Array

Book of Mormon/Early reactions to: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
==No intelligent person could believe it==
==No intelligent person could believe it==


{{Main|/No intelligent person|l1=No intelligent person could believe the Book of Mormon do be divine}}
{{Main|/No intelligent person|l1=No intelligent person could believe the Book of Mormon to be divine}}


==Sidney Rigdon==
==Sidney Rigdon==

Revision as of 07:46, 20 April 2010

Answers portal
Book of Mormon
    RESOURCES

General information:

Book of Mormon & Bible:

Criticisms:

    PERSPECTIVES
    MEDIA
    OTHER PORTALS

This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.

Early reactions to the Book of Mormon

The Book of Mormon was met by a storm of criticism from early critics. This page archives examples of these early responses.

"Adding to or taking away"

Main article: Bible forbids "adding to or taking away" from God's word

Blasphemy

Main article: New revelation is blasmphemous or unnecessary

Clumsy or obvious forgery

Main article: Book of Mormon is a clumsy or obvious forgery

Difficult to explain before the Spalding theory

Main article: Difficult to explain Book of Mormon before Spalding theory

Joseph Smith clearly the author

Main article: Joseph Smith the obvious author

Joseph Smith clearly not the author

Main article: Joseph Smith obviously not the author

Heretical

Main article: The existence of the Book of Mormon marks members of the Church as Christian heretics

No intelligent person could believe it

Main article: No intelligent person could believe the Book of Mormon to be divine

Sidney Rigdon

Main article: Sidney Rigdon had major role in authorship

Spalding theory

Main article: Spalding theory
Retrieved from "http://104.237.154.152/answers/index.php?title=Book_of_Mormon/Early_reactions_to&oldid=61123"