
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
SpencerMarsh (talk | contribs) |
SpencerMarsh (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_Fathers Early Church fathers] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clement_of_Alexandria Clement of Alexandria] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origen Origen], as early as the second and third centuries respectively, “held the possibility of even Satan being restored.”<ref>Vogel, “Anti-Universalist Rhetoric,” 27n8.</ref> | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_Fathers Early Church fathers] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clement_of_Alexandria Clement of Alexandria] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origen Origen], as early as the second and third centuries respectively, “held the possibility of even Satan being restored.”<ref>Vogel, “Anti-Universalist Rhetoric,” 27n8.</ref> | ||
Some of our earliest extant writings from the ancient world attest to the idea of universal salvation. Latter-day Saint scholar and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apologetics apologist] Martin S. Tanner discusses ''The Good Fortune of the Dead'', “a text that sets forth the ancient Egyptian belief that, upon death, all find a fulfillment of the good things of this life. Regarding the peaceful place to which the Egyptians believed that the soul goes after death…we find it written, ‘All our kinsfolk rest in it since the first day of time. They who are to be, for millions of millions, will all have come to it. . . .There exists not one who fails to reach yon place. . . .Welcome safe and sound!”<ref>Martin S. Tanner, “[https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr/vol6/iss1/14/ Is There Nephite Anti-Universalist Rhetoric in the Book of Mormon?]” ''Review of Books on the Book of Mormon'' 6 , no. 1 (1994): 418–33. Citing "The Good Fortune of the Dead," in James B. Prichard, ed., ''Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament'', 3d ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974), 33–34; A. H. Gardiner, ''The Attitude of the Ancient Egyptians to Death and the Dead'' (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1935), 32.</ref> | Some of our earliest extant writings from the ancient world attest to the idea of universal salvation. Latter-day Saint scholar and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apologetics apologist] Martin S. Tanner discusses ''The Good Fortune of the Dead'', “a text that sets forth the ancient Egyptian belief that, upon death, all find a fulfillment of the good things of this life. Regarding the peaceful place to which the Egyptians believed that the soul goes after death…we find it written, ‘All our kinsfolk rest in it since the first day of time. They who are to be, for millions of millions, will all have come to it. . . .There exists not one who fails to reach yon place. . . .Welcome safe and sound!”<ref>Martin S. Tanner, “[https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr/vol6/iss1/14/ Is There Nephite Anti-Universalist Rhetoric in the Book of Mormon?]” ''Review of Books on the Book of Mormon'' 6, no. 1 (1994): 418–33. Citing "The Good Fortune of the Dead," in James B. Prichard, ed., ''Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament'', 3d ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974), 33–34; A. H. Gardiner, ''The Attitude of the Ancient Egyptians to Death and the Dead'' (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1935), 32.</ref> | ||
Early [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrianism Zoroastrianism] espoused the idea of universal salvation.<ref>George A. Mather and Larry A. Nichols. "Unitarian-Universalist Association (UAA) History," ''Dictionary of Cults, Sects, Religion and the Occult'' (Grand Rapids: Harper Collins, 1993), 286. Cited in Tanner, “Is There Nephite Anti-Universalist Rhetoric?” 433n29.</ref> | Early [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrianism Zoroastrianism] espoused the idea of universal salvation.<ref>George A. Mather and Larry A. Nichols. "Unitarian-Universalist Association (UAA) History," ''Dictionary of Cults, Sects, Religion and the Occult'' (Grand Rapids: Harper Collins, 1993), 286. Cited in Tanner, “Is There Nephite Anti-Universalist Rhetoric?” 433n29.</ref> | ||
Critics of the Book of Mormon allege that it contains anti-universalist rhetoric and that this rhetoric was derived from Joseph Smith’s contemporary religious culture.[1]
This article will present evidence that this criticism is based on a false dilemma fallacy and that such appearance of universalism and concerns about it appear in the ancient world. If enough evidence of such a presence of universalism exists in the ancient world, then it can be used to demonstrate that there is a plausible religious context in which ideas like universalism can develop during Book of Mormon times and in which Book of Mormon prophets can respond to such ideas--thus showing that this presents no problem for a believing, orthodox Latter-day Saint's worldview that includes belief in the historical authenticity of the Book of Mormon and the integrity and divine calling of its supposed translator, Joseph Smith.
There are many examples from the ancient world of universalism that can provide a context for the Book of Mormon’s words about universalism found in passages like Alma 1:3-4 and Alma 21: 6-9.
Early Church fathers Clement of Alexandria and Origen, as early as the second and third centuries respectively, “held the possibility of even Satan being restored.”[2]
Some of our earliest extant writings from the ancient world attest to the idea of universal salvation. Latter-day Saint scholar and apologist Martin S. Tanner discusses The Good Fortune of the Dead, “a text that sets forth the ancient Egyptian belief that, upon death, all find a fulfillment of the good things of this life. Regarding the peaceful place to which the Egyptians believed that the soul goes after death…we find it written, ‘All our kinsfolk rest in it since the first day of time. They who are to be, for millions of millions, will all have come to it. . . .There exists not one who fails to reach yon place. . . .Welcome safe and sound!”[3]
Early Zoroastrianism espoused the idea of universal salvation.[4]
“There are also Old Testament passages which have been interpreted as authority for the idea of universal salvation.[5] These would have been familiar to Lehi and his descendants as part of the brass plates taken to the New World which were part of the Nephite culture (1 Nephi 19:21-23; Alma 37:3-4).”[6]
Clearly there is enough historical evidence to demonstrate how this criticism relies on a false dilemma fallacy. Most accusations of plagiarism or the imputation of outside cultural influence to the Book of Mormon rest on such a fallacy. Critics and defenders will need to be aware of this moving forward as Book of Mormon scholarship advances.
Notes

FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now