Array

Question: What are the responses to critical arguments concerning the name "Nahom" in the Book of Mormon?: Difference between revisions

(m)
(m)
Line 6: Line 6:


{{UnderConstructionSuggestions}}
{{UnderConstructionSuggestions}}
== ==
{{Response label}}
== ==
{{InterpreterBar
|link=http://www.mormoninterpreter.com/book-of-mormon-minimalists-and-the-nhm-inscriptions-a-response-to-dan-vogel/
|title=Book of Mormon Minimalists and the NHM Inscriptions: A Response to Dan Vogel
|author=Neal Rappleye and Stephen O. Smoot
|authorlink=http://www.mormoninterpreter.com/author/nealr/
|vol=8
|date=2014
|start=157
|end=185
|summary=Biblical “minimalists” have sought to undermine or de-emphasize the significance of the Tel Dan inscription attesting to the existence of the “house of David.” Similarly, those who might be called Book of Mormon “minimalists” such as Dan Vogel have marshaled evidence to try to make the nhm inscriptions from south Arabia, corresponding to the Book of Mormon Nahom, seem as irrelevant as possible. We show why the nhm inscriptions still stand as impressive evidence for the historicity of the Book of Mormon.
}}


{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}

Revision as of 16:58, 25 January 2014

The name "Nahom" in the Book of Mormon: A Response to Critical arguments

Questions


This page is still under construction. We welcome any suggestions for improving the content of this FAIR Answers Wiki page.

Detailed Analysis

Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship, "Book of Mormon Minimalists and the NHM Inscriptions: A Response to Dan Vogel"

Neal Rappleye and Stephen O. Smoot,  Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship, (2014)

Biblical “minimalists” have sought to undermine or de-emphasize the significance of the Tel Dan inscription attesting to the existence of the “house of David.” Similarly, those who might be called Book of Mormon “minimalists” such as Dan Vogel have marshaled evidence to try to make the nhm inscriptions from south Arabia, corresponding to the Book of Mormon Nahom, seem as irrelevant as possible. We show why the nhm inscriptions still stand as impressive evidence for the historicity of the Book of Mormon.

Click here to view the complete article