
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
m (→Answer) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The initial wordprint studies by Larsen, Rencher, and Layton were critiqued in Ernest H. Taves, ''Trouble Enough: Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon'' (Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1984), 225-60. John Hilton characterized Teves' review as "fundamentally flawed," and noted that his effort "therefore did nothing to add to or detract from their work." (Hilton, 1990). | The initial wordprint studies by Larsen, Rencher, and Layton were critiqued in Ernest H. Taves, ''Trouble Enough: Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon'' (Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1984), 225-60. John Hilton characterized Teves' review as "fundamentally flawed," and noted that his effort "therefore did nothing to add to or detract from their work." (Hilton, 1990). | ||
An LDS author considered some of Larsen, Rencher, and Layton's work in D. James Croft, "Book of Mormon 'Wordprints' Reexamined," ''Sunstone'' 6 (March-April 1981): 15-21. Croft pointed out some flaws in their assumptions, and was cautious about | An LDS author considered some of Larsen, Rencher, and Layton's work in D. James Croft, "Book of Mormon 'Wordprints' Reexamined," ''Sunstone'' 6 (March-April 1981): 15-21. Croft pointed out some flaws in their assumptions, and was cautious about whether wordprint evidence should be accepted or rejected as it then stood. | ||
===John Hilton and the Berkeley Group=== | ===John Hilton and the Berkeley Group=== |
This page is based on an answer to a question submitted to the FAIR web site, or a frequently asked question.
What are wordprints? What do they have to do with the Book of Mormon?
Intro to Larsen et al
The initial wordprint studies by Larsen, Rencher, and Layton were critiqued in Ernest H. Taves, Trouble Enough: Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon (Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1984), 225-60. John Hilton characterized Teves' review as "fundamentally flawed," and noted that his effort "therefore did nothing to add to or detract from their work." (Hilton, 1990).
An LDS author considered some of Larsen, Rencher, and Layton's work in D. James Croft, "Book of Mormon 'Wordprints' Reexamined," Sunstone 6 (March-April 1981): 15-21. Croft pointed out some flaws in their assumptions, and was cautious about whether wordprint evidence should be accepted or rejected as it then stood.
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now