Array

Doctrine and Covenants/Criticism: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
}}
}}
</onlyinclude>
</onlyinclude>
{{Articles Footer 1}}
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
[[en:Doctrine and Covenants/Criticism]]
[[en:Doctrine and Covenants/Criticism]]
[[es:Doctrina y Convenios/Crítica]]
[[es:Doctrina y Convenios/Crítica]]
[[pt:Doutrina e Convênios/Crítica]]
[[pt:Doutrina e Convênios/Crítica]]

Revision as of 05:13, 26 May 2017


Criticism of the Doctrine and Covenants

Contradiction between Section 132 and Jacob 2

Summary: Critics note that D&C 132 speaks favorably about some Old Testament practitioners of plural marriage, while Jacob 2 is negative. Some claim that this discrepancy is a contradiction, suggesting that Joseph Smith's ideas about plural marriage changed, and the Book of Mormon and Doctrine and Covenants are not inspired.

D&C 84 states that God cannot be seen without priesthood

Summary: How could Joseph Smith has seen God the Father and Jesus Christ during the First Vision if he had not yet received the priesthood?