
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-\|response=\n +|authorsources=<br>\n#\n}}\n)) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-\#\* +#)) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Smith said that his First Vision occurred in the early 1820s, when he was in his early teens | Smith said that his First Vision occurred in the early 1820s, when he was in his early teens | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #Joseph Smith-History 1: 5 [http://scriptures.lds.org/en/js_h/1/5 Joseph Smith-History 1: 5]. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
but his accounts mention different dates within that period. In 1832, Smith wrote that the vision had occurred "in the 16th year of [his] age" (about 1821), after he became concerned about religious matters beginning in his "twelfth year" (about 1817). | but his accounts mention different dates within that period. In 1832, Smith wrote that the vision had occurred "in the 16th year of [his] age" (about 1821), after he became concerned about religious matters beginning in his "twelfth year" (about 1817). | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #{{Harv|Smith|1832|p=3}} | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
In a later account Smith said the vision took place "early in the spring of 1820" after an "unusual excitement on the subject of religion" ending during his 15th year (1820). | In a later account Smith said the vision took place "early in the spring of 1820" after an "unusual excitement on the subject of religion" ending during his 15th year (1820). | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #{{Harv|Roberts |1902|loc=vol. 1, ch. 1, p. 7}} | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
LDS member and [[Columbia University]] Professor [[Richard Bushman]] wrote that Smith 'began to be concerned about religion in late 1817 or early 1818, when the aftereffects of the revival of 1816 and 1817 were still being felt." | LDS member and [[Columbia University]] Professor [[Richard Bushman]] wrote that Smith 'began to be concerned about religion in late 1817 or early 1818, when the aftereffects of the revival of 1816 and 1817 were still being felt." | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #{{Harv|Bushman|2005|p=37}} | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
LDS apologist [[Milton Backman]] wrote that religious outbreaks occurred in 1819-1820 within a fifty-mile radius of Smith's home. "Church records, newspapers, religious journals, and other contemporary sources clearly reveal that great awakenings occurred in more than fifty western New York towns or villages during the revival of 1819–1820....Primary sources also specify that great multitudes joined the Methodist, Presbyterian, and Calvinist Baptist societies in the region of country where Joseph Smith lived." | LDS apologist [[Milton Backman]] wrote that religious outbreaks occurred in 1819-1820 within a fifty-mile radius of Smith's home. "Church records, newspapers, religious journals, and other contemporary sources clearly reveal that great awakenings occurred in more than fifty western New York towns or villages during the revival of 1819–1820....Primary sources also specify that great multitudes joined the Methodist, Presbyterian, and Calvinist Baptist societies in the region of country where Joseph Smith lived." | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #Milton V. Backman, Jr., [https://byustudies.byu.edu/shop/PDFSRC/9.3Backman.pdf ''Awakenings in the Burned - over District: New Light on the Historical Setting of the First Vision'' (BYU Studies, 1969)], 11. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
According to non-Mormon critics, H. Michael Marquardt and Wesley P. Walters, there is no evidence that large multi-denominational revivals took place in the immediate Palmyra area between 1819 and 1820, the period specified by Smith in the canonized account of the First Vision. Smith's statement that "great multitudes" joined the various religious denominations "in the neighborhood where I lived," is not borne out by the surviving documents. Neither the Presbyterian, Baptist, nor Methodist churches in Palmyra experienced any remarkable religious outpouring. The Methodist circuit in the area even showed net losses from 1819 to 1821. "Denominational magazines of that day were full of reports of revivals, some even devoting separate sections to them." While these magazines covered the 1816-17 and the 1824-25 revivals in the Palmyra area, there is "not a single mention of any revival taking place in the Palmyra area" in 1819-20. | According to non-Mormon critics, H. Michael Marquardt and Wesley P. Walters, there is no evidence that large multi-denominational revivals took place in the immediate Palmyra area between 1819 and 1820, the period specified by Smith in the canonized account of the First Vision. Smith's statement that "great multitudes" joined the various religious denominations "in the neighborhood where I lived," is not borne out by the surviving documents. Neither the Presbyterian, Baptist, nor Methodist churches in Palmyra experienced any remarkable religious outpouring. The Methodist circuit in the area even showed net losses from 1819 to 1821. "Denominational magazines of that day were full of reports of revivals, some even devoting separate sections to them." While these magazines covered the 1816-17 and the 1824-25 revivals in the Palmyra area, there is "not a single mention of any revival taking place in the Palmyra area" in 1819-20. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #H. Michael Marquardt and Wesley P. Walters, ''Inventing Mormonism: Tradition and Historical Record'' (San Francisco: Smith Research Associates, 1994), 15-41. The quotations are from an earlier version of this study, Wesley P. Walters, "New Light on Mormon Origins from the Palmyra Revival," [http://content.lib.utah.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/dialogue&CISOPTR=5163&REC=13 ''Dialogue'' 4 (Spring 1969)], 66-67. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
In the opinion of non-Mormon author Wesley Walters, apologists for the Mormon position treat Smith's reference to the "whole district of country" as if they referred to "some kind of statewide revival, without notice of the fact that he is talking about a revival that commenced with the Methodists 'in the place where we lived' and then '''became'' general among all the sects in that region of country.'" | In the opinion of non-Mormon author Wesley Walters, apologists for the Mormon position treat Smith's reference to the "whole district of country" as if they referred to "some kind of statewide revival, without notice of the fact that he is talking about a revival that commenced with the Methodists 'in the place where we lived' and then '''became'' general among all the sects in that region of country.'" | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #Walters, 68. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
[[D. Michael Quinn]] notes a Methodist camp meeting in Palmyra in June 1818. | [[D. Michael Quinn]] notes a Methodist camp meeting in Palmyra in June 1818. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #E. Latimer, The Three Brothers: Sketches of the Lives of Rev. Aurora Seager, Rev. Micah Seager, Rev. Schuyler Seager, D.D. (New York: Phillips & Hunt, 1880), pp 21-22 as quoted in Joseph Smith's Experience of a Methodist "Camp-Meeting" in 1820, by D. Michael Quinn, 20 December 2006 | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 138: | Line 138: | ||
In 1819, a large Methodist conference was held in the town of Vienna (now [[Phelps (town), New York|Phelps]]), about fifteen miles from Palmyra, but there are no extant records of any revival meetings held in conjunction with it. | In 1819, a large Methodist conference was held in the town of Vienna (now [[Phelps (town), New York|Phelps]]), about fifteen miles from Palmyra, but there are no extant records of any revival meetings held in conjunction with it. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #{{Harv|Porter|1969|p=330}}; Walters, 68. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 151: | Line 151: | ||
In the canonized version of the First Vision (first published in 1842), his family's decision to join the Presbyterian Church occurs prior to his First Vision. | In the canonized version of the First Vision (first published in 1842), his family's decision to join the Presbyterian Church occurs prior to his First Vision. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/js_h/1/5-6#1 Joseph Smith-History 1: 5-6] | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
But Lucy Mack Smith said that she and some of her children sought comfort in the church after the death of her oldest son, Alvin, in November 1823, which if her memory was correct, would place the date of the first vision no earlier than 1824. | But Lucy Mack Smith said that she and some of her children sought comfort in the church after the death of her oldest son, Alvin, in November 1823, which if her memory was correct, would place the date of the first vision no earlier than 1824. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #After Alvin died, Lucy, "who was especially vulnerable, was aroused by the revival that invaded and fragmented Palmyra Village in the spring of 1824. Lucy said that soon after Alvin's death, Palmyra experienced 'a great revival in religion, and the whole neighborhood was very much aroused to the subject, and we among the rest flocked to meeting house to see if there was a word of comfort for us that might relieve our over charged feelings.' She eventually decided to join the Presbyterian church."{{Harv|Vogel|2004|p=58}} [[Marvin Hill]] has written, "I am inclined to agree that the religious turmoil that Smith described which led to some family members joining the Presbyterians and to much sectarian bitterness does not fit well into the 1820 context detailed by Backman....Indicating that the angel had told Smith of the plates prior to the revival, Lucy added that for a long time after Alvin's death the family could not bear nay talk about the golden plates, for the subject had been one of great interest to him and any reference to the plates stirred sorrowful memories. She said she attended the revival with hope of gaining solace for Alvin's loss. That kind of detail is just the sort that gives validity to Lucy's chronology. She would not have been likely to make up such a reaction for herself or the family nor mistake the time when it happened. I am persuaded that it was 1824 when Lucy joined the Presbyterians." {{Harv|Hill|1982|p=39}} | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
In 1845, Lucy recalled that she tried to persuade her "husband to join with them as I wished to do so myself." | In 1845, Lucy recalled that she tried to persuade her "husband to join with them as I wished to do so myself." | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #''EMD'', 1: 307 (1845). | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 202: | Line 202: | ||
Her three oldest children Hyrum, Samuel, and Sophronia also joined the Presbyterian church, but "the two Josephs resisted her enthusiasm." | Her three oldest children Hyrum, Samuel, and Sophronia also joined the Presbyterian church, but "the two Josephs resisted her enthusiasm." | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #{{Harv|Vogel|2004|p=58}}. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 214: | Line 214: | ||
Wesley Walters argues that "Smith's family could not have joined the Presbyterian Church in 1820 as a result of revival in the area, and then joined the same church again in 1823 as a result of another revival." | Wesley Walters argues that "Smith's family could not have joined the Presbyterian Church in 1820 as a result of revival in the area, and then joined the same church again in 1823 as a result of another revival." | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #Walters, 62. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 232: | Line 232: | ||
[[D. Michael Quinn]] says that Smith's account is a conflation of events over several years, a typical biographical device for streamlining the narrative. | [[D. Michael Quinn]] says that Smith's account is a conflation of events over several years, a typical biographical device for streamlining the narrative. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #[http://www.dialoguejournal.com/content/?p=35D. Michael Quinn, "Joseph Smith's ''Experience'' of a Methodist 'Camp-Meeting' in 1820], ''Dialogue Paperless'', 20 December 2006. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 248: | Line 248: | ||
Local moves of the Smith family have also been used in attempts to identify the date of the vision. In the canonized version, Joseph Smith wrote that the First Vision occurred in "the second year after our removal to Manchester." | Local moves of the Smith family have also been used in attempts to identify the date of the vision. In the canonized version, Joseph Smith wrote that the First Vision occurred in "the second year after our removal to Manchester." | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #[http://scriptures.lds.org/en/js_h/1/5 "Extracts from the History of Joseph Smith, the Prophet"]: History of the Church, Vol. 1, Chapter 1, verse 5. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 261: | Line 261: | ||
The evidence for the date of this move has been interpreted by believers as supporting 1820 and by non-believers as supporting 1824. | The evidence for the date of this move has been interpreted by believers as supporting 1820 and by non-believers as supporting 1824. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #Manchester land assessment records show an increase in assessed value of the Smith property in 1823. Because the tax assessment of the Smiths' Manchester land rose in 1823, critics argue that the Smiths completed their Manchester cabin in 1822, which suggests an approximate date of 1824 for the First Vision. Joseph Smith, Sr. was first taxed for Manchester land in 1820. In 1821 and 1822, the land was valued at $700, but in 1823, the property was assessed at $1000, which may indicate "that the Smiths had completed construction of their cabin and cleared a significant portion of their land" (Vogel, ''EMD'', 3: 443–44). In response, some Mormon apologists argue that in 1818, the Smiths mistakenly constructed a cabin 59 feet north of the actual property line (which would have been in Palmyra rather than Manchester) and the 1823 increase in the property assessment was related to the completion of a wood frame home on the Manchester side of the Palmyra-Manchester township line. The latter interpretation would lend support for dating the First Vision to 1820{{Harv|Ray|2002|pp=4–5}} For a counter argument—that there was a second cabin on the Smith property in Manchester—see Dan Vogel, ''EMD'', 3: 416-19. Vogel argues that based on archaeological and documentary evidence, the Manchester cabin was constructed prior to the Smiths' building of their frame home. "To argue for the existence of only the Jennings cabin, which the Smiths inadvertently built on the Palmyra side of the township line, one must assume that the error was perpetuated not only by the Smiths but also by authorities in both counties. However, the existence of the names of Joseph Sr., Alvin, and Hyrum on the Palmyra road lists for 1820-22 strongly argues that both the Smiths and village authorities understood that the cabin was in Palmyra township."(419) | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 277: | Line 277: | ||
The LDS Church has canonized the 1842 account in which Joseph Smith said that this vision occurred "early in the spring of 1820." | The LDS Church has canonized the 1842 account in which Joseph Smith said that this vision occurred "early in the spring of 1820." | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #Joseph Smith-History 1: 5 | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # | ||
Line 290: | Line 290: | ||
Two LDS scholars, researching weather reports and maple sugar production records, argue that the most likely exact date for the First Vision was Sunday, March 26, 1820. | Two LDS scholars, researching weather reports and maple sugar production records, argue that the most likely exact date for the First Vision was Sunday, March 26, 1820. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | #[http://johnpratt.com/items/docs/lds/meridian/2002/vision.html ''Meridian Magazine''], October 9, 2002. | ||
|authorsources=<br> | |authorsources=<br> | ||
# | # |
Background in the supernatural | A FairMormon Analysis of Wikipedia: Mormonism and Wikipedia/First Vision A work by a collaboration of authors (Link to Wikipedia article here)
|
Recorded accounts of the vision |
The name Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.. Wikipedia content is copied and made available under the GNU Free Documentation License. |
[I]t's this sort of editing that makes palpable my declarations about Mormon intent to deliberately degrade the NPOV character of this article. Backman is a Mormon apologist, and you deliberately gave no indication of that fact in your edit. Furthermore, no non-Mormon scholar believes there was any "flaming spiritual advance" in Palmyra during this period--none, zero, zip--the notion is purely Mormon, conceived for apologetic purposes.
—Wikipedia editor John Foxe to LDS editor. (3 October 2007) off-site
Smith said that his First Vision occurred in the early 1820s, when he was in his early teens
Author's sources:
}}
but his accounts mention different dates within that period. In 1832, Smith wrote that the vision had occurred "in the 16th year of [his] age" (about 1821), after he became concerned about religious matters beginning in his "twelfth year" (about 1817).
Author's sources:
At about the age of twelve years my mind become seriously imprest with regard to the all importent concerns
offor the wellfare of my immortal Soul which led me to searching the scriptures...the Lord heard my cry in the wilderness and while in the attitude of calling upon the Lord in the 16th year of my age a piller offirelight above the brightness of the sun at noon day come down from above and rested upon me...
—History of the Life of Joseph Smith (1832)
}}
In a later account Smith said the vision took place "early in the spring of 1820" after an "unusual excitement on the subject of religion" ending during his 15th year (1820).
Author's sources:
}}
LDS member and Columbia University Professor Richard Bushman wrote that Smith 'began to be concerned about religion in late 1817 or early 1818, when the aftereffects of the revival of 1816 and 1817 were still being felt."
Author's sources:
}}
LDS apologist Milton Backman wrote that religious outbreaks occurred in 1819-1820 within a fifty-mile radius of Smith's home. "Church records, newspapers, religious journals, and other contemporary sources clearly reveal that great awakenings occurred in more than fifty western New York towns or villages during the revival of 1819–1820....Primary sources also specify that great multitudes joined the Methodist, Presbyterian, and Calvinist Baptist societies in the region of country where Joseph Smith lived."
Author's sources:
}}
According to non-Mormon critics, H. Michael Marquardt and Wesley P. Walters, there is no evidence that large multi-denominational revivals took place in the immediate Palmyra area between 1819 and 1820, the period specified by Smith in the canonized account of the First Vision. Smith's statement that "great multitudes" joined the various religious denominations "in the neighborhood where I lived," is not borne out by the surviving documents. Neither the Presbyterian, Baptist, nor Methodist churches in Palmyra experienced any remarkable religious outpouring. The Methodist circuit in the area even showed net losses from 1819 to 1821. "Denominational magazines of that day were full of reports of revivals, some even devoting separate sections to them." While these magazines covered the 1816-17 and the 1824-25 revivals in the Palmyra area, there is "not a single mention of any revival taking place in the Palmyra area" in 1819-20.
Author's sources:
}}
In the opinion of non-Mormon author Wesley Walters, apologists for the Mormon position treat Smith's reference to the "whole district of country" as if they referred to "some kind of statewide revival, without notice of the fact that he is talking about a revival that commenced with the Methodists 'in the place where we lived' and then 'became general among all the sects in that region of country.'"
Author's sources:
}}
D. Michael Quinn notes a Methodist camp meeting in Palmyra in June 1818.
Author's sources:
}}
In 1819, a large Methodist conference was held in the town of Vienna (now Phelps), about fifteen miles from Palmyra, but there are no extant records of any revival meetings held in conjunction with it.
Author's sources:
}}
In the canonized version of the First Vision (first published in 1842), his family's decision to join the Presbyterian Church occurs prior to his First Vision.
Author's sources:
“I concluded that my mind would be easier if I were baptized and I found a minister who was willing to baptize me and leave me free from membership in any church after which I pursued the same course until my oldest son [Alvin] attained his 22nd year” - which took place on 11 February 1820, prior to the First Vision.[1]
A souring in the relationship between Joseph Smith and the Presbyterians seems to have occurred after the sudden and still mysterious death of his eldest brother, Alvin, on November 19, 1823.
—John Matzko, "The Encounter of the Young Joseph Smith with Presbyterianism," Dialogue 40/3 (2007), p. 77
}}
But Lucy Mack Smith said that she and some of her children sought comfort in the church after the death of her oldest son, Alvin, in November 1823, which if her memory was correct, would place the date of the first vision no earlier than 1824.
Author's sources:
}}
In 1845, Lucy recalled that she tried to persuade her "husband to join with them as I wished to do so myself."
Author's sources:
This I thought looked right and tried to persuade my Husband to joiont with them as I wished to do so myself and it was the inclination of them all except Joseph he refused from the first to attend the meeting with us. (Vogel, Early Mormon Documents 1:307)
}}
Her three oldest children Hyrum, Samuel, and Sophronia also joined the Presbyterian church, but "the two Josephs resisted her enthusiasm."
Author's sources:
}}
Wesley Walters argues that "Smith's family could not have joined the Presbyterian Church in 1820 as a result of revival in the area, and then joined the same church again in 1823 as a result of another revival."
Author's sources:
“I concluded that my mind would be easier if I were baptized and I found a minister who was willing to baptize me and leave me free from membership in any church after which I pursued the same course until my oldest son [Alvin] attained his 22nd year”
}}
D. Michael Quinn says that Smith's account is a conflation of events over several years, a typical biographical device for streamlining the narrative.
Author's sources:
I have another perspective about the fact (and it is a fact) that Smith's official narrative about 1820 included circumstances which occurred during Palmyra's revivals of 1824-25. Merging (conflating) circumstances from similar events that happened years apart will certainly confuse the historical record and will perplex anyone trying to sort out basic chronology. Nonetheless, conflation of actual circumstances from separate events is not the same as fraudulent invention of events that never occurred. Conflation also is not the combination of an actual event with a fictional event. Instead, it is very common for memoirs and autobiographies to merge similar events that actually occurred, due to the narrator's memory lapses or her/his intentional streamlining of the narrative to avoid repeating similar occurrences.[39]
[39] For example, Victor H. Matthews, A Brief History of Ancient Israel (Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press, 2002), 80 ("an unintentional conflation of events"); also Maurice Halbwachs, On Collective Memory, trans. by Lewis A. Coser (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), 83. Also see last paragraph of my note 206 for similar conflation of revivals by Mrs. Sarepta Marsh Baker and Reverend Marvin P. Blakeslee.
}}
Local moves of the Smith family have also been used in attempts to identify the date of the vision. In the canonized version, Joseph Smith wrote that the First Vision occurred in "the second year after our removal to Manchester."
Author's sources:
}}
The evidence for the date of this move has been interpreted by believers as supporting 1820 and by non-believers as supporting 1824.
Author's sources:
}}
The LDS Church has canonized the 1842 account in which Joseph Smith said that this vision occurred "early in the spring of 1820."
Author's sources:
}}
Two LDS scholars, researching weather reports and maple sugar production records, argue that the most likely exact date for the First Vision was Sunday, March 26, 1820.
Author's sources:
}}
Notes
Wikipedia references for "First Vision" |
FairMormon regularly receives queries about specific LDS-themed Wikipedia articles with requests that we somehow "fix" them. Although some individual members of FAIR may choose to edit Wikipedia articles, FairMormon as an organization does not. Controversial Wikipedia articles require constant maintenance and a significant amount of time. We prefer instead to respond to claims in the FAIR Wiki rather than fight the ongoing battle that LDS Wikipedia articles sometimes invite. From FAIR’s perspective, assertions made in LDS-themed Wikipedia articles are therefore treated just like any other critical (or, if one prefers, "anti-Mormon") work. As those articles are revised and updated, we will periodically update our reviews to match.
Editors who wish to participate in editing LDS-themed Wikipedia articles can access the project page here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement. You are not required to be LDS in order to participate—there are a number of good non-LDS editors who have made valuable contributions to these articles.
FAIR does not advocate removing any references from Wikipedia articles. The best approach to editing Wikipedia is to locate solid references to back up your position and add them rather than attempting to remove information. Individuals who intend to edit should be aware that posting information related to the real-world identities of Wikipedia editors will result in their being banned from editing Wikipedia. Attacking editors and attempting to "out" them on Wikipedia is considered very bad form. The best approach is to treat all Wikipedia editors, whether or not you agree or disagree with their approach, with respect and civility. An argumentative approach is not constructive to achieving a positive result, and will simply result in what is called an "edit war." Unfortunately, not all Wikipedia editors exhibit good faith toward other editors (see, for example, the comment above from "Duke53" or comments within these reviews made by John Foxe's sockpuppet "Hi540," both of whom repeatedly mocked LDS beliefs and LDS editors prior to their being banned.)
Although there exist editors on Wikipedia who openly declare their affiliation with the Church, they do not control Wikipedia. Ironically, some critics of the Church periodically falsely accuse Wikipedia editors of being LDS simply because they do not accept the critics' desired spin on a particular article.
Again, the answer is no. The truth is that Wikipedia is generally self-policing. Highly contentious articles do tend to draw the most passionate supporters and critics.
Although some LDS-related Wikipedia articles may appear to have a negative tone, they are in reality quite a bit more balanced than certain critical works such as One Nation Under Gods. Although many critical editors often accuse LDS-related Wikipedia articles of being "faith promoting" or claim that they are just an extension of the Sunday School manual, this is rarely the case. Few, if any, Latter-day Saints would find Wikipedia articles to be "faith promoting." Generally, the believers think that the articles are too negative and the critics believe that the articles are too positive. LDS Wikipedia articles should be informative without being overtly faith promoting. However, most of the primary sources, including the words of Joseph Smith himself, are "faith promoting." This presents a dilemma for Wikipedia editors who want to remain neutral. The unfortunate consequence is that Joseph's words are rewritten and intermixed with contradictory sources, resulting in boring and confusing prose.
We examine selected Wikipedia articles and examine them on a "claim-by-claim" basis, with links to responses in the FairMormon Answers Wiki. Wikipedia articles are constantly evolving. As a result, the analysis of each article will be updated periodically in order to bring it more into line with the current version of the article. The latest revision date may be viewed at the top of each individual section. The process by which Wikipedia articles are reviewed is the following:
The ability to quickly and easily access literature critical of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has been made significantly easier through the advent of the Internet. One of the primary sites that dominates search engine results is Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that “anyone can edit.” Wikipedia contains a large number of articles related to Mormonism that are edited by believers, critics, and neutral parties. The reliability of information regarding the Church and its history is subject to the biases of the editors who choose to modify those articles. Even if a wiki article is thoroughly sourced, editors sometimes employ source material in a manner that supports their bias. This essay explores the dynamics behind the creation of Wikipedia articles about the Church, the role that believers and critics play in that process, and the reliability of the information produced in the resulting wiki articles.
</noinclude>
We welcome your suggestions for improving the content of this FAIR Wiki article. |
Sites we recommend: |
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now