipedia editors will result in their being banned from editing Wikipedia. Attacking editors and attempting to "out" them on Wikipedia is considered very bad form. The best approach is to treat all Wikipedia editors, whether or not you agree or disagree with their approach, with respect and civility. An argumentative approach is not constructive to achieving a positive result, and will simply result in what is called an "edit war." Unfortunately, not all Wikipedia editors exhibit good faith toward other editors (see, for example, the comment above from "Duke53" or comments within these reviews made by John Foxe's sockpuppet "Hi540," both of whom repeatedly mocked LDS beliefs and LDS editors prior to their being banned.)
Although there exist editors on Wikipedia who openly declare their affiliation with the Church, they do not control Wikipedia. Ironically, some critics of the Church periodically falsely accuse Wikipedia editors of being LDS simply because they do not accept the critics' desired spin on a particular article.
Again, the answer is no. The truth is that Wikipedia is generally self-policing. Highly contentious articles do tend to draw the most passionate supporters and critics.
Although some LDS-related Wikipedia articles may appear to have a negative tone, they are in reality quite a bit more balanced than certain critical works such as One Nation Under Gods. Although many critical editors often accuse LDS-related Wikipedia articles of being "faith promoting" or claim that they are just an extension of the Sunday School manual, this is rarely the case. Few, if any, Latter-day Saints would find Wikipedia articles to be "faith promoting." Generally, the believers think that the articles are too negative and the critics believe that the articles are too positive. LDS Wikipedia articles should be informative without being overtly faith promoting. However, most of the primary sources, including the words of Joseph Smith himself, are "faith promoting." This presents a dilemma for Wikipedia editors who want to remain neutral. The unfortunate consequence is that Joseph's words are rewritten and intermixed with contradictory sources, resulting in boring and confusing prose.
We examine selected Wikipedia articles and examine them on a "claim-by-claim" basis, with links to responses in the FairMormon Answers Wiki. Wikipedia articles are constantly evolving. As a result, the analysis of each article will be updated periodically in order to bring it more into line with the current version of the article. The latest revision date may be viewed at the top of each individual section. The process by which Wikipedia articles are reviewed is the following:
The ability to quickly and easily access literature critical of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has been made significantly easier through the advent of the Internet. One of the primary sites that dominates search engine results is Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that “anyone can edit.” Wikipedia contains a large number of articles related to Mormonism that are edited by believers, critics, and neutral parties. The reliability of information regarding the Church and its history is subject to the biases of the editors who choose to modify those articles. Even if a wiki article is thoroughly sourced, editors sometimes employ source material in a manner that supports their bias. This essay explores the dynamics behind the creation of Wikipedia articles about the Church, the role that believers and critics play in that process, and the reliability of the information produced in the resulting wiki articles.
</noinclude>
We welcome your suggestions for improving the content of this FAIR Wiki article. |
Sites we recommend: |
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now