Array

Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Mormonism 101/Chapter 5: Difference between revisions

Line 17: Line 17:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


This claim, however, directly contradicts {{s||Alma|42|2}}:
This claim, however, directly contradicts {{s||Alma|42|12}}:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
And now, there was no means to reclaim men from this fallen state, which man had brought upon himself because of his own disobedience.
And now, there was no means to reclaim men from this fallen state, which man had brought upon himself because of his own disobedience.

Revision as of 01:59, 30 October 2009


A work by author: Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson

A review of Chapter: "The Fall"

The authors claim,

Contrary to the LDS concept of the fall, the Bible shows that this event was the result of disobeying God. [1]

This claim, however, directly contradicts Alma 42꞉12:

And now, there was no means to reclaim men from this fallen state, which man had brought upon himself because of his own disobedience.

Endnotes

  1. [note]  Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson, Mormonism 101 (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 2001), 74.