Array

Understanding pre-1978 statements about race: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
|L=Mormonism and racial issues/Blacks and the priesthood/Understanding pre-1978 statements
|L=Mormonism and racial issues/Blacks and the priesthood/Understanding pre-1978 statements
|H=Understanding pre-1978 statements by members and leaders of the Church regarding the priesthood ban
|H=Understanding pre-1978 statements by members and leaders of the Church regarding the priesthood ban
|S=Critics frequently parade justifications for the ban by past General Authorities that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord," and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.
|S=Past General Authorities made statements regarding the priesthood ban that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord" for our time, and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.
|L1=Gordon B. Hinckley: "I remind you that no man who makes disparaging remarks concerning those of another race can consider himself a true disciple of Christ"
|L1=Gordon B. Hinckley: "I remind you that no man who makes disparaging remarks concerning those of another race can consider himself a true disciple of Christ"
|L2=Bruce R. McConkie: "Forget everything that I have said, or what President Brigham Young or President George Q. Cannon or whomsoever has said in days past that is contrary to the present revelation"
|L2=Bruce R. McConkie: "Forget everything that I have said, or what President Brigham Young or President George Q. Cannon or whomsoever has said in days past that is contrary to the present revelation"

Revision as of 03:25, 5 July 2018


Understanding pre-1978 statements by members and leaders of the Church regarding the priesthood ban

Summary: Past General Authorities made statements regarding the priesthood ban that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord" for our time, and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.


Jump to details:


Understanding pre-1978 statements by members and leaders of the Church regarding the priesthood ban

Summary: Past General Authorities made statements regarding the priesthood ban that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord" for our time, and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.


Jump to details:


Understanding pre-1978 statements by members and leaders of the Church regarding the priesthood ban

Summary: Past General Authorities made statements regarding the priesthood ban that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord" for our time, and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.


Jump to details:


Understanding pre-1978 statements by members and leaders of the Church regarding the priesthood ban

Summary: Past General Authorities made statements regarding the priesthood ban that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord" for our time, and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.


Jump to details:


Understanding pre-1978 statements by members and leaders of the Church regarding the priesthood ban

Summary: Past General Authorities made statements regarding the priesthood ban that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord" for our time, and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.


Jump to details:


Understanding pre-1978 statements by members and leaders of the Church regarding the priesthood ban

Summary: Past General Authorities made statements regarding the priesthood ban that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord" for our time, and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.


Jump to details:

To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, [[../CriticalSources|click here]]

Notes



Further reading and additional sources responding to these claims