
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
(→Endnotes: Typo) |
|||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
:..one thing I want to see you for is <to> git the fulness of my blessings sealed upon our heads, &c. you wi will pardon me for my earnest=ness on <this subject> when you consider how lonesome I must be, your good feelings know how to <make> every allowance for me... | :..one thing I want to see you for is <to> git the fulness of my blessings sealed upon our heads, &c. you wi will pardon me for my earnest=ness on <this subject> when you consider how lonesome I must be, your good feelings know how to <make> every allowance for me... | ||
According to Richard L. Bushman, this may have been "a reference perhaps to the sealing of Newel and Elizabeth in eternal marriage three days later." In addition, Joseph "may have been a lonely man who needed people around him every moment." {{ref|bushman.473}} Consider this phrase (included | According to Richard L. Bushman, this may have been "a reference perhaps to the sealing of Newel and Elizabeth in eternal marriage three days later." {{ref|bushman.473.1}} Compton adds, "This was not just a meeting of husband and plural wife, it was a meeting with Sarah's family, with a religious aspect. {{ref|compton.350}} | ||
In addition to the stated purpose of the meeting, Joseph "may have been a lonely man who needed people around him every moment." {{ref|bushman.473.2}} Consider this phrase (included in Van Wagoner's treatment, but excluded by the others): | |||
:...it would afford me great relief, ''of mind'', if those ''with whom I am al[l]ied'', do love me, now is the time to afford me succour, in the days of exile. {{ea}} | :...it would afford me great relief, ''of mind'', if those ''with whom I am al[l]ied'', do love me, now is the time to afford me succour, in the days of exile. {{ea}} | ||
Line 58: | Line 60: | ||
These are not the words of a man asking his secret lover to meet him for a private tryst—they are the words of a man who wants the company of friends. | These are not the words of a man asking his secret lover to meet him for a private tryst—they are the words of a man who wants the company of friends. | ||
So, what about Emma? The letter certainly contains dire warnings about having the Whitney's avoid an encounter Emma. Joseph had been sealed to Sarah Ann three weeks before without Emma's knowledge. {{ref|bushman.473. | So, what about Emma? The letter certainly contains dire warnings about having the Whitney's avoid an encounter Emma. Joseph had been sealed to Sarah Ann three weeks before without Emma's knowledge. {{ref|bushman.473.3}} An encounter between the Whitney's and Emma would have certainly become a very uncomfortable situation for all involved. | ||
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== |
This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.
Critics claim that in an 18 August 1842 Joseph Smith wrote a “love letter” to Sarah Ann Whitney requesting a secret rendezvous. Joseph had been sealed to Sarah Ann three weeks prior to this time.
Did Joseph Smith write private and secret “love letters” to some of his young plural wives? Critics point to a letter written by Joseph in Nauvoo on August 18th 1842. At this point in time the Prophet was in hiding as a result of the assassination attempt that had been made on Missouri governor Lillburn Boggs. [1] Three weeks prior to writing this letter, Joseph had been sealed to Sarah Ann Whitney by her father Newell Whitney. Critics point to the letter as evidence the Joseph wrote a private and secret “love letter” to Sarah Ann, requesting that she visit him while he was in seclusion. Consider the following excerpt from a website:
This certainly has all of the elements of a secret “love letter:” The statement that it would not be safe if Emma were there, the request to “burn this letter as soon as you read it,” and the stealthy instructions for approaching the house. The question is, who was this letter addressed to? The critics on their web site clearly want you to believe that this was a private letter to Sarah Ann.
Here are Van Wagoner’s selected excerpts of the same letter. In this case, at least, he acknowledges that the letter was addressed to “the Whitney’s,” rather than Sarah, but adds his own opinion that it “detailed [Joseph’s] problems in getting to see Sarah Ann without Emma's knowledge:”
Finally, we have the ultimate spin on the same letter—an excerpt which makes it sound like Joseph was absolutely lusting for the company of Sarah Ann. Consider this excerpt of the same letter as it is portrayed by George D. Smith, who claims that a “young man of ambition and vision penned his own letter of affection to a young woman. It was the summer of 1842 when thirty-six-year-old Joseph Smith, hiding from the law down by the Mississippi River in Illinois, confessed:"
As always, it is helpful to view the entire set of statements in content—something which none of the critics mentioned above manage to do. What follows is the entire letter, with the selections extracted by the critics highlighted:
Nauvoo August 18th 1842
Dear, and Beloved, Brother and Sister, Whitney, and &c.—
I take this oppertunity to communi[c]ate, some of my feelings, privetely at this time, which I want you three Eternaly to keep in your own bosams; for my feelings are so strong for you since what has pased lately between us, that the time of my abscence from you seems so long, and dreary, that it seems, as if I could not live long in this way: and <if you> three would come and see me in this my lonely retreat, it would afford me great relief, of mind, if those with whom I am alied, do love me; now is the time to afford me succour, in the days of exile, for you know I foretold you of these things. I am now at Carlos Graingers, Just back of Brother Hyrams farm, it is only one mile from town, the nights are very pleasant indeed, all three of you come <can> come and See me in the fore part of the night, let Brother Whitney come a little a head, and nock at the south East corner of the house at <the> window; it is next to the cornfield, I have a room inti=rely by myself, the whole matter can be attended to with most perfect safty, I <know> it is the will of God that you should comfort <me> now in this time of affliction, or not at[ta]l now is the time or never, but I hav[e] no kneed of saying any such thing, to you, for I know the goodness of your hearts, and that you will do the will of the Lord, when it is made known to you; the only thing to be careful of; is to find out when Emma comes then you cannot be safe, but when she is not here, there is the most perfect safty: only be careful to escape observation, as much as possible, I know it is a heroick undertakeing; but so much the greater frendship, and the more Joy, when I see you I <will> tell you all my plans, I cannot write them on paper, burn this letter as soon as you read it; keep all locked up in your breasts, my life depends upon it. one thing I want to see you for is <to> git the fulness of my blessings sealed upon our heads, &c. you wi will pardon me for my earnest=ness on <this subject> when you consider how lonesome I must be, your good feelings know how to <make> every allowance for me, I close my letter, I think Emma wont come tonight if she dont dont fail to come to night. I subscribe myself your most obedient, <and> affectionate, companion, and friend.
Joseph Smith
So, let’s take a look at the portions of the letter that are not highlighted or included by any of these critics.
The letter is addressed to “Brother and Sister Whitney.” Sarah Ann is not mentioned by name, but is included as “&c.,” which is the equivalent of saying “and so on,” or “etc.” This hardly implies that what follows is a private “love letter” to Sarah Ann herself. In Todd Compton's opinion, Joseph "cautiously avoids writing Sarah's name." [2]
Again, Joseph wants to talk to “you three,” meaning Brother and Sister Whitney, and Sarah Ann.
Interestingly enough, the one portion of the letter in which Joseph actually gives a reason for this meeting is excluded by the critics:
According to Richard L. Bushman, this may have been "a reference perhaps to the sealing of Newel and Elizabeth in eternal marriage three days later." [3] Compton adds, "This was not just a meeting of husband and plural wife, it was a meeting with Sarah's family, with a religious aspect. [4]
In addition to the stated purpose of the meeting, Joseph "may have been a lonely man who needed people around him every moment." [5] Consider this phrase (included in Van Wagoner's treatment, but excluded by the others):
These are not the words of a man asking his secret lover to meet him for a private tryst—they are the words of a man who wants the company of friends.
So, what about Emma? The letter certainly contains dire warnings about having the Whitney's avoid an encounter Emma. Joseph had been sealed to Sarah Ann three weeks before without Emma's knowledge. [6] An encounter between the Whitney's and Emma would have certainly become a very uncomfortable situation for all involved.
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now