Array

Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Nauvoo Polygamy/Assumptions and presumptions: Difference between revisions

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-}}\n{{FAIRAnalysisHeader\n\|title=(.*)\n\|author=(.*)\n(.*)\n(.*)\n\|previous=(.*)\n\|next=(.*)\n(.*)\n}} +|T=\1\n|A=\2\n|<=\5\n|>=\6\n}}))
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{H2\n\|L(.*)\n\|H2(.*)\n(.*)\n(.*)\n\|T +{{H1\n|L\1\n|H1\2\n\3\n\4\n|T))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FairMormon}}  
{{FairMormon}}  
{{H2
{{H1
|L={{check}}
|L={{check}}
|H2=''Nauvoo Polygamy'': Assumptions and presumptions
|H1=''Nauvoo Polygamy'': Assumptions and presumptions
|S=
|S=
|L1=
|L1=

Revision as of 03:17, 10 June 2017

Nauvoo Polygamy: Assumptions and presumptions



A FAIR Analysis of: Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Nauvoo Polygamy, a work by author: George D. Smith

Familiar anti-Mormon arguments

Joseph's guilt is always assumed

Joseph is simply assumed to be guilty of any offense.

  • He is even "haunted by the suspicion, which followed him from place to place, that he crossed moral boundaries in his friendship with other women." (p. 28)
  • In Illinois Joseph "was still hunted by law officials for old offenses." (p. 34)
  • The author assumes that Joseph "went about courting" various women, despite the total lack of evidence that any "courtships" occurred. (p. 54)