FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Array
Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Mulek: Difference between revisions
m (→Response) |
m (→Endnotes) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==Endnotes== | ==Endnotes== | ||
# {{note|welch1}} ''Reexploring the Book of Mormon'' ( | # {{note|welch1}} John W. Welch, ed., ''Reexploring the Book of Mormon'' (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and FARMS, 1992), 142–44. | ||
# {{note|chadwick1}}{{JBMS-12-2-9}} | # {{note|chadwick1}}{{JBMS-12-2-9}} | ||
Revision as of 01:23, 26 September 2007
This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.
Criticism
Critics of the Book of Mormon argue that it contradicts the Bible when it states that one of King Zedekiah's sons (Mulek) escaped and came to the Americas.
Source(s) of the Criticism
- Utah Lighthouse Ministries.
- Saints Alive Ministry Newsletter. May-June 1999.
- Life After Ministries.
Response
The Book of Mormon teaches that when Jerusalem was destroyed by Babylon during the reign of Zedekiah all of the sons of Zedekiah were killed, except one son named Mulek. Omni 1:15, Helaman 8:21
Biblical evidence does not preclude the existence of another son of King Zedekiah. In fact, recent evidence brought to light by non-LDS scholars indicates otherwise:
- The first clue of the existence and escape of Mulek, son of Zedekiah, can be found in 2 Kings 25:1-10, which reports that Nebuchadrezzar and "all his host" scattered "all the men" and "all [the king's] army" and burnt "all the houses of Jerusalem," and with "all the army" they destroyed the walls. In the midst of all this, however, 2 Kings 25:7 omits the word all when it reports only that "the sons" of Zedekiah were killed, leaving open the question whether all of his sons were slain.[1]
Although it is debatable, there is some evidence of "Malchiah the son of Hammelech" in Jeremiah 38:6 as a possible reference to this Mulek.[2]
a "Seal of Mulek" being discovered in Jerusalem. [3]
Conclusion
A summary of the argument against the criticism.
Endnotes
- [note] John W. Welch, ed., Reexploring the Book of Mormon (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and FARMS, 1992), 142–44.
- [note] Jeffrey R. Chadwick, "Has the Seal of Mulek Been Found?," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 12/2 (2003). [72–83] link
Further reading
FAIR wiki articles
Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Mulek
FAIR web site
External links
- Jeffrey R. Chadwick, "Has the Seal of Mulek Been Found?," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 12/2 (2003). [72–83] link
- John L. Sorenson, "The Mulekites," Brigham Young University Studies 30 no. ? (Summer 1990), 6–22. off-site
Printed material
- Anonymous, "New Information About Mulek, Son of the King," in Reexploring the Book of Mormon, edited by John W. Welch (Provo, Utah: FARMS, 1992), 142–144.GL direct link