Array

Social pressure and the priesthood ban: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
{{:Question: Was the priesthood ban lifted as the result of social or government pressure?}}
{{:Question: Was the priesthood ban lifted as the result of social or government pressure?}}


== ==
{{:Source:Gospel Topics:Race and the Priesthood:Church authorities encountered faithful black and mixed-ancestry Mormons who had contributed financially and in other ways to the building of the São Paulo temple}}
{{ChurchResponseBar
|link=http://www.lds.org/topics/race-and-the-priesthood?lang=eng
|title=Race and the Priesthood
|publication=Gospel Topics
|date=2013
|summary=Brazil in particular presented many challenges. Unlike the United States and South Africa where legal and de facto racism led to deeply segregated societies, Brazil prided itself on its open, integrated, and mixed racial heritage. In 1975, the Church announced that a temple would be built in São Paulo, Brazil. As the temple construction proceeded, Church authorities encountered faithful black and mixed-ancestry Mormons who had contributed financially and in other ways to the building of the São Paulo temple, a sanctuary they realized they would not be allowed to enter once it was completed. Their sacrifices, as well as the conversions of thousands of Nigerians and Ghanaians in the 1960s and early 1970s, moved Church leaders.
}}
 
 
</onlyinclude>
</onlyinclude>
{{CriticalSources}}
{{CriticalSources}}

Revision as of 06:00, 7 November 2014

Did social pressure play a role in lifting the priesthood ban?