
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
* The Preaching of Peter{{ref|pr2}} | * The Preaching of Peter{{ref|pr2}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Roman Christians (A.D. 200)||Included in canon: | |Roman Christians (circa A.D. 200)||Included in canon: | ||
*Revelation of Peter | *Revelation of Peter | ||
*Wisdom of Solomon | *Wisdom of Solomon | ||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
*2 Peter | *2 Peter | ||
*3 John{{ref|ash1}} | *3 John{{ref|ash1}} | ||
|- | |||
|Origen (''date'')||Included in canon: | |Origen (''date'')||Included in canon: | ||
* Epistle of Barnabas | * Epistle of Barnabas | ||
* Shepherd of Hermas{{ref|pr3}} | * Shepherd of Hermas{{ref|pr3}} | ||
Excluded from canon:<br> | |||
*James | |||
*Jude | |||
*2 John | |||
*Those disputed by Rome(see above){{ref|ash2}} | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Syriac Peshitta||Excluded from the canon: | |Syriac Peshitta||Excluded from the canon: | ||
Line 116: | Line 122: | ||
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
1. Biblical writers considered writings not in the present canon to be scriptural writings. | 1. Biblical writers considered writings not in the present canon to be scriptural writings.<br> | ||
2. Christian groups do not agree on what constitutes the Biblical canon—any claim that the canon is closed, complete, and sufficient must answer: | 2. Christian groups do not agree on what constitutes the Biblical canon—any claim that the canon is closed, complete, and sufficient must answer: | ||
: a) ''which'' canon? | : a) ''which'' canon? | ||
Line 126: | Line 132: | ||
#{{note|enochwide1}} E. Isaac, "1 (Ethiopic Apocalypse of) Enoch," in ''The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha'', ed. J. H. Charlesworth, 2 vols, (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1983), 1:10; cited in {{ComparingLDSBeliefs}} | #{{note|enochwide1}} E. Isaac, "1 (Ethiopic Apocalypse of) Enoch," in ''The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha'', ed. J. H. Charlesworth, 2 vols, (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1983), 1:10; cited in {{ComparingLDSBeliefs}} | ||
#{{note|pr2}} {{ComparingLDSBeliefs}} | #{{note|pr2}} {{ComparingLDSBeliefs}} | ||
#{{note|ash1}} Mike Ash, "Is the Bible Complete?": 1. {{pdflink|url=http://www.fairlds.org/FAIR_Brochures/Is_the_Bible_Complete.pdf}} | |||
#{{note|pr3}} {{ComparingLDSBeliefs}}; citing Clyde L. Manschreck, ''A History of Christianity in the World'', 2d. ed. (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1985), 52. | #{{note|pr3}} {{ComparingLDSBeliefs}}; citing Clyde L. Manschreck, ''A History of Christianity in the World'', 2d. ed. (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1985), 52. | ||
#{{note|ash2}} Mike Ash, "Is the Bible Complete?": 1. {{pdflink|url=http://www.fairlds.org/FAIR_Brochures/Is_the_Bible_Complete.pdf}} | |||
#{{note|syriac1}} {{FR-11-2-4}}; citing Kurt Aland, ''Nestle-Aland Greek-English New Testament'', 5th ed. (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1990), 769–75; see also Craig A. Evans, ''Noncanonical Writings and New Testament Interpretation'' (Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1992), 190–219, who provides almost 1,500 quotations, allusions, and parallels between noncanonical sources and the New Testament. | #{{note|syriac1}} {{FR-11-2-4}}; citing Kurt Aland, ''Nestle-Aland Greek-English New Testament'', 5th ed. (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1990), 769–75; see also Craig A. Evans, ''Noncanonical Writings and New Testament Interpretation'' (Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1992), 190–219, who provides almost 1,500 quotations, allusions, and parallels between noncanonical sources and the New Testament. | ||
#{{note|armenian1}}{{FR-11-2-4}} | #{{note|armenian1}}{{FR-11-2-4}} |
| |||||||||
|
This page is based on an answer to a question submitted to the FAIR web site, or a frequently asked question.
I've heard about "lost scripture" mentioned in the Bible. What is this about, and what implications does it have for the doctrine of Biblical inerrancy and sufficiency?
So called "lost scripture" is in reference to writings mentioned or cited within the present Biblical record, but which are not in the Bible itself. Some of these writings are known from other sources, and some are not.
Lost writing | Biblical citation to the lost writing |
---|---|
Book of the Wars of the Lord | Numbers 21꞉14 |
Book of Jasher | Joshua 10꞉13, 2 Samuel 1꞉18 |
Book of the Acts of Solomon | 1 Kings 11꞉41 |
Book of Samuel the Seer | 1 Chronicles 29꞉29 |
Book of Gad the Seer | 1 Chronicles 29꞉29 |
Book of Nathan the Prophet | 1 Chronicles 29꞉29, 2 Chronicles 9꞉29 |
Prophecy of of Ahijah | 2 Chronicles 9꞉29 |
Visions of Iddo the Seer | 2 Chronicles 9꞉29, 2 Chronicles 12꞉15, 2 Chronicles 13꞉22 |
Book of Shemaiah | 2 Chronicles 12꞉15 |
Book of Jehu | 2 Chronicles 20꞉34 |
Sayings of the Seers | 2 Chronicles 33꞉19 |
lament for Josiah | 2 Chronicles 35꞉25 |
Paul's epistle to Corinthians before our "1 Corinthians" | 1 Corinthians 5꞉9 |
Paul's possible earlier Ephesians epistle | Ephesians 3꞉3 |
Paul's epistle to Church at Laodicea | Colossians 4꞉16 |
1 Enoch 1:19 and The Assumption of Moses | Jude 1꞉14-15 |
1 Enoch | "It influenced Matthew, Luke, John, Acts, Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Ephesians, Colossians, 1 and 2 Thessalonians, 1 Timothy, Hebrews, 1 John, Jude (which quotes it directly) and Revelation (with numerous points of contact)…in molding New Testament doctrines concerning the nature of the Messiah, the Son of Man, the messianic kingdom, demonology, the future, resurrection, the final judgment, the whole eschatological theater, and symbolism."[1] |
The picture is further complicated by the fact that Christians have not always agreed on the "canon"—that is, they have not always agreed upon which writings were "scripture" and which were not.
Some examples of these variations:
Christian Person or Group | Difference in canon from Protestant Bible (eg KJV) |
---|---|
Catholics | Apocrypha is canonical |
Orthodox | Apocrypha is canonical |
Clement of Alexanderia (A.D. 200) | Included in canon:
|
Roman Christians (circa A.D. 200) | Included in canon:
Excluded from canon:
|
Origen (date) | Included in canon:
Excluded from canon:
|
Syriac Peshitta | Excluded from the canon:
|
Armenian Church | Included in canon:
Excluded from canon:
|
Ethiopian Church | Included in canon:
|
Martin Luther | Considered Epistle of James "a right strawy epistle."[9] Also didn't agree with Sermon on the Mount because didn't match his "grace only" theology. |
All these canons cannot be correct. Why must we accept that the critic's Bible is complete and inerrant? By what authority is this declared? Such an authority would have to be outside the Bible, thus demonstrating that there is some other source for the Word of God besides the Bible.
Furthermore, one should remember that Biblical writers were not aware of the Bible canon, because the Bible was not compiled until centuries later. Thus, Biblical writers cannot have referred to completeness and sufficiency of the canon, because the canon did not exist.
1. Biblical writers considered writings not in the present canon to be scriptural writings.
2. Christian groups do not agree on what constitutes the Biblical canon—any claim that the canon is closed, complete, and sufficient must answer:
3. Differences in canon between Christian groups and Biblical authors' clear belief in the scriptural status of other non-Biblical texts argue against a coherent doctrine of Biblical sufficiency and inerrancy drawn from the Bible itself. Such a claim must come from without the Bible.
FAIR Holy Bible materials |
On-line Holy Bible materials |
Holy Bible print materials |
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now