FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Array
User:InProgress/Website reviews/R: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
* The plates were "a mixture of gold and copper" - William Smith, ''The Saints' Herald'' (4 October 1884): 644. | * The plates were "a mixture of gold and copper" - William Smith, ''The Saints' Herald'' (4 October 1884): 644. | ||
|link=Book_of_Mormon/Translation/Description_of_the_plates | |link=Book_of_Mormon/Translation/Description_of_the_plates | ||
| | |subject=Description of the plates | ||
|summary=How did the many witnesses describe the plates and related items? | |summary=How did the many witnesses describe the plates and related items? | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 02:36, 30 April 2012
A FAIR Analysis of: MormonThink A work by author: Anonymous
|
A FAIR Analysis of MormonThink page "Joseph Running with the Plates"
FAIRMORMON'S VIEW OF THE CRITICS' CONCLUSIONS
The positions that this MormonThink article appears to take are the following:
FAIRMORMON'S RESPONSE AND SUPPORTING DATA
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
The critics say that Joseph could not have possibly transported and worked with these heavy 200 pound plates. Also pure gold would be too malleable to be useful for permanent engraving....In this instance [MormonThink] disagree[s] with the critics' premise. We don't feel that the plates had to be made of solid gold. Although the plates are often referred to as 'gold plates' they didn't necessary have to be made of pure gold. The witnesses described them as having the 'appearance of gold'....We do however, wonder why the angel would give Joseph specific instruction that he could not use the plates for personal gain if they were not made of gold....So using the statements of the witnesses, it seems logical that the plates weighed about 50 pounds give or take 10 pounds. We summarily reject the critics' arguments that the plates must have weighed 200 pounds.
FairMormon commentary
- A solid block of gold of the dimensions described by Joseph Smith and the witnesses would weigh 200 pounds, but does not account for any air space between leaves. The plates were not a solid block of gold. Pure gold is too soft to create such plates. It makes you think—were the plates made of a lighter alloy?
- William Smith, who MormonThink was happy to quote as saying he only saw the plates covered (and which MormonThink tried to insist meant that no one had claimed to have seen the uncovered plates) specifically said the plates were a mixture of copper and gold—which is much lighter than pure gold. Why don't they mention this statement of William's?
- As antiquarian artifacts, the plates would have been quite valuable even if not made of a precious metal—and, it didn't much matter whether the plates were pure gold, but whether Joseph or others who might be tempted to use them for gain thought they were.
Quotes to consider
- The plates were "a mixture of gold and copper" - William Smith, The Saints' Herald (4 October 1884): 644.
Additional information
- Description of the plates—How did the many witnesses describe the plates and related items? (Link)
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
How could any man, especially a man that had a slight limp run with a 50 pound weight and avoid capture by three assailants? The journey through the woods was about 3 miles as Joseph indicated above. It's inconceivable that anybody could run carrying a 50 lb. set of metal plates, jumping over logs and such and be able to outrun three men for some 1 to 2 miles that were bent on taking the plates from Joseph. And all this from a young man that had a slight limp and would have difficulty running at a high speed for a long distance -especially carrying a 50 lb. weight.
FairMormon commentary
Quotes to consider
- Several people testified of the plates' weight, and they all knew Joseph Smith. None of them found the story inherently impossible. None of them challenged Joseph's tale—including his family who both knew him best and handled the plates.
- FAIR has reviewed everything written about the Book of Mormon during Joseph's lifetime. None of the many hostile accounts say anything about this—isn't it possible that people of Joseph's day understood that it was not inherently implausible.
- MormonThink hopes we ignore the fact that if Joseph's account is true that God could well have blessed him beyond his own abilities. That said, Joseph was well-known for his strength and ability to do serious amounts of physical work. He was also a well-known champion wrestler and stick-puller—maybe he's in better physical shape that MormonThink wants to grant?
- What evidence is there that Joseph's "slight limp" made it hard for him to run at high speed?
- In a culture and time when all work is done by either human or animal muscle power, frontier farmers like the Smiths were likely in far better physical condition than most twenty-first century westerners.
- Did you know that traditional Chinese martial artists recommend training in "hilly terrain" to build strength, and running with a rucksack containing 56 lbs for men, for a distance of at least 5 miles? (They emphasize that farmlife made such things doable anciently.) Maybe MormonThink should let them know this weight and distance is impossible.
- During World War II, a Canadian infantry sergeant carried his friend on his shoulders for half a mile, while under continuous enemy fire. A wounded man weighs considerably more than fifty pounds, and he probably didn't loiter while under severe fire.
- Hitler's SS trained to run 3 km (1.87 miles) in twenty minutes with full gear.[1]
- Israel Defense Force officer candidates must past the "Loren test"—"scaling a two-meter wall, climbing a three-meter wall, completing an obstacle course, running two miles, and then target-shooting — all in under 22 minutes," and done in full battle gear.
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
If the story is but a 'tall tale', regardless of its origins, it should not be taught in church as a true historical account, as we have been taught growing up in the church, just to provide a faith-promoting event.
FairMormon commentary
- We have no reason to think it a "tall tale" save MormonThink's "argument from incredulity"—they say it can't be done, so therefore it's a tall tale. But, people clear can and do do what Joseph claimed he did.
- MormonThink needs to do better than this before labeling a "tall tale" just because they want a faith-destroying non-story.
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
On their old website, MormonThink claims...
FairMormon commentary
== Notes ==