Array

Understanding pre-1978 statements about race: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
|L3=Question: How have modern Church leaders reacted to the speculations of the past regarding the reason for the priesthood ban?
|L3=Question: How have modern Church leaders reacted to the speculations of the past regarding the reason for the priesthood ban?
|L4=Question: How is it possible for a Church leader or prophet to have been influenced by racism, yet be consistent with the Lord not allowing prophets to lead the Church astray?
|L4=Question: How is it possible for a Church leader or prophet to have been influenced by racism, yet be consistent with the Lord not allowing prophets to lead the Church astray?
|L5=Question: What did Church leaders after Brigham Young think of the priesthood ban?
}}
}}
</onlyinclude>
</onlyinclude>
Line 15: Line 16:
{{:Question: How have modern Church leaders reacted to the speculations of the past regarding the reason for the priesthood ban?}}
{{:Question: How have modern Church leaders reacted to the speculations of the past regarding the reason for the priesthood ban?}}
{{:Question: How is it possible for a Church leader or prophet to have been influenced by racism, yet be consistent with the Lord not allowing prophets to lead the Church astray?}}
{{:Question: How is it possible for a Church leader or prophet to have been influenced by racism, yet be consistent with the Lord not allowing prophets to lead the Church astray?}}
{{:Question: What did Church leaders after Brigham Young think of the priesthood ban?}}
{{SeeAlso|Mormonism and racial issues/Racial statements by Church leaders|l1=Racist statements by Church leaders|Official Church doctrine and statements by Church leaders|l2=Prophets are not infallible|Blacks_and_the_priesthood/Repudiated_ideas|l3=Repudiated ideas}}
{{SeeAlso|Mormonism and racial issues/Racial statements by Church leaders|l1=Racist statements by Church leaders|Official Church doctrine and statements by Church leaders|l2=Prophets are not infallible|Blacks_and_the_priesthood/Repudiated_ideas|l3=Repudiated ideas}}



Revision as of 23:08, 4 August 2017


Understanding pre-1978 statements by members and leaders of the Church regarding the priesthood ban

Summary: Critics frequently parade justifications for the ban by past General Authorities that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord," and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.


Jump to details:


Understanding pre-1978 statements by members and leaders of the Church regarding the priesthood ban

Summary: Critics frequently parade justifications for the ban by past General Authorities that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord," and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.


Jump to details:


Understanding pre-1978 statements by members and leaders of the Church regarding the priesthood ban

Summary: Critics frequently parade justifications for the ban by past General Authorities that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord," and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.


Jump to details:


Understanding pre-1978 statements by members and leaders of the Church regarding the priesthood ban

Summary: Critics frequently parade justifications for the ban by past General Authorities that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord," and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.


Jump to details:


Understanding pre-1978 statements by members and leaders of the Church regarding the priesthood ban

Summary: Critics frequently parade justifications for the ban by past General Authorities that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord," and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.


Jump to details:


Understanding pre-1978 statements by members and leaders of the Church regarding the priesthood ban

Summary: Critics frequently parade justifications for the ban by past General Authorities that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord," and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.


Jump to details:

To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, [[../CriticalSources|click here]]

Notes



Further reading and additional sources responding to these claims