Array

Question: Does the mistaken "discovery" of cold fusion by Pons and Fleishman in Utah reflect on Mormon gullibility, inability to do science, or dishonesty?: Difference between revisions

(mod)
Line 19: Line 19:
''None''
''None''


=={{Further reading label}}==
{{FurtherReading}}


==={{FAIR wiki articles label}}===
{{ScienceWiki}}
==={{FAIR web site label}}===
''None''
==={{External links label}}===
* {{FR-6-2-3}} {{an|Discusses Brooke's attempt to use "cold fusion" to tell us something about LDS thought or beliefs.}}
==={{Printed material label}}===
''None''
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}


[[fr:Mormonism and science/Alleged "discovery" of cold fusion by Utah researchers]]
[[fr:Mormonism and science/Alleged "discovery" of cold fusion by Utah researchers]]

Revision as of 21:19, 24 March 2012

Answers portal
Creation
    RESOURCES
Adam and Eve:
Creation:
Evolution:
    PERSPECTIVES
    MEDIA
    OTHER PORTALS

This page is based on an answer to a question submitted to the FAIR web site, or a frequently asked question.

==

Questions

== Critics claim that the mistaken "discovery" of cold fusion in Utah reflects on either LDS gullibility, inability to do science, or dishonesty.

To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, [[../CriticalSources|click here]]

==

Detailed Analysis

==

The so-called "cold fusion" was reported by Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischman at the University of Utah on 23 March 1988. Neither Pons or Fleishman is LDS, and the University of Utah is not controlled or owned by the Church.

This is often an attempt to poison the well via guilt by association.

In this case, however, the charge is absurd, since neither researcher or their institution had anything to do with "Mormonism."

== Notes == None


Further reading and additional sources responding to these claims