Array

Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Mormonism 101/Chapter 5: Difference between revisions

(add)
Line 15: Line 15:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
Contrary to the LDS concept of the fall, the Bible shows that this event was the result of disobeying God. {{ref|mckeever.74}}
Contrary to the LDS concept of the fall, the Bible shows that this event was the result of disobeying God. {{ref|mckeever.74}}
</blockquote>
This claim, however, directly contradicts {{s||Alma|42|2}}:
<blockquote>
And now, there was no means to reclaim men from this fallen state, which man had brought upon himself because of his own disobedience.
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


==Endnotes==
==Endnotes==
#{{note|mckeever.74}} Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson, Mormonism 101 (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 2001), 74.
#{{note|mckeever.74}} Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson, Mormonism 101 (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 2001), 74.

Revision as of 01:58, 30 October 2009


A work by author: Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson

A review of Chapter: "The Fall"

The authors claim,

Contrary to the LDS concept of the fall, the Bible shows that this event was the result of disobeying God. [1]

This claim, however, directly contradicts Alma 42꞉2:

And now, there was no means to reclaim men from this fallen state, which man had brought upon himself because of his own disobedience.

Endnotes

  1. [note]  Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson, Mormonism 101 (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 2001), 74.