FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Array
Criticism of Mormonism/Books/One Nation Under Gods/Use of sources/Warren Parrish and Kirtland Safety Society "revelation": Difference between revisions
(m) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Warren Parrish would apostatize, and later claim on 15 February 1838 (a little more than one year after the fact): | Warren Parrish would apostatize, and later claim on 15 February 1838 (a little more than one year after the fact): | ||
:I have listened to [the Prophet] with feelings of no ordinary kind when he declared that the audible voice of God instructed him to establish a Banking-Anti-Banking Institution, which, like Aaron's rod, should swallow up all other Banks…and grow and flourish and spread from the rivers to the ends of the earth, and survive when all others should be laid in ruins. | :I have listened to [the Prophet] with feelings of no ordinary kind when he declared that the audible voice of God instructed him to establish a Banking-Anti-Banking Institution, which, like Aaron's rod, should swallow up all other Banks…and grow and flourish and spread from the rivers to the ends of the earth, and survive when all others should be laid in ruins.<ref> Letter published in the 15 Feb. 1838 ''Painesville Republican'', re-printed in ''The Ohio Repository'', 22 Mar. 1838; cited in Van Wagoner, ''Sidney Rigdon'', 194.</ref> | ||
Fortunately, there is a contemporaneous account from Wilford Woodruff, who wrote in his diary on the very day that Joseph spoke -- 6 January 1837: | Fortunately, there is a contemporaneous account from Wilford Woodruff, who wrote in his diary on the very day that Joseph spoke -- 6 January 1837: | ||
:I also herd President Joseph Smith jr. declare in the presence of F Williams, D. Whitmer, S. Smith, '''W. Parrish''', & others in the Deposit Office that he had receieved{{cs}} that morning the Word of the Lord upon the Subject of the Kirtland Safety Society. He was alone in a room by himself & he had not ownly the voice of the Spirit upon the Subject but even an ''audable voice''. '''He did not tell us at that time what the LORD said upon the subject''' but remarked that '''if we would give heed''' to the Commandments the Lord had given this morning all would be well (spelling and capitalization in original, italics and emphasis added).{{ | :I also herd President Joseph Smith jr. declare in the presence of F Williams, D. Whitmer, S. Smith, '''W. Parrish''', & others in the Deposit Office that he had receieved{{cs}} that morning the Word of the Lord upon the Subject of the Kirtland Safety Society. He was alone in a room by himself & he had not ownly the voice of the Spirit upon the Subject but even an ''audable voice''. '''He did not tell us at that time what the LORD said upon the subject''' but remarked that '''if we would give heed''' to the Commandments the Lord had given this morning all would be well (spelling and capitalization in original, italics and emphasis added).<ref>{{WWJ1|vol=1|start=120}}</ref> | ||
The similarities and differences in these accounts are striking. In both reports, Joseph said that the Lord has spoken to him in "an audible voice." Parrish was present at the event described by Woodruff. Yet, Woodruff indicated that Joseph did ''not'' tell them what the Lord had said, other than to make a ''conditional'' promise if they were all obedient. | The similarities and differences in these accounts are striking. In both reports, Joseph said that the Lord has spoken to him in "an audible voice." Parrish was present at the event described by Woodruff. Yet, Woodruff indicated that Joseph did ''not'' tell them what the Lord had said, other than to make a ''conditional'' promise if they were all obedient. | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
The Kirtland Safety Society was in serious trouble by the spring of 1837. Joseph Smith had resigned from it by 8 June 1837. Yet, in the same month of June, Parrish was called to testify in the case of Grandison Newell vs. Joseph Smith. Newell put Parrish on the stand but | The Kirtland Safety Society was in serious trouble by the spring of 1837. Joseph Smith had resigned from it by 8 June 1837. Yet, in the same month of June, Parrish was called to testify in the case of Grandison Newell vs. Joseph Smith. Newell put Parrish on the stand but | ||
:…when [Warren Parrish was] asked by the lawyers, "Do you know of anything in the character or conduct of Mr. Smith which is unworthy of his profession as a man of God?" the answer was, "I do not." {{ | :…when [Warren Parrish was] asked by the lawyers, "Do you know of anything in the character or conduct of Mr. Smith which is unworthy of his profession as a man of God?" the answer was, "I do not."<ref>{{EJ|vol=1|num=4|date=August 1838|pagegs=58}}</ref> | ||
So, by this date Parrish knew that the bank was in serious trouble. He was also hostile to Joseph (on May 29 he would bring high council charges against him for "lying...extortion...and...speaking disrespectfully against his brethren behind their backs."{{ | So, by this date Parrish knew that the bank was in serious trouble. He was also hostile to Joseph (on May 29 he would bring high council charges against him for "lying...extortion...and...speaking disrespectfully against his brethren behind their backs."<ref>Orson Pratt and Lyman Johnson, "Charges Against Joseph Smith, Jr., n.d.," Newel K. Whitney Collection, Special Collections, BYU; cited in {{CriticalWork:Van Wagoner:Sidney Rigdon|pages=196}}</ref> He was in court under oath, called by the prosecution because they thought he would help their case against Joseph Smith, and yet he said he knew ''nothing'' in Joseph's conduct or character which suggested his profession as a man of God was unfounded. | ||
Why did Parrish not tell the court about the supposed "revelation" which he would cite about eight months later? Quite simply because (as the Woodruff diary shows) Joseph reported the contents of no such revelation. This points to a February 1838 fabrication by Parrish. Would Parrish lie? He later brought charges against Sidney Rigdon for, among other things, "expressing an unbelief in the revelations of God, both old and new." | Why did Parrish not tell the court about the supposed "revelation" which he would cite about eight months later? Quite simply because (as the Woodruff diary shows) Joseph reported the contents of no such revelation. This points to a February 1838 fabrication by Parrish. Would Parrish lie? He later brought charges against Sidney Rigdon for, among other things, "expressing an unbelief in the revelations of God, both old and new."<ref>Vault-Ms 76, box 2, fd 2, Special Collections, BYU; cited in Van Wagoner, ''Sidney Rigdon'', 196.</ref> To charge Sidney Rigdon—former Campbellite preacher, student of the Bible, and stirring biblical orator—with disbelieving the revelations of God is laughable nonsense. It is one more bit of evidence that Parrish's word, by this point in time, cannot be trusted. | ||
== | == == | ||
{{Endnotes label}} | |||
<references /> | |||
Revision as of 19:59, 7 June 2014
Warren Parrish and Kirtland Safety Society "revelation"
| Joseph owned 144 acres in Kirtland | A FAIR Analysis of: One Nation Under Gods A work by author: Richard Abanes
|
Joseph Smith's Narcissism |
Author's Claims
One Nation under Gods, page 136 (hardback and paperback)
- The author paraphrases Brodie's assertion that "The bank was said to have been established by a revelation from God...."
Author's Sources
Endnote 51, page 534 (hardback); page 532 (paperback)
- Fawn M. Brodie, No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1945), 195. ( Index of claims ), citing Warren Parrish, letter dated March 6, 1838, Zion's Watchman, March 24, 1838
- Tanner and Tanner, The Mormon Kingdom vol. 1, 14.
Answer
Warren Parrish would apostatize, and later claim on 15 February 1838 (a little more than one year after the fact):
- I have listened to [the Prophet] with feelings of no ordinary kind when he declared that the audible voice of God instructed him to establish a Banking-Anti-Banking Institution, which, like Aaron's rod, should swallow up all other Banks…and grow and flourish and spread from the rivers to the ends of the earth, and survive when all others should be laid in ruins.[1]
Fortunately, there is a contemporaneous account from Wilford Woodruff, who wrote in his diary on the very day that Joseph spoke -- 6 January 1837:
- I also herd President Joseph Smith jr. declare in the presence of F Williams, D. Whitmer, S. Smith, W. Parrish, & others in the Deposit Office that he had receieved [check spelling] that morning the Word of the Lord upon the Subject of the Kirtland Safety Society. He was alone in a room by himself & he had not ownly the voice of the Spirit upon the Subject but even an audable voice. He did not tell us at that time what the LORD said upon the subject but remarked that if we would give heed to the Commandments the Lord had given this morning all would be well (spelling and capitalization in original, italics and emphasis added).[2]
The similarities and differences in these accounts are striking. In both reports, Joseph said that the Lord has spoken to him in "an audible voice." Parrish was present at the event described by Woodruff. Yet, Woodruff indicated that Joseph did not tell them what the Lord had said, other than to make a conditional promise if they were all obedient.
Why should we believe the later, hostile report of Parrish (who had something to gain by lying) when it doesn't match the contemporary report written before there was any problem with the bank?
Further evidence against Parrish
The Kirtland Safety Society was in serious trouble by the spring of 1837. Joseph Smith had resigned from it by 8 June 1837. Yet, in the same month of June, Parrish was called to testify in the case of Grandison Newell vs. Joseph Smith. Newell put Parrish on the stand but
- …when [Warren Parrish was] asked by the lawyers, "Do you know of anything in the character or conduct of Mr. Smith which is unworthy of his profession as a man of God?" the answer was, "I do not."[3]
So, by this date Parrish knew that the bank was in serious trouble. He was also hostile to Joseph (on May 29 he would bring high council charges against him for "lying...extortion...and...speaking disrespectfully against his brethren behind their backs."[4] He was in court under oath, called by the prosecution because they thought he would help their case against Joseph Smith, and yet he said he knew nothing in Joseph's conduct or character which suggested his profession as a man of God was unfounded.
Why did Parrish not tell the court about the supposed "revelation" which he would cite about eight months later? Quite simply because (as the Woodruff diary shows) Joseph reported the contents of no such revelation. This points to a February 1838 fabrication by Parrish. Would Parrish lie? He later brought charges against Sidney Rigdon for, among other things, "expressing an unbelief in the revelations of God, both old and new."[5] To charge Sidney Rigdon—former Campbellite preacher, student of the Bible, and stirring biblical orator—with disbelieving the revelations of God is laughable nonsense. It is one more bit of evidence that Parrish's word, by this point in time, cannot be trusted.
Notes
- ↑ Letter published in the 15 Feb. 1838 Painesville Republican, re-printed in The Ohio Repository, 22 Mar. 1838; cited in Van Wagoner, Sidney Rigdon, 194.
- ↑ Wilford Woodruff, Wilford Woodruff’s Journal, 9 vols., ed., Scott G. Kenny (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1985), 1:120. ISBN 0941214133.
- ↑ Elder's Journal 1 no. 4 (August 1838).
- ↑ Orson Pratt and Lyman Johnson, "Charges Against Joseph Smith, Jr., n.d.," Newel K. Whitney Collection, Special Collections, BYU; cited in Richard S. Van Wagoner, Sidney Rigdon: A Portrait of Religious Excess (Salt Lake City, Signature Books, 2005), 196. (Reviews)
- ↑ Vault-Ms 76, box 2, fd 2, Special Collections, BYU; cited in Van Wagoner, Sidney Rigdon, 196.