
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
:For the priesthood ''being changed'', there is made of necessity ''a change'' also of the law.({{s||Hebrews|7|12}}) {{ea}} | :For the priesthood ''being changed'', there is made of necessity ''a change'' also of the law.({{s||Hebrews|7|12}}) {{ea}} | ||
Either the priesthood is transferable (changeable), from Christ to others, or it is not. Which verse are we to believe? Let's take a closer look at this "unchangeable" priesthood: | Either the priesthood is transferable (changeable), from Christ to others, or it is not. Which verse are we to believe? Let's take a closer look at this "unchangeable" priesthood in {{s||Hebrews|7|11-24}}: | ||
* 11 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical (Aaronic) priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) | |||
(under the Aaronic priesthood, the people received the law of Moses -- an eye for an eye) | |||
* what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? | |||
(Those that hold the authority of the higher, or Melchizedek Priesthood, also hold the authority of the lessor, or the Aaronic Priesthood) | |||
* 12 For the priesthood being changed, | |||
(Here is a glaring contradiction to what the critics claim, for it clearly says the priesthood "changed." Let's continue to examine just what changed, and what the term means in | |||
context.) | |||
* there is made of necessity a change also of the law. | |||
(The Law of Moses changed, not the priesthood. In other words, when Christ came, he gave a higher law. For example, the law was no longer an "eye for an eye," it was "turn the other cheek." Along with this higher law, came a higher priesthood, which is what is meant by "changed.") | |||
* 13 For he of whom these things are spoken pertaineth to another tribe, of which no man gave attendance at the altar. 14 For it is evident that our Lord sprang out of Juda; of which tribe | |||
Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood. | |||
(Moses did not speak about the Melchizedek Priesthood and the higher law, which the Lord had, but he did speak of the Aaronic Priesthood, or the lower law.) | |||
* 15 And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest, | |||
(This priest is Jesus Christ) | |||
* 16 Who is made, not after the law of a carnal commandment, | |||
(The Law of Moses—An Eye for an Eye) | |||
* but after the power of an endless life. | |||
(The higher law, which Christ brought, which will lead us to eternal life.) | |||
* 17 For he testifieth, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec. | |||
(Christ, and the priesthood authority He holds -- the Melchizedek Priesthood -- is eternal -- without end.) | |||
* 18 For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof. | |||
(The Law of Moses was abolished with the institution of the higher Law brought by Christ.) | |||
* 19 For the law [Mosaic Law] made nothing perfect | |||
(We could not become perfect as our Father in Heaven commanded us to be by obedience to the | |||
Mosaic Law, for it does not contain the authority for the saving ordinances of salvation—the "keys" to bind in heaven and on earth, or in today's terminology, temple ordinances) | |||
* but the bringing in of a better hope did; | |||
(A better hope, or a higher law, which brought the authority for the saving ordinances) | |||
* by the which we draw nigh unto God. | |||
(It is through this higher law, by partaking of the temple ordinances, that we can "draw nigh" unto God, or become like Him, which is to "be perfect" {as God is perfect} as He commanded us—Matthew 5:48.) | |||
* 20 And inasmuch as not without an oath he was made priest: | |||
(This is in reference to the oath and covenant of the priesthood.) | |||
* 21 (For those priests | |||
(The priests of the Aaronic, or Levitical, priesthood) | |||
* were made without an oath; | |||
(The Aaronic, or lessor, priesthood, does not require an oath or covenant.) | |||
* but this [This = Higher, or Melchizedek Priesthood] with an oath | |||
:''"When a priesthood holder takes upon himself the Melchizedek Priesthood, he does so by oath | |||
and covenant. This is not so with the Aaronic Priesthood. The covenant of the Melchizedek Priesthood is that a priesthood holder will magnify his calling in the priesthood, will give diligent heed to the commandments of God, and will live by every word which proceeds "from | |||
the mouth of God" (see D&C 84:33-44). The oath of the Melchizedek Priesthood is an irrevocable promise by God to faithful priesthood holders. "All that my Father hath shall be given unto them" (see{{s||DC|84|38}}). This oath by Deity, coupled with the covenant by faithful priesthood holders, is referred to as the oath and covenant of the priesthood."''-- Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, p.223) | |||
* by him that said unto him, The Lord sware and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec:) | |||
(The Melchizedek Priesthood is eternal) | |||
* 22 By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament. 23 And they truly were many priests, because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death: 24 But this man (Jesus Christ), because he continueth ever, (Eternal) hath an unchangeable (Eternal) priesthood. | |||
(In context, this verse (24) that critics use to try to argue against the priesthood, is saying that since Jesus Christ is eternal, so is the authority He has. It is this same authority that Christ passed on to his Apostles, and they, passed on to others in the Church.) | |||
Answers portal |
Early Christianity & Apostasy |
![]() |
![]() |
---|
Apostasy Authority: and Priesthood
Doctrinal shift:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.
Critics claim that only Jesus held the priesthood, and that such priesthood was not 'transferable' to members of the Church.
Search for the Truth DVD (2007) Resources
One of the things that people who are opposed to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints criticize us for is our belief in the Priesthood. Latter-day Saints believe the Priesthood is the authority God has given man to perform the ordinances (e.g. baptism, sacrament, sealing, etc.) that Jesus has declared to be necessary, in order that the atonement may have full effect in our lives.
Our critics oppose the Priesthood, claiming it does not exist among mortals, as Jesus Christ is the only one with the Priesthood. Unfortunately for them, the Bible contradicts them.
It is understandable that creedal Christians desperately need the priesthood, as understood by Latter-day Saints, to be non-existent today. The whole idea of authority, direct from God, being necessary for the saving ordinances of mankind, completely undermines and destroys the traditionally accepted doctrine that one is "saved by faith alone." It also completely destroys their own claims to authority, since they are the result of a break-off from the Roman Catholic faith.
If the Catholics did not have the priesthood authority, then the Protestants cannot have taken it with them. Hence, they are anxious to claim a "priesthood of all believers," or claim priesthood isn't needed at all.
If the Catholics did have the authority, then Protestants were wrong to leave in the first place.
When Christ was on the earth during His mortal ministry, He set up aspecific organization (called the Church).
Does it make sense that if Jesus Christ organized a Church, that the true Church would have the same positions today? What are some of the offices or positions in the church Christ established?
(12 Apostles collectively, and the one leading the church with his counselors -- Peter, James, and John)
("Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect." Matthew 5:48)
(the members of the Church -- interesting that they are called Saints, just as we are called Latter-day Saints today.),
(The administration and performing the ordinances of the Church),
(Even though all Christians claim to believe in Christ, and the Bible, there certainly is no unity of faith or doctrine, therefore these offices are still needed.)
(unto a perfect man—NOT some incomprehensible being as the creeds declare.)
(The creeds came by councils of men, not a singular pronouncement of revelation by a prophet of God, as all other scripturally based doctrines are. The creeds directly contradict scripture. The creeds are not declared to be scripture. The creeds have not been declared to have been given by revelation. The creeds came about by political power struggles. Hence, the creeds are a wind of doctrine.),
So how can we tell true teachers? First, they will have authority (priesthood) directly from God. Christ was given the priesthood authority from God the Father.
to have life in himself; 27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man. (John 5꞉26-27.)(emphasis added)
The works that Christ performed were by this priesthood authority:
Christ passed on this very same authority to His apostles.
Luke 9:1-2
This authority is necessary in order to preach the gospel.
The apostles ordained others with this authority:
For this cause left I thee in Crete, that thou shouldest set in order the things that are wanting, and ordain elders in every city, as I had appointed thee...{Titus 1꞉5)(emphasis added)
This authority was passed directly from God the Father, to Jesus Christ, to the Apostles, to the Elders, and to others. It was a priesthood which any worthy man could have, if called. It was also necessary for the stablishment of the Church. Christ left this priesthood authority on he earth when He left, so that the Church could still function.
Mark 13:34
In fact, the church would be known as the true church because of the priesthood, for so the church is described in scripture.
This priesthood authority is sacred and cannot be bought.
may receive the Holy Ghost. 20 But Peter said unto him, Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money.(Acts 8꞉18-20) (emphasis added)
We cannot choose this priesthood authority for ourselves.
As shown above, you can't buy it, you can't take it upon yourself, and you can't choose for yourself to have it. So how can we obtain the priesthood?
How was Aaron called? He was called by Moses—as God instructed Moses—in other words, Aaron did not decide to accept this for himself, but was called by Moses, who was instructed by the Lord, who has authority over him.
Most critics of the LDS Church rest most of their argument against the LDS doctrine of priesthood on Hebrews 7꞉24:
The critics of the LDS Church interpret the word "unchangeable" as meaning non-transferable. Therefore, they say, the Priesthood that Christ held (the Melchizedek Priesthood) could not be transferred to anyone. In fact, a look at Strong's would indicate this is true:
But is this the correct interpretation? If so, there is a glaring contradiction within this very chapter, for verse twelve says the priesthood has changed:
Either the priesthood is transferable (changeable), from Christ to others, or it is not. Which verse are we to believe? Let's take a closer look at this "unchangeable" priesthood in Hebrews 7꞉11-24:
(under the Aaronic priesthood, the people received the law of Moses -- an eye for an eye)
(Those that hold the authority of the higher, or Melchizedek Priesthood, also hold the authority of the lessor, or the Aaronic Priesthood)
(Here is a glaring contradiction to what the critics claim, for it clearly says the priesthood "changed." Let's continue to examine just what changed, and what the term means in context.)
(The Law of Moses changed, not the priesthood. In other words, when Christ came, he gave a higher law. For example, the law was no longer an "eye for an eye," it was "turn the other cheek." Along with this higher law, came a higher priesthood, which is what is meant by "changed.")
Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood.
(Moses did not speak about the Melchizedek Priesthood and the higher law, which the Lord had, but he did speak of the Aaronic Priesthood, or the lower law.)
(This priest is Jesus Christ)
(The Law of Moses—An Eye for an Eye)
(The higher law, which Christ brought, which will lead us to eternal life.)
(Christ, and the priesthood authority He holds -- the Melchizedek Priesthood -- is eternal -- without end.)
(The Law of Moses was abolished with the institution of the higher Law brought by Christ.)
(We could not become perfect as our Father in Heaven commanded us to be by obedience to the Mosaic Law, for it does not contain the authority for the saving ordinances of salvation—the "keys" to bind in heaven and on earth, or in today's terminology, temple ordinances)
(A better hope, or a higher law, which brought the authority for the saving ordinances)
(It is through this higher law, by partaking of the temple ordinances, that we can "draw nigh" unto God, or become like Him, which is to "be perfect" {as God is perfect} as He commanded us—Matthew 5:48.)
(This is in reference to the oath and covenant of the priesthood.)
(The priests of the Aaronic, or Levitical, priesthood)
(The Aaronic, or lessor, priesthood, does not require an oath or covenant.)
and covenant. This is not so with the Aaronic Priesthood. The covenant of the Melchizedek Priesthood is that a priesthood holder will magnify his calling in the priesthood, will give diligent heed to the commandments of God, and will live by every word which proceeds "from the mouth of God" (see D&C 84:33-44). The oath of the Melchizedek Priesthood is an irrevocable promise by God to faithful priesthood holders. "All that my Father hath shall be given unto them" (seeDC 84꞉38). This oath by Deity, coupled with the covenant by faithful priesthood holders, is referred to as the oath and covenant of the priesthood."-- Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, p.223)
(The Melchizedek Priesthood is eternal)
(In context, this verse (24) that critics use to try to argue against the priesthood, is saying that since Jesus Christ is eternal, so is the authority He has. It is this same authority that Christ passed on to his Apostles, and they, passed on to others in the Church.)
Jump to Subtopic:
Jump to Subtopic:
Jump to details:
Summary: Do the Early Church Fathers and other post-Biblical documents shed any light on the apostasy?
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Jump to Subtopic:
Summary: Do other Christian denominations believe that no other church on earth is complete, or is this an arrogant belief assumed only by the "Mormons"?
Jump to details:
Summary: Is Jesus' teaching about "the gates of hell" prevailing against "the rock" inconsistent with a belief in a universal apostasy?
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Jump to Subtopic:
Summary: If there were some people who would have accepted the Gospel as taught in Mormonism, why did God allow the earthly Church to pass from the earth?
Jump to details:
Summary: What does the apostasy doctrine mean with respect to the relationship of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to other branches of Christianity?
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Jump to Subtopic:
Jump to Subtopic:
Jump to Subtopic:
Jump to Subtopic:
Apostasy FairMormon articles on-line |
FairMormon Priesthood FairMormon articles on-line |
Key sources |
|
|||
FAIR links |
|
|||
Online |
|
|||
Video |
|
|||
Print |
|
|||
Navigators |
Priesthood links to articles |
Apostasy printed materials |
Priesthood printed materials |
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now