
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|L3=Question: How have modern Church leaders reacted to the speculations of the past regarding the reason for the priesthood ban? | |L3=Question: How have modern Church leaders reacted to the speculations of the past regarding the reason for the priesthood ban? | ||
|L4=Question: How is it possible for a Church leader or prophet to have been influenced by racism, yet be consistent with the Lord not allowing prophets to lead the Church astray? | |L4=Question: How is it possible for a Church leader or prophet to have been influenced by racism, yet be consistent with the Lord not allowing prophets to lead the Church astray? | ||
|L5=Question: What did Church leaders after Brigham Young think of the priesthood ban? | |||
}} | }} | ||
</onlyinclude> | </onlyinclude> | ||
Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
{{:Question: How have modern Church leaders reacted to the speculations of the past regarding the reason for the priesthood ban?}} | {{:Question: How have modern Church leaders reacted to the speculations of the past regarding the reason for the priesthood ban?}} | ||
{{:Question: How is it possible for a Church leader or prophet to have been influenced by racism, yet be consistent with the Lord not allowing prophets to lead the Church astray?}} | {{:Question: How is it possible for a Church leader or prophet to have been influenced by racism, yet be consistent with the Lord not allowing prophets to lead the Church astray?}} | ||
{{:Question: What did Church leaders after Brigham Young think of the priesthood ban?}} | |||
{{SeeAlso|Mormonism and racial issues/Racial statements by Church leaders|l1=Racist statements by Church leaders|Official Church doctrine and statements by Church leaders|l2=Prophets are not infallible|Blacks_and_the_priesthood/Repudiated_ideas|l3=Repudiated ideas}} | {{SeeAlso|Mormonism and racial issues/Racial statements by Church leaders|l1=Racist statements by Church leaders|Official Church doctrine and statements by Church leaders|l2=Prophets are not infallible|Blacks_and_the_priesthood/Repudiated_ideas|l3=Repudiated ideas}} | ||
Summary: Critics frequently parade justifications for the ban by past General Authorities that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord," and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.
Jump to details:
Summary: Critics frequently parade justifications for the ban by past General Authorities that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord," and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.
Jump to details:
Summary: Critics frequently parade justifications for the ban by past General Authorities that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord," and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.
Jump to details:
Summary: Critics frequently parade justifications for the ban by past General Authorities that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord," and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.
Jump to details:
Summary: Critics frequently parade justifications for the ban by past General Authorities that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord," and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.
Jump to details:
Summary: Critics frequently parade justifications for the ban by past General Authorities that are considered quite racist by today's standards. While these have not been officially renounced, there is no obligation for current members to accept such sentiments as the "word of the Lord," and they most certainly do not reflect the Church's current position and teachings.
Jump to details:
To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, [[../CriticalSources|click here]]
Notes
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now