FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Array
Question: Why do Mormons typically refer to homosexual/gay/lesbian issues with such terms as "same-sex attraction"?: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:Having same-sex attractions, participating in same-sex relationships, and identifying as gay or lesbian are three separate things. A study by the Social Organization of Sexuality found that 60% of men and 68% of women who were attracted to the same gender have never engaged in homosexual behavior. This number differs from those who identify as gay, lesbian or bisexual. For them, only 13% of men and 4% of women have never engaged in homosexual behavior.{{ref|laumann}} This lead the researchers to conclude that sexual identity (i.e., how people label and conceive of themselves) was a stronger indicator of sexual behavior than sexual orientation (i.e., the feelings or inclinations which people have). | :Having same-sex attractions, participating in same-sex relationships, and identifying as gay or lesbian are three separate things. A study by the Social Organization of Sexuality found that 60% of men and 68% of women who were attracted to the same gender have never engaged in homosexual behavior. This number differs from those who identify as gay, lesbian or bisexual. For them, only 13% of men and 4% of women have never engaged in homosexual behavior.{{ref|laumann}} This lead the researchers to conclude that sexual identity (i.e., how people label and conceive of themselves) was a stronger indicator of sexual behavior than sexual orientation (i.e., the feelings or inclinations which people have). | ||
===Our true identity=== | |||
Elder Dallin H. Oaks noted a natural human tendency to use a single facet of our personality or experience as a large part of a self-definition: | |||
:I think it is an accurate statement to say that some people consider feelings of same-gender attraction to be the defining fact of their existence. There are also people who consider the defining fact of their existence that they are from Texas or that they were in the United States Marines. Or they are red-headed, or they are the best basketball player that ever played for such-and-such a high school. People can adopt a characteristic as the defining example of their existence and often those characteristics are physical. | |||
:We have the agency to choose which characteristics will define us; those choices are not thrust upon us. | |||
:The ultimate defining fact for all of us is that we are children of Heavenly Parents, born on this earth for a purpose, and born with a divine destiny. Whenever any of those other notions, whatever they may be, gets in the way of that ultimate defining fact, then it is destructive and it leads us down the wrong path.{{ref.oaks.1}} | |||
Some use a self-identity as "homosexual" to imply or argue that ''acting'' on homosexual desires is an inevitable or proper outcome, since it is simply "who I am." The Church teaches, rather, that our temptations, unhealthy desires, or sins do not define who we are as children of God. | |||
==Teachings of Church leaders== | |||
Church leaders have, therefore, consistently emphasized that such temptations and desires do not form a core or irreducible part of our nature. | |||
In 1978, Elder Boyd K. Packer said: | |||
:CITE | |||
In 1995, Elder Dallin H. Oaks noted: | |||
:We should note that the words ''homosexual'', ''lesbian'', and ''gay'' are adjectives to describe particular thoughts, feelings, or behaviors. We should refrain from using these words as nouns to identify particular conditions or specific persons. Our religious doctrine dictates this usage. It is wrong to use these words to denote a condition, because this implies that a person is consigned by birth to a circumstance in which he or she has no choice in respect to the critically important matter of sexual ''behavior''. | |||
:Feelings are another matter. Some kinds of feelings seem to be inborn. Others are traceable to mortal experiences. Still other feelings seem to be acquired from a complex interaction of “nature and nurture.” All of us have some feelings we did not choose, but the gospel of Jesus Christ teaches us that we still have the power to resist and reform our feelings (as needed) and to assure that they do not lead us to entertain inappropriate thoughts or to engage in sinful behavior.{{ref|oaks.2}} | |||
In 2007, Elder Jeffrey R. Holland taught: | |||
:CITE | |||
=={{Conclusion label}}== | =={{Conclusion label}}== | ||
LDS doctrine emphasizes that people are not the sum of their desires, temptations, or sins. Secular evidence suggests that those who self-identify with their desires in this way are more likely to engage in acts which the gospel of Christ teaches are sinful. FAIR wishes to support members and non-members in choosing to live lives in harmony with God's commandments. | |||
Our choice of terminology should not be construed to deny others the privilege of choosing their own acts or self-labels. When labels such as "homosexual," "gay," or "lesbian" are used by FAIR, this terminology should be understood to: | |||
* reflect the self-understanding of those referred to; ''or'' | |||
* serve as an adjective (e.g., "gay activists" are those working politically on behalf of those who self-identify as gay). | |||
=={{Endnotes label}}== | =={{Endnotes label}}== | ||
#{{note|proc.1}} {{Periodical:Church:Family Proclamation}} | #{{note|proc.1}} {{Periodical:Church:Family Proclamation}} | ||
#{{note|apa1}} {{nc}} | |||
#{{note|laumann}}{{cite book | |||
|title=The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States | |||
|last=Laumann | |||
|first=Edward O. | |||
|date=1994 | |||
|publisher=University of Chicago Press | |||
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=72AHO0rE2HoC&pg=PA4&lpg=PA4&dq=the+social+organization+of+sexuality+1990&source=web&ots=kHfFtQQH7j&sig=ZS5sk4GqzcR4e8mLVIHTNPsHt-Y#PPA299,M1 | |||
|pages=299}} | |||
#{{note|oaks.1}} {{Periodical:Oaks Wickman:Same Gender Attraction:2006}} | |||
#{{note|oaks.2}} {{Ensign1|author=Dallin H. Oaks|article=[http://lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?hideNav=true&locale=0&sourceId=43786e9ce9b1c010VgnVCM1000004d82620a____&vgnextoid=2354fccf2b7db010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD#29 Same-Gender Attraction]|date=October 2007|pages=9}} | |||
=={{Further reading label}}== | =={{Further reading label}}== | ||
Revision as of 21:42, 14 November 2010
This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.
Questions
==
Why does FAIR (and other LDS sources) typically refer to homosexual/gay/lesbian issues with such terms as "same-sex attraction," "same-gender attraction," etc.?
==Detailed Analysis
==
The language used to describe people or phenomena can influence how we perceive or think about such matters.
LDS doctrine teaches that "Gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose."[1] Marriage between a husband and wife, and sealing into eternal family units is the foundation of heaven in LDS theology, and Church leaders have repeatedly taught that no child of God will bear the burden of erotic desire for the opposite sex after death.
Attraction to members of the same sex, like all temptation, is not a sin. Sin only occurs when we encourage or seek out such attraction, or act upon it.
- According to the American Psychological Association: "Sexual orientation is different from sexual behavior because it refers to feelings and self-concept. Individuals may or may not express their sexual orientation in their behaviors."[2]
- Having same-sex attractions, participating in same-sex relationships, and identifying as gay or lesbian are three separate things. A study by the Social Organization of Sexuality found that 60% of men and 68% of women who were attracted to the same gender have never engaged in homosexual behavior. This number differs from those who identify as gay, lesbian or bisexual. For them, only 13% of men and 4% of women have never engaged in homosexual behavior.[3] This lead the researchers to conclude that sexual identity (i.e., how people label and conceive of themselves) was a stronger indicator of sexual behavior than sexual orientation (i.e., the feelings or inclinations which people have).
Our true identity
Elder Dallin H. Oaks noted a natural human tendency to use a single facet of our personality or experience as a large part of a self-definition:
- I think it is an accurate statement to say that some people consider feelings of same-gender attraction to be the defining fact of their existence. There are also people who consider the defining fact of their existence that they are from Texas or that they were in the United States Marines. Or they are red-headed, or they are the best basketball player that ever played for such-and-such a high school. People can adopt a characteristic as the defining example of their existence and often those characteristics are physical.
- We have the agency to choose which characteristics will define us; those choices are not thrust upon us.
- The ultimate defining fact for all of us is that we are children of Heavenly Parents, born on this earth for a purpose, and born with a divine destiny. Whenever any of those other notions, whatever they may be, gets in the way of that ultimate defining fact, then it is destructive and it leads us down the wrong path.Template:Ref.oaks.1
Some use a self-identity as "homosexual" to imply or argue that acting on homosexual desires is an inevitable or proper outcome, since it is simply "who I am." The Church teaches, rather, that our temptations, unhealthy desires, or sins do not define who we are as children of God.
Teachings of Church leaders
Church leaders have, therefore, consistently emphasized that such temptations and desires do not form a core or irreducible part of our nature.
In 1978, Elder Boyd K. Packer said:
- CITE
In 1995, Elder Dallin H. Oaks noted:
- We should note that the words homosexual, lesbian, and gay are adjectives to describe particular thoughts, feelings, or behaviors. We should refrain from using these words as nouns to identify particular conditions or specific persons. Our religious doctrine dictates this usage. It is wrong to use these words to denote a condition, because this implies that a person is consigned by birth to a circumstance in which he or she has no choice in respect to the critically important matter of sexual behavior.
- Feelings are another matter. Some kinds of feelings seem to be inborn. Others are traceable to mortal experiences. Still other feelings seem to be acquired from a complex interaction of “nature and nurture.” All of us have some feelings we did not choose, but the gospel of Jesus Christ teaches us that we still have the power to resist and reform our feelings (as needed) and to assure that they do not lead us to entertain inappropriate thoughts or to engage in sinful behavior.[4]
In 2007, Elder Jeffrey R. Holland taught:
- CITE
Answer
==
LDS doctrine emphasizes that people are not the sum of their desires, temptations, or sins. Secular evidence suggests that those who self-identify with their desires in this way are more likely to engage in acts which the gospel of Christ teaches are sinful. FAIR wishes to support members and non-members in choosing to live lives in harmony with God's commandments.
Our choice of terminology should not be construed to deny others the privilege of choosing their own acts or self-labels. When labels such as "homosexual," "gay," or "lesbian" are used by FAIR, this terminology should be understood to:
- reflect the self-understanding of those referred to; or
- serve as an adjective (e.g., "gay activists" are those working politically on behalf of those who self-identify as gay).
== Notes ==
- [note] The First Presidency and Council of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint, The Family: A Proclamation to the World (first presented 23 September 1995).
- [note] [citation needed]
- [note] Laumann, Edward O. , The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States 299
- [note] Dallin H. Oaks and Lance B. Wickman, "Same Gender Attraction," interview with Church Public Affairs (2006). off-site
- [note] Dallin H. Oaks, "Same-Gender Attraction," Ensign (October 2007): 9.
Further reading
FairMormon Answers articles
FairMormon web site
External links
Printed material