
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
MatthewBrown (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
MatthewBrown (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
'''REFUTING CRITICISM #2''' | '''REFUTING CRITICISM #2''' | ||
The 14 November 1835 First Vision diary reference is connected with an interview that the Prophet conducted with an investigator named Erastus Holmes. | The 14 November 1835 First Vision diary reference is connected with an interview that the Prophet conducted with an investigator named Erastus Holmes. Notice that the diary entry morphs as it is copied into subsequent records. | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
* "I gave him a brief relation of my experience while in my juvenile years, say from six years old up to the time I received '''my first vision''', which was when I was about fourteen years old; also the revelations that I received afterwards concerning the Book of Mormon, and a short account of the rise and progress of the Church up to this date" (''History of the Church'', 2:312). | * "I gave him a brief relation of my experience while in my juvenile years, say from six years old up to the time I received '''my first vision''', which was when I was about fourteen years old; also the revelations that I received afterwards concerning the Book of Mormon, and a short account of the rise and progress of the Church up to this date" (''History of the Church'', 2:312). | ||
If the editor of the ''History of the Church'' volumes (Brigham H. Roberts) was not drawing information directly from the original Joseph Smith diary then he may have felt that a previous editor had made an error in description - and took it upon himself to correct it. It should be noted that, for some unspecified reason, Roberts did NOT include the 9 November 1835 First Vision account in the ''History of the Church'' volumes. | |||
This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.
The capitalized word "Angels" in Joseph Smith's diary entry for 14 November 1835 has given rise to two distinct criticisms by detractors of the faith, and one misguided conclusion by Latter-day Saints.
Tanner and Tanner, Changing World of Mormonism, 156-59.
REFUTING CRITICISM #1
It is patently absurd to believe that Joseph Smith would contradict himself in less than one week while telling the same exact story in front of the same exact scribe (Warren Parrish). A careful examination of the diary entries for the 9th and 14th of November indicates that the "Angels" of the 14th are the very same "angels" mentioned on the 9th. The "angels" referred to on the 9th are definitely IN ADDITION TO the two main personages who appeared - the text says quite specifically that the angels "also" made an appearance on this ocassion. Joseph Smith is not contradicting himself but is rather providing an additional detail about the event he is describing.
REFUTING CRITICISM #2
The 14 November 1835 First Vision diary reference is connected with an interview that the Prophet conducted with an investigator named Erastus Holmes. Notice that the diary entry morphs as it is copied into subsequent records.
If the editor of the History of the Church volumes (Brigham H. Roberts) was not drawing information directly from the original Joseph Smith diary then he may have felt that a previous editor had made an error in description - and took it upon himself to correct it. It should be noted that, for some unspecified reason, Roberts did NOT include the 9 November 1835 First Vision account in the History of the Church volumes.
REFUTING THE MISGUIDED CONCLUSION
An examination of the adjoining sentences in the 9 November 1835 account (original source document) reveals that within a very short space Warren Parish thrice used the capitalized word “Angel” to refer to Moroni. Therefore, the capitalized “Angels” of the 14 November 1835 statement - which was also penned by Warren Parish - cannot be exclusively applied to Deity.
It should also be noted that one of Joseph Smith’s other contemporaneous scribes (Frederick G. Williams) regularly used the capitalized words “Angel” and “Angels” to refer to celestial beings other than Deity. And on at least one occasion Joseph Smith himself used the capitalized word “Angels” to do the same (see below).
31 July 1832 [handwriting of Frederick G. Williams]
September–November 1832 [handwriting of Frederick G. Williams]
4 January 1833 [handwriting of Frederick G. Williams]
19 December 1833 [handwriting of Frederick G. Williams]
16 August 1834 [handwriting of Frederick G. Williams]
7 October 1835 [handwriting of Frederick G. Williams]
29 October 1835 [handwriting of Warren Parish]
9 November 1835 [handwriting of Warren Parish]
14 November 1835 [handwriting of Warren Parish]
16 November 1835 [handwriting of Frederick G. Williams]
29 March 1838 [handwriting of George W. Robinson]
2 May 1838 [handwriting of James Mullholland]
21 March 1839 [handwriting of Alexander McRae and Caleb Baldwin]
4 April 1839 [handwriting of Joseph Smith]
16, 23 August 1842 [handwriting of William Clayton]
[These texts can be found in Dean C. Jessee, ed., The Personal Writings of Joseph Smith, revised edition]
None
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now