
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
(Header) |
(→Chapter 3: Format) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
=Chapter 3= | =Chapter 3= | ||
{{BeginClaimsTable}} | {{BeginClaimsTable}} | ||
|159||"several days after Orson Pratt, Sidney Rigdon, and Ebenezer Robinson declined to affirm Smith's good character…."||The three were Pratt, Rigdon, and George W. Robinson, not Ebenezer. (See Manuscript History, 29 August 1842; History of the Church 5:139; Faulring, American Prophet's Record, 254).|| | |159||"several days after Orson Pratt, Sidney Rigdon, and Ebenezer Robinson declined to affirm Smith's good character…." | ||
* | || | ||
*The three were Pratt, Rigdon, and George W. Robinson, not Ebenezer. (See Manuscript History, 29 August 1842; History of the Church 5:139; Faulring, American Prophet's Record, 254). | |||
|| | |||
*''History of the Church'' 5:125, 139. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|160||Governor Carlin described that Nauvoo statute on writs as an "extraordinary assumption of power….most absurd and ridiculous…[a] gross usurpation of power that cannot be tolerated."|| | |160||Governor Carlin described that Nauvoo statute on writs as an "extraordinary assumption of power….most absurd and ridiculous…[a] gross usurpation of power that cannot be tolerated." | ||
|| | |||
*Carlin may not have agreed, but this does not mean that the law was reckless or irresponsible. | *Carlin may not have agreed, but this does not mean that the law was reckless or irresponsible. | ||
*[[Nauvoo_city_charter]] | |||
*[[Nauvoo_city_charter/Usurpation of power]] | |||
|| | |||
*''History of the Church'' 5:153-55. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|161||"The Nauvoo charter, which was the basis for this presumption of independence from state jurisdiction…." | |161||"The Nauvoo charter, which was the basis for this presumption of independence from state jurisdiction…." | ||
|| | |||
*Chapter 2 of the present work. No argument or justification for this claim is provided in the previous chapter. | *Chapter 2 of the present work. No argument or justification for this claim is provided in the previous chapter. | ||
*Smith again gives no hint that the Mormons were being anything but "presumptuous," when in fact the legal arguments of the day were likely in their favour. | *Smith again gives no hint that the Mormons were being anything but "presumptuous," when in fact the legal arguments of the day were likely in their favour. | ||
*[[Nauvoo_city_charter]] | |||
*[[Nauvoo_city_charter/Usurpation of power]] | |||
|| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|162||It is interesting that [The Peace Maker, a non-member's defence of polygamy] appeared during the hiatus in the erstwhile marriage frenzy of 1842 and while Smith's apostles were traveling the countryside to counter Bennett's words and deny polygamy."|| | |162||It is interesting that [The Peace Maker, a non-member's defence of polygamy] appeared during the hiatus in the erstwhile marriage frenzy of 1842 and while Smith's apostles were traveling the countryside to counter Bennett's words and deny polygamy." | ||
|| | |||
*G.D. Smith does not discuss the many differences between The Peace Maker and LDS doctrine. | *G.D. Smith does not discuss the many differences between The Peace Maker and LDS doctrine. | ||
*G.D. Smith and his source also ignore the arguments which had been raised against Joseph's participation or approval. | *G.D. Smith and his source also ignore the arguments which had been raised against Joseph's participation or approval. | ||
*[[Polygamy Book/The Peace Maker]] | |||
|| | |||
*Lawrence Foster, "A Little-Known Defense of Polygamy from the Mormon Press in 1842," Dialogue 9 (Winter 1974): 21–34. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|163||"…the entire Mormon community would be expelled from Illinois, primarily because of the dominant sense they betrayed public trust." | |163||"…the entire Mormon community would be expelled from Illinois, primarily because of the dominant sense they betrayed public trust." | ||
|| | |||
*G.D. Smith here over-simplifies an extremely complex issue, with no references or argument. | *G.D. Smith here over-simplifies an extremely complex issue, with no references or argument. | ||
|| | |||
*No source provided. He merely asserts and moves on. | *No source provided. He merely asserts and moves on. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|185||Joseph's "summer 1842 call for an intimate visit from Sarah Ann Whitney…substantiate[s] the intimate relationships he was involved in during those two years." | |185||Joseph's "summer 1842 call for an intimate visit from Sarah Ann Whitney…substantiate[s] the intimate relationships he was involved in during those two years." | ||
|| | |||
*Again, Sarah Ann. 185 | *Again, Sarah Ann. 185 | ||
|| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|185||"However, the History of the Church predictably gives no notice of these weddings." | |185||"However, the History of the Church predictably gives no notice of these weddings." | ||
|| | |||
*HoC again 185 | *HoC again 185 | ||
|| | |||
|- | |- | ||
|190||"The pretended marriage [of Joseph Kingsbury to the polygamously-married Sarah Ann Whitney] could have been a precaution against possible pregnancy."||Speculation.|| | |190||"The pretended marriage [of Joseph Kingsbury to the polygamously-married Sarah Ann Whitney] could have been a precaution against possible pregnancy." | ||
|| | |||
*Speculation. | |||
*Despite Smith's repetition of his "tryst" fable, there is no evidence of a sexual relationship with Sarah Ann. | |||
|| | |||
*No source provided. | *No source provided. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|193||Lucy Walker "told Joseph she required a revelation before she would submit [to plural marriage]. He promised that if she prayed, she would receive her own personal manifestation from God, which she reported she received 'near dawn after—a sleepless night"—when a "heavenly influence" and feeling of "supreme happiness…took possession" of her."||[[ | |193||Lucy Walker "told Joseph she required a revelation before she would submit [to plural marriage]. He promised that if she prayed, she would receive her own personal manifestation from God, which she reported she received 'near dawn after—a sleepless night"—when a "heavenly influence" and feeling of "supreme happiness…took possession" of her." | ||
|| | |||
*[[Plural marriage spiritual manifestations#Lucy_Walker|Plural marriage spiritual manifestations—Lucy_Walker]] | |||
|| | |||
*Smith provides the bare minimum of the story; Lucy's account is more impressive and powerful than these few fragments suggest: | |||
|| | |||
*Littlefield, Reminiscences, 48; Smith, Intimate Chronicle, 100, 557. | *Littlefield, Reminiscences, 48; Smith, Intimate Chronicle, 100, 557. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|196||Financial and marital issues, especially concerning the Lawrence sisters, would inflame public opinion prior to Smith's arrest. G.D. Smith does not tell us that Madsen's work demonstrates that Joseph properly discharged all his financial duties as guardians of the Lawrence estate.|| || | |196||Financial and marital issues, especially concerning the Lawrence sisters, would inflame public opinion prior to Smith's arrest. G.D. Smith does not tell us that Madsen's work demonstrates that Joseph properly discharged all his financial duties as guardians of the Lawrence estate. | ||
|| | |||
|| | |||
*GLSFARMS Paper Gordon Madsen, ‘The Lawrence Estate Revisited: Joseph Smith and Illinois Law regarding Guardianships,’ Nauvoo Symposium, Sept. 21, 1989, Brigham Young University | *GLSFARMS Paper Gordon Madsen, ‘The Lawrence Estate Revisited: Joseph Smith and Illinois Law regarding Guardianships,’ Nauvoo Symposium, Sept. 21, 1989, Brigham Young University | ||
|- | |- | ||
|198||There was a "conflict of interests between building a church community and [Joseph's] continuing affection for young women."||Loaded | |198||There was a "conflict of interests between building a church community and [Joseph's] continuing affection for young women." | ||
|| | |||
*[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language]] | |||
*Ages of wives wiki | |||
|| | |||
*No source provided. | *No source provided. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|198||"Joseph was pursuing Helen" Mar Kimball.||Loaded | |198||"Joseph was pursuing Helen" Mar Kimball. | ||
|| | |||
*[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language]] | |||
|| | |||
*No source provided. | *No source provided. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|201||Helen's biographer concludes that she 'expected her marriage to Joseph Smith' to be a ceremony 'for eternity only,' not an actual marriage involving physical relations.|| | |201||Helen's biographer concludes that she 'expected her marriage to Joseph Smith' to be a ceremony 'for eternity only,' not an actual marriage involving physical relations. | ||
|| | |||
*There is no evidence for physical relations in Sarah's marriage to Joseph. | *There is no evidence for physical relations in Sarah's marriage to Joseph. | ||
*The source, Compton, does not agree with G.D. Smith's reading: “there is absolutely no evidence that there was any sexuality in the marriage, and I suggest that, following later practice in Utah, there may have been no sexuality. All the evidence points to this marriage as a primarily dynastic marriage.” | *The source, Compton, does not agree with G.D. Smith's reading: “there is absolutely no evidence that there was any sexuality in the marriage, and I suggest that, following later practice in Utah, there may have been no sexuality. All the evidence points to this marriage as a primarily dynastic marriage.” | ||
*SEE GLSFARMS article | *SEE GLSFARMS article | ||
|| | |||
*{{CriticalWork:Compton:Sacred Loneliness|pages=500}} | |||
|- | |- | ||
|201||"How surprised she was to discover 'that it included [marriage for] time also": a physical union at age fourteen with a thirty-seven year-old man."|| | |201||"How surprised she was to discover 'that it included [marriage for] time also": a physical union at age fourteen with a thirty-seven year-old man." | ||
|| | |||
*G.D. Smith again distorts the above source. | *G.D. Smith again distorts the above source. | ||
*The surprise was not in finding that she needed to have "a physical union," but that she was regarded as married, and so could not date others her age while Joseph was alive. | *The surprise was not in finding that she needed to have "a physical union," but that she was regarded as married, and so could not date others her age while Joseph was alive. | ||
|| | |||
*{{CriticalWork:Compton:Sacred Loneliness|pages=500}} | |||
|- | |- | ||
|201||"As she put her ambivalent feelings into verse in her "Reminiscences," Helen had "thought through this life my time will be my own," but "the step I am now taking's for eternity alone." She saw her "youthful friends grow shy and cold" as "poisonous darts from sland'rous tongues were hurled." She was "bar'd out from social scenes by this destiny," and faced "sad'nd mem'ries of sweet departed joys" | |201||"As she put her ambivalent feelings into verse in her "Reminiscences," Helen had "thought through this life my time will be my own," but "the step I am now taking's for eternity alone." She saw her "youthful friends grow shy and cold" as "poisonous darts from sland'rous tongues were hurled." She was "bar'd out from social scenes by this destiny," and faced "sad'nd mem'ries of sweet departed joys" | ||
|| | |||
*This poem in fact demonstrates G.D. Smith's distortion. Her concern was indeed that she was "bar'd out from social scenes"—she could not date while married. This does not mean, however, that there were sexual relations, and G.D. Smith's source agrees. | *This poem in fact demonstrates G.D. Smith's distortion. Her concern was indeed that she was "bar'd out from social scenes"—she could not date while married. This does not mean, however, that there were sexual relations, and G.D. Smith's source agrees. | ||
*In addition to hiding Compton's conclusion, Smith does not tell us that his Kimball source likewise concluded that the marriage with Helen was “unconsummated.” | |||
*[[Polygamy/Helen Mar Kimball]] | |||
|| | |||
*Stanley B. Kimball, Heber C. Kimball: Mormon Patriarch and Pioneer (Ubana: University of Illinois Press, 1981): 109-110. | *Stanley B. Kimball, Heber C. Kimball: Mormon Patriarch and Pioneer (Ubana: University of Illinois Press, 1981): 109-110. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|205||"That [Rhoda Richards] was her husband Brigham's cousin was apparently secondary to the grander scheme of interlocking the hierarchy in marriage."|| || | |205||"That [Rhoda Richards] was her husband Brigham's cousin was apparently secondary to the grander scheme of interlocking the hierarchy in marriage." | ||
|| | |||
*Here G.D. Smith again relies on presentism to provide a hostile interpretive lens. It was not unusual for first cousins to marry; notable first-cousin marriages include scientists Charles Darwin and Albert Einstein; composers Edvard Grieg and Sergei Rachmaninoff; the founding prime minister of Canada, John A. Macdonald; and authors Edgar Allen Poe and H. G. Wells. Nineteen of the present-day states permit unrestricted marriage between first cousins, and most countries have no restrictions at all on marriage between cousins. In its exploitation of the presentist fallacy, G. D. Smith’s remark is utterly irrelevant in its historical context. | |||
|| | |||
*No source provided. | *No source provided. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|214||"Even though Smith and Clayton spent three hours preparing the eloquent language" of D&C 132…. | |214||"Even though Smith and Clayton spent three hours preparing the eloquent language" of D&C 132…. | ||
* | || | ||
*[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language]] | |||
*Presumes or implies that Joseph Smith and William Clayton were the author(s). | *Presumes or implies that Joseph Smith and William Clayton were the author(s). | ||
*Clayton would testify: "Joseph commenced to dictate the revelation on celestial marriage, and I wrote it, sentence by sentence, as he dictated. After the whole was written, Joseph asked me to read it through, slowly and carefully, which I did, and he pronounced it correct." | *Clayton would testify: "Joseph commenced to dictate the revelation on celestial marriage, and I wrote it, sentence by sentence, as he dictated. After the whole was written, Joseph asked me to read it through, slowly and carefully, which I did, and he pronounced it correct." | ||
|| | |||
*No source provided. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|217||"Smith found it useful to reference the conditional restriction on marriage found in the Book of Mormon."|| | |217||"Smith found it useful to reference the conditional restriction on marriage found in the Book of Mormon." | ||
|| | |||
*[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language]]|| | |||
*Implies that Joseph was acting out of pragmatism or opportunity, rather than out of sincere conviction. None | *Implies that Joseph was acting out of pragmatism or opportunity, rather than out of sincere conviction. None | ||
225-226 G.D. Smith intends Joseph to be seen as arrogant. He quotes a letter from Joseph to James Arlington Bennet: “I combat the errors of ages; I meet the violence of mobs; I cope with illegal proceedings from executive authority; I cut the Gordian knot of powers, and I solve mathematical problems of universities, with truth . . . diamond truth; and God is my ‘right hand man.’” G. D. Smith then editorializes: “With such a self-image, it is not surprising that he also aspired to the highest office in the land: the presidency of the United States.” G.D. Smith fails to tell us that Joseph's remarks are a tongue-in-cheek reply to Bennet's previous letter. | 225-226 G.D. Smith intends Joseph to be seen as arrogant. He quotes a letter from Joseph to James Arlington Bennet: “I combat the errors of ages; I meet the violence of mobs; I cope with illegal proceedings from executive authority; I cut the Gordian knot of powers, and I solve mathematical problems of universities, with truth . . . diamond truth; and God is my ‘right hand man.’” G. D. Smith then editorializes: “With such a self-image, it is not surprising that he also aspired to the highest office in the land: the presidency of the United States.” G.D. Smith fails to tell us that Joseph's remarks are a tongue-in-cheek reply to Bennet's previous letter. | ||
Line 85: | Line 135: | ||
*Probably wiki this section…. | *Probably wiki this section…. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|226||G.D. Smith again quotes Joseph: "‘I am learned, and know more than all the world put together."|| | |226||G.D. Smith again quotes Joseph: "‘I am learned, and know more than all the world put together." | ||
|| | |||
*G.D. Smith does not quote enough of Joseph's remarks to complete his thought: | *G.D. Smith does not quote enough of Joseph's remarks to complete his thought: | ||
*"If you tell them that God made the world out of something, they will call you a fool. The reason is that they are unlearned but I am learned and know more than all the world put together—the Holy Ghost does, anyhow. If the Holy Ghost in me comprehends more than all the world, I will associate myself with it." | *"If you tell them that God made the world out of something, they will call you a fool. The reason is that they are unlearned but I am learned and know more than all the world put together—the Holy Ghost does, anyhow. If the Holy Ghost in me comprehends more than all the world, I will associate myself with it." | ||
*G.D. Smith also avoids quoting the better versions of this talk, from the Times and Seasons, BYU Studies, or even Signature Books. | *G.D. Smith also avoids quoting the better versions of this talk, from the Times and Seasons, BYU Studies, or even Signature Books. | ||
*GLS FARMS paper | *GLS FARMS paper | ||
*Maybe also wiki…. | *Maybe also wiki…. | ||
|| | |||
*''History of the Church'' 6:222–223. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|227||"There is no reason to doubt that Smith's marriages involved sexual relations in most instances."||We have evidence of sexual relations for only nine wives.|| | |227||"There is no reason to doubt that Smith's marriages involved sexual relations in most instances." | ||
|| | |||
*We have evidence of sexual relations for only nine wives. | |||
*GLSFARMS paper | |||
|| | |||
*No source provided. | *No source provided. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|227||"Mary Elizabeth Lightner spoke of 'three children' whom she said she 'knew he had.'"||[[Joseph Smith and polygamy/Children of polygamous marriages]] | |227||"Mary Elizabeth Lightner spoke of 'three children' whom she said she 'knew he had.'" | ||
|| | |||
*[[Joseph Smith and polygamy/Children of polygamous marriages]] | |||
*The Life & Testimony of Mary Lightner (Salt Lake City: Kraut's Pioneer Press, n.d.); "Mary E. Lightner's Testimony, As Delivered at Brigham Young University)," [punctuation is like that in Smith] Apr. 14, 1905, 41-42, complied by N.B. Lundwall, LDS Archives, at Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. ref is long so at the left | *The Life & Testimony of Mary Lightner (Salt Lake City: Kraut's Pioneer Press, n.d.); "Mary E. Lightner's Testimony, As Delivered at Brigham Young University)," [punctuation is like that in Smith] Apr. 14, 1905, 41-42, complied by N.B. Lundwall, LDS Archives, at Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. ref is long so at the left | ||
228-229 "Until decisive DNA testing of possible Smith descendants—daughters as well as sons—from plural wives can be accomplished, ascertaining whether Smith fathered children with any of his plural wives remains hypothetical." This is true, but G. D. Smith fails to tell us that all those who have been definitively tested so far—Oliver Buell, Mosiah Hancock, Zebulon Jacobs, Moroni Pratt, and Orrison Smith—have been excluded. Would he have neglected, I wonder, to mention a positive DNA test? | 228-229 "Until decisive DNA testing of possible Smith descendants—daughters as well as sons—from plural wives can be accomplished, ascertaining whether Smith fathered children with any of his plural wives remains hypothetical." This is true, but G. D. Smith fails to tell us that all those who have been definitively tested so far—Oliver Buell, Mosiah Hancock, Zebulon Jacobs, Moroni Pratt, and Orrison Smith—have been excluded. Would he have neglected, I wonder, to mention a positive DNA test? | ||
|| | |||
*No source provided. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|230||"In 1841, Sarah Pratt firmly rebuffed Smith and remained monogamously committed to her missionary husband."||[[John C. Bennett]]|| | |230||"In 1841, Sarah Pratt firmly rebuffed Smith and remained monogamously committed to her missionary husband." | ||
|| | |||
*G.D. Smith here again follows Bennett completely uncritically. He tells us nothing about the multiple witnesses who testified to Sarah's adultery with Bennett. | |||
*[[John C. Bennett]] | |||
|| | |||
*Bennett, History of the Saints, 228-31; "Workings of Mormonism Related by Mrs. Orson Pratt," 1884, LDS Archives. | *Bennett, History of the Saints, 228-31; "Workings of Mormonism Related by Mrs. Orson Pratt," 1884, LDS Archives. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|231||"Cordelia C. Morley Cox….had rejected [Joseph's] amorous proposal." | |231||"Cordelia C. Morley Cox….had rejected [Joseph's] amorous proposal." | ||
|| | |||
*G.D. Smith again uses loaded language. There is little evidence that Joseph's proposals were romantic or amorous. | *G.D. Smith again uses loaded language. There is little evidence that Joseph's proposals were romantic or amorous. | ||
*[[../../Mind reading]] | |||
|| | |||
*Cordelia Morley Cox, Autobiographical statement, Mar. 17, 1909, Perry Special Collections. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|232||Eliza Winters “perhaps did not” resist Joseph’s advances “but apparently talked about it all the same.”||Eliza Winters wiki? | |232||Eliza Winters “perhaps did not” resist Joseph’s advances “but apparently talked about it all the same.” | ||
|| | |||
*Eliza Winters wiki? | |||
*There is no evidence that Eliza ever said anything about it. | *There is no evidence that Eliza ever said anything about it. | ||
*GLSFARMS | *GLSFARMS | ||
|| | |||
*No source provided. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|234||"According to LDS theology, the posthumous sealing meant that Heber would be Smith's son in the eternities, not the son of his biological father."||Needs work….|| | |234||"According to LDS theology, the posthumous sealing meant that Heber would be Smith's son in the eternities, not the son of his biological father." | ||
|| | |||
*Needs work…. | |||
|| | |||
*No source provided. | *No source provided. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|235||[In 1831 Joseph] "directed missionaries to marry native American women."||[[Native Americans to become "white and delightsome" through polygamous marriage? ]] | |235||[In 1831 Joseph] "directed missionaries to marry native American women." | ||
|| | |||
*[[Native Americans to become "white and delightsome" through polygamous marriage? ]] | |||
*[[Polygamy_book/Initiation_of_the_practice]] || | |||
*[See also p. 260.] Joseph did not direct them to marry the women. None did so. Joseph reported that God said that "It is my will, ''that in time'', ye should take unto you wives of the Lamanites and Nephites…." (italics added). | *[See also p. 260.] Joseph did not direct them to marry the women. None did so. Joseph reported that God said that "It is my will, ''that in time'', ye should take unto you wives of the Lamanites and Nephites…." (italics added). | ||
*That this might entail plural marriage was only realized three years later when Joseph was asked about it. | *That this might entail plural marriage was only realized three years later when Joseph was asked about it. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|236||G.D. Smith hints that Emma would have to sneak up on Joseph to check up on him, as evidenced by “his warning to Sarah Ann to proceed carefully in order to make sure Emma would not find them in their hiding place.”|| || | |236||G.D. Smith hints that Emma would have to sneak up on Joseph to check up on him, as evidenced by “his warning to Sarah Ann to proceed carefully in order to make sure Emma would not find them in their hiding place.” | ||
|| | |||
*Joseph’s hiding place from the mob and instructions to the Whitneys have been transmogrified into a hiding place for Joseph and Sarah Ann. | |||
|| | |||
*No source provided. | *No source provided. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|236||G. D. Smith asks us to “assume . . . that LeRoi Snow’s account [about Emma and Eliza and the stairs] was accurate.”|| | |236||G. D. Smith asks us to “assume . . . that LeRoi Snow’s account [about Emma and Eliza and the stairs] was accurate.” | ||
|| | |||
*[See also p. 130-134.] Yet again, Smith provides no hint that most researchers doubt this event. | *[See also p. 130-134.] Yet again, Smith provides no hint that most researchers doubt this event. | ||
*He does nothing to deal with their objections here or elsewhere. | *He does nothing to deal with their objections here or elsewhere. | ||
|| | |||
*No source provided. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|236||"Just as Joseph sought comfort from Sarah Ann the day Emma departed from his hideout…."||G.D. Smith's version of Sarah Ann is again trotted out.|| | |236||"Just as Joseph sought comfort from Sarah Ann the day Emma departed from his hideout…." | ||
* | || | ||
*G.D. Smith's version of Sarah Ann is again trotted out. | |||
|| | |||
*No source provided. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|237||Joseph's "insatiable addition of one woman after another to an invisible family…."||Mind reading | |237||Joseph's "insatiable addition of one woman after another to an invisible family…." | ||
|| | |||
*If Joseph was "insatiable," (unable to be satisfied," how could he avoid entering into marriages for the last nine months of his life? | |||
*[[../../Mind reading]] | |||
*[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language]] | |||
|| | |||
*No source provided. | *No source provided. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|237||Joseph had a "prolonged dalliance with Fanny Alger."||Loaded | |237||Joseph had a "prolonged dalliance with Fanny Alger." | ||
* | || | ||
*[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language]] | |||
|| | |||
*No source provided. | |||
{{EndClaimsTable}} | {{EndClaimsTable}} |
Page | Claim | Response | Author's sources | |
---|---|---|---|---|
159 | "several days after Orson Pratt, Sidney Rigdon, and Ebenezer Robinson declined to affirm Smith's good character…." |
|
| |
160 | Governor Carlin described that Nauvoo statute on writs as an "extraordinary assumption of power….most absurd and ridiculous…[a] gross usurpation of power that cannot be tolerated." |
|
| |
161 | "The Nauvoo charter, which was the basis for this presumption of independence from state jurisdiction…." |
|
||
162 | It is interesting that [The Peace Maker, a non-member's defence of polygamy] appeared during the hiatus in the erstwhile marriage frenzy of 1842 and while Smith's apostles were traveling the countryside to counter Bennett's words and deny polygamy." |
|
| |
163 | "…the entire Mormon community would be expelled from Illinois, primarily because of the dominant sense they betrayed public trust." |
|
| |
185 | Joseph's "summer 1842 call for an intimate visit from Sarah Ann Whitney…substantiate[s] the intimate relationships he was involved in during those two years." |
|
||
185 | "However, the History of the Church predictably gives no notice of these weddings." |
|
||
190 | "The pretended marriage [of Joseph Kingsbury to the polygamously-married Sarah Ann Whitney] could have been a precaution against possible pregnancy." |
|
| |
193 | Lucy Walker "told Joseph she required a revelation before she would submit [to plural marriage]. He promised that if she prayed, she would receive her own personal manifestation from God, which she reported she received 'near dawn after—a sleepless night"—when a "heavenly influence" and feeling of "supreme happiness…took possession" of her." |
|
| |
196 | Financial and marital issues, especially concerning the Lawrence sisters, would inflame public opinion prior to Smith's arrest. G.D. Smith does not tell us that Madsen's work demonstrates that Joseph properly discharged all his financial duties as guardians of the Lawrence estate. |
| ||
198 | There was a "conflict of interests between building a church community and [Joseph's] continuing affection for young women." |
|
| |
198 | "Joseph was pursuing Helen" Mar Kimball. |
| ||
201 | Helen's biographer concludes that she 'expected her marriage to Joseph Smith' to be a ceremony 'for eternity only,' not an actual marriage involving physical relations. |
|
| |
201 | "How surprised she was to discover 'that it included [marriage for] time also": a physical union at age fourteen with a thirty-seven year-old man." |
|
| |
201 | "As she put her ambivalent feelings into verse in her "Reminiscences," Helen had "thought through this life my time will be my own," but "the step I am now taking's for eternity alone." She saw her "youthful friends grow shy and cold" as "poisonous darts from sland'rous tongues were hurled." She was "bar'd out from social scenes by this destiny," and faced "sad'nd mem'ries of sweet departed joys" |
|
| |
205 | "That [Rhoda Richards] was her husband Brigham's cousin was apparently secondary to the grander scheme of interlocking the hierarchy in marriage." |
|
| |
214 | "Even though Smith and Clayton spent three hours preparing the eloquent language" of D&C 132…. |
|
| |
217 | "Smith found it useful to reference the conditional restriction on marriage found in the Book of Mormon." |
225-226 G.D. Smith intends Joseph to be seen as arrogant. He quotes a letter from Joseph to James Arlington Bennet: “I combat the errors of ages; I meet the violence of mobs; I cope with illegal proceedings from executive authority; I cut the Gordian knot of powers, and I solve mathematical problems of universities, with truth . . . diamond truth; and God is my ‘right hand man.’” G. D. Smith then editorializes: “With such a self-image, it is not surprising that he also aspired to the highest office in the land: the presidency of the United States.” G.D. Smith fails to tell us that Joseph's remarks are a tongue-in-cheek reply to Bennet's previous letter.
| ||
226 | G.D. Smith again quotes Joseph: "‘I am learned, and know more than all the world put together." |
|
| |
227 | "There is no reason to doubt that Smith's marriages involved sexual relations in most instances." |
|
| |
227 | "Mary Elizabeth Lightner spoke of 'three children' whom she said she 'knew he had.'" |
228-229 "Until decisive DNA testing of possible Smith descendants—daughters as well as sons—from plural wives can be accomplished, ascertaining whether Smith fathered children with any of his plural wives remains hypothetical." This is true, but G. D. Smith fails to tell us that all those who have been definitively tested so far—Oliver Buell, Mosiah Hancock, Zebulon Jacobs, Moroni Pratt, and Orrison Smith—have been excluded. Would he have neglected, I wonder, to mention a positive DNA test? |
| |
230 | "In 1841, Sarah Pratt firmly rebuffed Smith and remained monogamously committed to her missionary husband." |
|
| |
231 | "Cordelia C. Morley Cox….had rejected [Joseph's] amorous proposal." |
|
| |
232 | Eliza Winters “perhaps did not” resist Joseph’s advances “but apparently talked about it all the same.” |
|
| |
234 | "According to LDS theology, the posthumous sealing meant that Heber would be Smith's son in the eternities, not the son of his biological father." |
|
| |
235 | [In 1831 Joseph] "directed missionaries to marry native American women." |
| ||
236 | G.D. Smith hints that Emma would have to sneak up on Joseph to check up on him, as evidenced by “his warning to Sarah Ann to proceed carefully in order to make sure Emma would not find them in their hiding place.” |
|
| |
236 | G. D. Smith asks us to “assume . . . that LeRoi Snow’s account [about Emma and Eliza and the stairs] was accurate.” |
|
| |
236 | "Just as Joseph sought comfort from Sarah Ann the day Emma departed from his hideout…." |
|
| |
237 | Joseph's "insatiable addition of one woman after another to an invisible family…." |
|
| |
237 | Joseph had a "prolonged dalliance with Fanny Alger." |
|
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now