
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
m (robot Adding: fr:Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Reformed Egyptian/Egyptian too bulky) |
GregSmithBot (talk | contribs) m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-Source(s) of the criticism +{{Criticism source label English}}, -Source(s) of the Criticism +{{Criticism source label English}}, -==Criticism== +=={{Criticism label}}==, -==Response== +=={{Response label}}==, -==Qu) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{draft}} | {{draft}} | ||
{{BoMPortal}} | {{BoMPortal}} | ||
==Criticism== | =={{Criticism label}}== | ||
Critics claim that Egyptian would be too lengthy and bulky on the plates to account for the Book of Mormon: | Critics claim that Egyptian would be too lengthy and bulky on the plates to account for the Book of Mormon: | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{CriticalSources}} | {{CriticalSources}} | ||
==Response== | =={{Response label}}== | ||
Unfortunately for the critics, knowledge of Egyptian was in its infancy. Critics of the era knew little about Egyptian, because ''no one'' knew very much. The critics were probably thinking of Egyptian hieroglyphics. However, the Book of Mormon makes it clear that reformed Egyptian had been adapted by them for concise writing. As discussed in the [[Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Reformed Egyptian|main article]], variant Old World forms of Egyptian (such as Demotic) were quite compact, and well-suited for writing with space constraints. | Unfortunately for the critics, knowledge of Egyptian was in its infancy. Critics of the era knew little about Egyptian, because ''no one'' knew very much. The critics were probably thinking of Egyptian hieroglyphics. However, the Book of Mormon makes it clear that reformed Egyptian had been adapted by them for concise writing. As discussed in the [[Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Reformed Egyptian|main article]], variant Old World forms of Egyptian (such as Demotic) were quite compact, and well-suited for writing with space constraints. | ||
==Conclusion== | =={{Conclusion label}}== | ||
One hears little of this critique today; linguistic "fact" has caught up with the Book of Mormon, the critics have largely abandoned this approach. | One hears little of this critique today; linguistic "fact" has caught up with the Book of Mormon, the critics have largely abandoned this approach. | ||
==Endnotes== | =={{Endnotes label}}== | ||
#{{note|critic.1}} {{CriticalWork:A Little Talk:1840|pages=1–8}} | #{{note|critic.1}} {{CriticalWork:A Little Talk:1840|pages=1–8}} | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
#{{JBMS-5-2-7}} <!-- Tvetdnes --> | #{{JBMS-5-2-7}} <!-- Tvetdnes --> | ||
==Further reading== | =={{Further reading label}}== | ||
===FAIR wiki articles=== | ==={{FAIR wiki articles label}}=== | ||
{{Book of Mormon anachronisms}} | {{Book of Mormon anachronisms}} | ||
===FAIR web site=== | ==={{FAIR web site label}}=== | ||
*{{tg|url=http://www.fairlds.org/apol/ai091.html|topic=Reformed Egyptian}} | *{{tg|url=http://www.fairlds.org/apol/ai091.html|topic=Reformed Egyptian}} | ||
===External links=== | ==={{External links label}}=== | ||
===Printed material=== | ==={{Printed material label}}=== | ||
*Carl H. Jones, "The 'Anthon Transcript' and Two Mesoamerican Cylinder Seals," ''Newsletter and Proceedings of the Society for Early Historical Archaeology'' 122 (September 1970): 1–8. | *Carl H. Jones, "The 'Anthon Transcript' and Two Mesoamerican Cylinder Seals," ''Newsletter and Proceedings of the Society for Early Historical Archaeology'' 122 (September 1970): 1–8. | ||
*{{Nibley7_1|start=149}}{{GL1|url=http://gospelink.com/library/doc?doc_id=274530}} | *{{Nibley7_1|start=149}}{{GL1|url=http://gospelink.com/library/doc?doc_id=274530}} |
This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.
Answers portal |
Book of Mormon |
![]() |
![]() |
---|
General information: Book of Mormon & Bible: Criticisms: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
==
== Critics claim that Egyptian would be too lengthy and bulky on the plates to account for the Book of Mormon:
To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, click here
==
== Unfortunately for the critics, knowledge of Egyptian was in its infancy. Critics of the era knew little about Egyptian, because no one knew very much. The critics were probably thinking of Egyptian hieroglyphics. However, the Book of Mormon makes it clear that reformed Egyptian had been adapted by them for concise writing. As discussed in the main article, variant Old World forms of Egyptian (such as Demotic) were quite compact, and well-suited for writing with space constraints.
==
==
One hears little of this critique today; linguistic "fact" has caught up with the Book of Mormon, the critics have largely abandoned this approach.
== Notes ==
The best article(s) to read next on this topic is/are:
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now