FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Array
Relationship between the temple endowment and Freemasonry: Difference between revisions
MatthewBrown (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
MatthewBrown (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Response== | ==Response== | ||
Joseph Smith was initiated as a Freemason on the 15th and 16th of March 1842. But previously, on the 19th of Janaury 1841, the Lord | Joseph Smith was initiated as a Freemason on the 15th and 16th of March 1842. But previously, on the 19th of Janaury 1841, the Lord issued a revelation wherein He stated that He was going to "restore again," through Joseph Smith, the "lost" ordinances which had once been practiced in the Tabernacle built by Moses and the house built in the land of promise -- meaning the temple of Solomon (D&C 124:28, 38). The Lord also provided a list within this revealtion of many ritual elements that would eventually be practiced inside of the Nauvoo Temple. Some of the elements mentioned in this revelation are the same ones that Joseph Smith is accused of plagiarizing from the Freemasons.[1] | ||
A detailed look at LDS Church history before the 15th and 16th of March 1842 reveals that Joseph Smith and some of his collegues were well aware of a number of Nauvoo-style temple ritual items early on - including ideology, vestments, actions, forms, language, and architecture. Knowledge of many of these things even predated the revelation given on 19 January 1841 (D&C 124).[2] A careful look at the pre-1842 scriptural texts produced through Joseph Smith's instrumentality is also very instructive because they include a wealth of information connected with the rites that would be introduced among the Saints during the Nauvoo period.[3] | A detailed look at LDS Church history before the 15th and 16th of March 1842 reveals that Joseph Smith and some of his collegues were well aware of a number of Nauvoo-style temple ritual items early on - including ideology, vestments, actions, forms, language, and architecture. Knowledge of many of these things even predated the revelation given on 19 January 1841 (D&C 124).[2] A careful look at the pre-1842 scriptural texts produced through Joseph Smith's instrumentality is also very instructive because they include a wealth of information connected with the rites that would be introduced among the Saints during the Nauvoo period.[3] | ||
Joseph Smith and other nineteenth century Mormons had a definite stance on why there were similarities between the initiation rituals of the respective groups. They taught that there was an original "Priesthood" source of divinely-determined ceremonies: the Masons derived their system from degenerated branches of this source while pristine material was restored to the Latter-day Saints.[4] A comparison between the lodges and rituals of the Freemasons with the architecture and ceremonies of orthodox Christianity show that there is a definite connection between them and thus the stance of Joseph Smith and his contemporaries is verifiable. | |||
Another thing that needs to be taken into consideration about the 'Mormonism/Masonry' issue is that depsite the claims of some people the origin of Masonic patterns (lodge make-up and arrangement) and ritual can be readily determined. Several Masonic historians have pointed out the striking parallels between what they do and what the orthodox Christians have done for a very long time. These correspondences correlate very well with what Joseph Smith and other nineteenth century Mormons said about the origin of Freemasonry. | Another thing that needs to be taken into consideration about the 'Mormonism/Masonry' issue is that depsite the claims of some people the origin of Masonic patterns (lodge make-up and arrangement) and ritual can be readily determined. Several Masonic historians have pointed out the striking parallels between what they do and what the orthodox Christians have done for a very long time. These correspondences correlate very well with what Joseph Smith and other nineteenth century Mormons said about the origin of Freemasonry. | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
[3] Material in the D&C, the JST and the books of Mormon, Abraham, and Moses demonstrate that Joseph Smith had a great deal of Nauvoo-style temple ideology available to him long before a Masonic lodge was established in Nauvoo. | [3] Material in the D&C, the JST and the books of Mormon, Abraham, and Moses demonstrate that Joseph Smith had a great deal of Nauvoo-style temple ideology available to him long before a Masonic lodge was established in Nauvoo. | ||
http://en.fairmormon.org/Freemasonry_Origins | [4] For statements reflecting this stance see - http://en.fairmormon.org/Freemasonry_Origins | ||
==Further Reading== | ==Further Reading== | ||
Revision as of 22:42, 31 December 2009
| Answers portal |
| Temples |
|
 RESOURCES
|
|---|
|
General:
Endowment: Masonry: |
 PERSPECTIVES
|
 MEDIA
|
| OTHER PORTALS
|
Important note: Members of FAIR take their temple covenants seriously. We consider the temple teachings to be sacred, and will not discuss their specifics in a public forum.
Claim
Some critics of Mormonism see similarities between the rites of Freemasonry and LDS temple ceremonies and assume that since Joseph Smith was initiated as a Freemason shortly before he introduced the Nauvoo-style endowment he must have plagiarized elements of the Masonic rituals. This viewpoint leads them, in turn, to conclude that the LDS endowment is nothing but a variant form of Masonic initiation and therefore not from a divine source.
To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, [[../CriticalSources|click here]]
Response
Joseph Smith was initiated as a Freemason on the 15th and 16th of March 1842. But previously, on the 19th of Janaury 1841, the Lord issued a revelation wherein He stated that He was going to "restore again," through Joseph Smith, the "lost" ordinances which had once been practiced in the Tabernacle built by Moses and the house built in the land of promise -- meaning the temple of Solomon (D&C 124:28, 38). The Lord also provided a list within this revealtion of many ritual elements that would eventually be practiced inside of the Nauvoo Temple. Some of the elements mentioned in this revelation are the same ones that Joseph Smith is accused of plagiarizing from the Freemasons.[1]
A detailed look at LDS Church history before the 15th and 16th of March 1842 reveals that Joseph Smith and some of his collegues were well aware of a number of Nauvoo-style temple ritual items early on - including ideology, vestments, actions, forms, language, and architecture. Knowledge of many of these things even predated the revelation given on 19 January 1841 (D&C 124).[2] A careful look at the pre-1842 scriptural texts produced through Joseph Smith's instrumentality is also very instructive because they include a wealth of information connected with the rites that would be introduced among the Saints during the Nauvoo period.[3]
Joseph Smith and other nineteenth century Mormons had a definite stance on why there were similarities between the initiation rituals of the respective groups. They taught that there was an original "Priesthood" source of divinely-determined ceremonies: the Masons derived their system from degenerated branches of this source while pristine material was restored to the Latter-day Saints.[4] A comparison between the lodges and rituals of the Freemasons with the architecture and ceremonies of orthodox Christianity show that there is a definite connection between them and thus the stance of Joseph Smith and his contemporaries is verifiable.
Another thing that needs to be taken into consideration about the 'Mormonism/Masonry' issue is that depsite the claims of some people the origin of Masonic patterns (lodge make-up and arrangement) and ritual can be readily determined. Several Masonic historians have pointed out the striking parallels between what they do and what the orthodox Christians have done for a very long time. These correspondences correlate very well with what Joseph Smith and other nineteenth century Mormons said about the origin of Freemasonry.
Endnotes
[1] There are several places in D&C 124 where elements of the temple rites are mentioned. For an analysis of the content of section 124 of the Doctrine and Covenants and its connection to the temples of ancient Israel see the following article - http://www.templestudy.com/2009/09/27/lord-speaks-ancient-temple-patterns-dc-124/
[2] For a detailed timeline that identifies some of these elements see - http://bookstore.fairlds.org/product.php?id_product=612
[3] Material in the D&C, the JST and the books of Mormon, Abraham, and Moses demonstrate that Joseph Smith had a great deal of Nauvoo-style temple ideology available to him long before a Masonic lodge was established in Nauvoo.
[4] For statements reflecting this stance see - http://en.fairmormon.org/Freemasonry_Origins