Criticism of Mormonism/Books/One Nation Under Gods/Chapter 16

Claims made in "Chapter 15: Making the Transition"

A FAIR Analysis of: Criticism of Mormonism/Books A work by author: Richard Abanes

Claims made in "Chapter 17: Is Mormonism Christian?"

Claims made in "Chapter 16: Mormon Racism: Black Is Not Beautiful"

Page	Claim	Response	Author's sources
355 epigraph, 597n1	Joseph Smith said in History of the Church: "Had I anything to do with the negro, I would confine them by strict law to their own species..."	Notable omissions: Joseph Smith and confining the negro	History of the Church, vol. 5, 217-218.
356, 597n5	Author's quote: "Mormonism and racism have for many years been synonymous terms to persons well acquainted with Latter-day Saint beliefs."	The author's hostility and many errors on this and many other points of LDS belief demonstrate that he, at least, is not one of these persons so acquainted. ONUG's double standard on race issues Loaded and prejudicial language	Thelma Geer, Mormonism, Mama & Me, 24-25. This source is an anti-Mormon work published by Thelma "Granny" Geer (second edition in 1980; expanded 4th edition by 1984; 5th edition 1986). Ms. Geer's book cover announces that she has appeared in two films, The Cult Explosion and The God Makers. It is not clear why Abanes, who clearly has pretensions to writing a 'scholarly' work, would use this type of polemic as a secondary source. Anti-Mormon literature is nothing if not self-referential. Richard N. and Joan K. Ostling, Mormon America: The Power and the Promise, (New York:HarperCollins Publishers, 2000), 103-106. ( Index of claims ) Thomas Matthews, "Mormon Racism In Perspective."
356	Did the granting of the priesthood to blacks in 1978 fail to "eradicate the previous 148 years of Mormon racist/white supremacist teachings?" Were these teaching all related to the LDS doctrine of pre-existence?	Internal contradiction: p. 370 tells us that 'Mormons, by and large, were pleased that God had changed his mind at such a convenient time in history.' So, why were the Mormons happy about the revelation if their supposedly racist mindset could hardly be eradicated by the 1978 revelation? And , the evidence shows that Mormons are no more or no less racist than others of the same background.[citation needed] ONUG's double standard on race issues Loaded and prejudicial language	Author's statement.
356, n6	Do Latter-day Saints believe that everyone's place in the world was determined by how they behaved in the pre-mortal world?	Note that the word traditional. Such teachings have been repudiated. Revelation has clarified false or incomplete former beliefs. The author presumes the Saints believe in prophetic infallibility. They do not.  Misrepresentation of source: Abraham 3꞉22 only says that God chose 'noble and great' spirits to be his spiritual leaders in the pre-mortal world. It says nothing about country, socio-economic status, etc.	Pearl of Great Price, Book of Abraham 3:22.
357, 597n7, 9-11	Author's quote: These admirable spirits served God well, followed his commands, and did the most with their talents before coming to earth. Consequently, they are rewarded by being born into favorable circumstances. To be specific, they are born as Mormons in America, or at the very least, somewhere in a predominantly Caucasian country. More righteous spirits are born with more advantages. Less commendable spirits, however, are born with fewer advantages, into lives of greater or lesser quality depending on how poorly they performed in the pre-earth world. Moreover, they are born as non-whites. This is their punishment for not having been all they could have been during the pre-existence. A quote from Apostle Mark E. Petersen is provided to support this assertion.	Such teachings have been repudiated. Revelation has clarified false or incomplete former beliefs. The author presumes the Saints believe in prophetic infallibility. They do not. Racist statements by Church leaders ONUG's double standard on race issues	Mark E. Petersen, "Race Problems As They Affect The Church," Address At the Convention of Teachers of Religion On the College Level, delivered at Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, August 27, 1954. John J. Stewart, The Glory of Mormonism, inside flap book cover and 144. Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, vol. 1, 61.
357, 597n8	Does Latter-day Saint doctrine teach that black is not an "honourable body?"	Such teachings have been repudiated. Revelation has clarified false or incomplete former beliefs. Racist statements by Church leaders ONUG's double standard on race issues	Orson Hyde, Speech of Orson Hyde, Delivered Before the High Priests' Quorum, in Nauvoo, April 27th, 1845, Upon the Course and Conduct of Mr. Sidney Rigdon, 309.
358, 597n13	Were those who "fought on Christ's side" in the pre-existence born as "privileged Mormon whites?" Were those who were "less valiant" born as blacks?	Misrepresentation of source: Use of sources:Mormon Doctrine on race issues The author fails to here inform us that Elder McConkie retracted previous ideas which he and others had expressed about blacks and the priesthood. McConkie is quoted without qualification. [ATTENTION!] Such teachings have been repudiated. Revelation has clarified false or incomplete former beliefs. The author presumes the Saints believe in prophetic infallibility. They do not. ONUG's double standard on race issues	B.H. Roberts, "To the Youth of Israel," The Contributor, vol. 6, 296-297. Bruce McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, p. 527.
358, 597n14-15	Didn't Brigham Young and Bruce R. McConkie claim that blacks were of the lineage of Cain?	Blacks and the priesthood/The "curse of Cain" and "curse of Ham" ONUG's double standard on race issues	McConkie, Mormon Doctrine p. 109. Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses 7:290.
360, 598n23-26	Did Bruce R. McConkie say in his 1966 edition of Mormon Doctrine: "The negroes are not equal with other races where the receipt of certain spiritual blessings are concerned...[B]ut this inequality is not of man's origin. It is the Lord's doing." *Did Joseph Fielding Smith make a similar statement?	Misrepresentation of source: Use of sources:Mormon Doctrine on race issues The author fails to here inform us that Elder McConkie retracted previous ideas which he and others had expressed about blacks and the priesthood. McConkie is quoted without qualification.	McConkie, 527. Joseph Fielding Smith, mimeographed letter, July 9, 1963. Quoted in Stewart, The Glory of Mormonism, 154. Lowery Nelson, letter to First Presidency, October 8, 1947. Quoted in Steward, 146. LDS First Presidency, letter to Lowery Nelson, July 17, 1947. Quoted in Steward, 153.
361, 598n27	"Fourth generation Mormon" Thelma Geer said: "As a white Mormon, I proudly accepted the teaching that my fair skin and Mormon parentage signified that I had been one of God's most intelligent and obedient born-in-heaven spirit children....As a reward for my superior attributes and attitudes, I had been singled out, trained, and qualified to be born a white Latter-day Saint, deserving of emulation, adulation, and eventual deification. All dark-skinned people, even darker-complexioned Caucasians...had been inferior spirits in heaven."	Thelma Geer appeared in the film The God Makers. She and the author do not disclose that these are 'folk beliefs.' Such teachings have been repudiated. Revelation has clarified false or incomplete former beliefs. The author presumes the Saints believe in prophetic infallibility. They do not. This was true even when Geer wrote in 1980.	Geer, Mormonism, Mama & Me, 24-25. The author cites Geer yet again. This source is an anti-Mormon work published by Thelma "Granny" Geer (second edition in 1980; expanded 4th edition by 1984; 5th edition 1986). Ms. Geer's book cover announces that she has appeared in two films, The Cult Explosion and The God Makers. It is not clear why Abanes, who clearly has pretensions to writing a 'scholarly' work, would use this type of polemic as a secondary source. Anti-Mormon literature is nothing if not self-referential.
361, 598n28, 31	Was interracial marriage condemned by Brigham Young as "one of the most heinous of deeds?"	History unclear or in error: interracial marriage was illegal in Brigham Young's day. The relationships which he was discussing were not marriages, and he condemned the white person for exploiting the black.  Misrepresentation of source: Brigham Young on race mixing Inter-racial marriage a sin? ONUG's double standard on race issues	Juvenile Instructor, vol. 3, 165. Quoted in Jerald and Sandra Tanner, Mormonism—Shadow or Reality?, 5th edition, (Salt Lake City: Utah Lighthouse Ministry, 1987), 266.. Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses 10:110.
362, 598n29-30	Did Mark E. Petersen say that segregation was acceptable, and the interracial marriage "posed a danger?"	Such teachings have been repudiated. Revelation has clarified false or incomplete former beliefs. The author presumes the Saints believe in prophetic infallibility. They do not. Inter-racial marriage a sin? Racist statements by Church leaders ONUG's double standard on race issues	Petersen, "Race Problems As They Affect The Church."
364, 599n40	Did Latter-day Saints not support the Civil Rights movement because they had "strong feelings of racial superiority infused into them by years of white supremacist teachings," as claimed by Wallace Turner?	Latter-day Saints were of more than one opinion about the Civil Rights movement. Even the leadership did not all agree; some supported the movement, and others worried that it was a front for interests hostile to American liberties. Unlike many Protestant denominations, however, Latter-day Saints did not have segregated congregations, or address racist groups like the Klu Klux Klan. ONUG's double standard on race issues	Wallace Turner, The Mormon Establishment, 229
365, 599n44	Did LDS leaders instruct a missionary to "not to work with the poor and to tell blacks that they should attend the church of their choice, but not the Mormon church?"	ONUG's double standard on race issues	Robert Gottlieb and Peter Wiley, American Saints: The Rise of Mormon Power, 179-180.
366	Was David O. McKay was "blocked" from granting Blacks the priesthood by Ezra Taft Benson, Harold B. Lee, and Joseph Fielding Smith?	History unclear or in error: David O. McKay's recent biography includes the following accounts about the priesthood ban: "McKay said, 'I have prayed and prayed and prayed, but there has been no answer.'" "...he had inquired of the Lord several times on the matter, and ... the answer was, 'Not yet.'" "I've inquired of the Lord repeatedly. The last time I did it was late last night. I was told, with no discussion, not to bring the subject up with the Lord again; that the time will come, but it will not be my time, and to leave the subject alone."[1] ONUG's double standard on race issues	No citations specific to this claim. The following citations talk about Benson and the John Birch Society and his "racist/anti-Communist views."
367	When George Wallace asked President David O. McKay if Ezra Taft Benson could be his vice-presidential running mate, this request was denied. Did this, as the author asserts, "illustrate the serious in-fighting and strained relations between Benson and his supporters on one side, and more moderate high-ranking LDS authorities on McKay's side?"	ONUG's double standard on race issues	No citation provided.
368	By the time Spencer W. Kimball took over as Church president "the church had been enduring non-stop pressure to conform with America's realization that racial inequality had to end."	History unclear or in error: Social pressure on priesthood issue? ONUG's double standard on race issues	No citation provided.
369, 599n57	Was President Kimball forced to change the priesthood restriction because of the new temple in Brazil?	ONUG's double standard on race issues	Gottlieb and Wiley, 184,.
370, n58	Author's quote: "Like the Manifesto, the 1978 policy change was billed as a 'revelation' from God"	Loaded and prejudicial language	Declaration 2, released to Deseret News, June 9, 1978, page 1A.
370	Author's quote: "Mormons, by and large, were pleased that God had changed his mind at such a convenient time in history."	Internal contradiction: On p. 356, we are told the 1978 revelation "could hardly eradicate the previous 148 years of Mormon racist/white supremacist teachings." See also p. 353 where LDS beliefs are called "white supremacist." So, why were most Mormons "pleased" if they were still suffering from the burden of racist attitudes and white supremacist beliefs? Why would racists be happy about the change?  History unclear or in error: Social pressure on priesthood issue? Sarcasm	No source provided.
370	Did the end of the priesthood restriction allow missionary work to proceed in the Caribbean, Central America, and Haiti?	[ATTENTION!]Was there no missionary work going on in these locations prior to 1978?	No source provided.
370	Did the lifting of the priesthood ban cause "millions of dollars" to begin "flowing into the church's coffers?"	Absurd claims	No source provided.
370, 599n59	Didn't Brigham Young say that Blacks would not receive the priesthood until after the resurrection of the dead?	The author presumes that Latter-day Saints believe in prophetic infallibility. They do not.	Brigham Young, [ Journal of Discourses 2:143]. Brigham Young, [ Journal of Discourses 7:290-291].
371, 600n63	Is the idea that the words of a living prophet are more important than the teachings of a dead prophet a "illogical belief?"	This is what the early Christians thought too—Jesus and the apostles superseded dead prophets like Moses. Loaded and prejudicial language Sarcasm	John Lewis Lund, The Church and the Negro: A Discussion of Mormons, Negroes, and the Priesthood, 45.
372	The book claims that following question has not been adequately answered: "If God has removed the curse that at one time kept Blacks from the priesthood, then why has he not removed the marks of that curse..."	The author's claim is false: The answer is clear and has been answered by LDS apostles.	No source provided. The author does not demonstrate that he has even assessed LDS answers, much less demonstrated why they have not been "adequately answered." On what grounds does the author get to decide what is an "adequate" answer? His unremitting hostility to the Saints and the Church is clear—no answer is likely to satisfy him.
372	The book claims that following question has not been adequately answered: "If some spirits continue to be cursed with black skin because of their unrighteous behavior in the pre-mortal world, then why does that same unrighteous behavior now no longer disqualify them from the priesthood?"	The author's claim is false: The answer is clear and has been answered by LDS apostles.	No source provided. The author does not demonstrate that he has even assessed LDS answers, much less demonstrated why they have not been "adequately answered." On what grounds does the author get to decide what is an "adequate" answer? His unremitting hostility to the Saints and the Church is clear—no answer is likely to satisfy him.
372	The book claims that following question has not been adequately answered: "If black skin is no longer a sign of a special curse, then does that mean white skin is no longer a sign of a special blessing?"	The author's claim is false: The answer is clear and has been answered by LDS apostles.	No source provided. The author does not demonstrate that he has even assessed LDS answers, much less demonstrated why they have not been "adequately answered." On what grounds does the author get to decide what is an "adequate" answer? His unremitting hostility to the Saints and the Church is clear—no answer is likely to satisfy him.
372	The book claims that following question has not been adequately answered: "If a racially mixed couple conceived a child before June 9, 1978, and in so doing sinned by mixing a cursed seed (Black) with an un-cursed seed (White), then after June 9, 1978, were they still guilty of the sin of race-mixing since Blacks were no longer cursed from the priesthood?"	The author's claim is false: The answer is clear and has been answered by LDS apostles.  Misrepresentation of source: Brigham_Young_on_race_mixing, as mention in the entry on p. 361, Brigham Young's remarks were not made in a context of 'marriage,' but in one of sexual exploitation. Inter-racial marriage a sin?	No source provided. The author does not demonstrate that he has even assessed LDS answers, much less demonstrated why they have not been "adequately answered." On what grounds does the author get to decide what is an "adequate" answer? His unremitting hostility to the Saints and the Church is clear—no answer is likely to satisfy him.

Further reading

Template code	Inserts this reference	Click to edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: 8: The Mormon Proposition}}	To learn more box:responses to: 8: The Mormon Proposition	edit
{{To learn more box:''Under the Banner of Heaven''}}	To learn more about responses to: Under the Banner of Heaven	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Robert Price}}	To learn more about responses to: Robert Price	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Ankerberg and Weldon}}	To learn more about responses to: Ankerberg and Weldon	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Ashamed of Joseph}}	To learn more about responses to: Ashamed of Joseph	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Beckwith and Moser}}	To learn more about responses to: Beckwith and Moser	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Beckwith and Parrish}}	To learn more about responses to: Beckwith and Parrish	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Benjamin Park}}	To learn more about responses to: Benjamin Park	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Bible versus Joseph Smith}}	To learn more about responses to: Bible versus Joseph Smith	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Bible versus Book of Mormon}}	To learn more about responses to: Bible versus Book of Mormon	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: ''Big Love''}}	To learn more about responses to: Big Love	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Brett Metcalfe}}	To learn more about responses to: Brett Metcalfe	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Bill Maher}}	To learn more about responses to: Bill Maher	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Bruce H. Porter}}	To learn more about responses to: Bruce H. Porter	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Carol Wang Shutter}}	To learn more about responses to: Carol Wang Shutter	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: CES Letter}}	To learn more about responses to: CES Letter	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Charles Larson}}	To learn more about responses to: Charles Larson	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Christopher Nemelka}}	To learn more about responses to: Christopher Nemelka	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Colby Townshed}}	To learn more about responses to: Colby Townshed	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Contender Ministries}}	To learn more about responses to: Contender Ministries	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Crane and Crane}}	To learn more about responses to: Crane and Crane	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: D. Michael Quinn}}	To learn more about responses to: D. Michael Quinn	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Dan Vogel}}	To learn more about responses to: Dan Vogel	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: David John Buerger}}	To learn more about responses to: David John Buerger	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: David Persuitte}}	To learn more about responses to: David Persuitte	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Denver Snuffer}}	To learn more about responses to: Denver Snuffer	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Dick Bauer}}	To learn more about responses to: Dick Bauer	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Duwayne R Anderson}}	To learn more about responses to: Duwayne R Anderson	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Earl Wunderli}}	To learn more about responses to: Earl Wunderli	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Ed Decker}}	To learn more about responses to: Ed Decker	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Erikson and Giesler}}	To learn more about responses to: Erikson and Giesler	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Ernest Taves}}	To learn more about responses to: Ernest Taves	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Fawn Brodie}}	To learn more about responses to: Fawn Brodie	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: George D Smith}}	To learn more about responses to: George D Smith	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Grant Palmer}}	To learn more about responses to: Grant Palmer	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Hank Hanegraaff}}	To learn more about responses to: Hank Hanegraaff	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Hurlbut-Howe}}	To learn more about responses to: Hurlbut-Howe	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: James Brooke}}	To learn more about responses to: James Brooke	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: James Spencer}}	To learn more about responses to: James Spencer	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: James White}}	To learn more about responses to: James White	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Jerald and Sandra Tanner}}	To learn more about responses to: Jerald and Sandra Tanner	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Jesus Christ-Joseph Smith or Search for the Truth DVD}}	To learn more about responses to: Jesus Christ-Joseph Smith or Search for the Truth DVD	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: John Dehlin}}	To learn more about responses to: John Dehlin	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Jonathan Neville}}	To learn more about responses to: Jonathan Neville	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Kurt Van Gorden}}	To learn more about responses to: Kurt Van Gorden	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Laura King Newell and Valeen Tippetts Avery}}	To learn more about responses to: Laura King Newell and Valeen Tippetts Avery	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Loftes Tryk aka Lofte Payne}}	To learn more about responses to: Loftes Tryk aka Lofte Payne	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Luke WIlson}}	To learn more about responses to: Luke WIlson	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Marquardt and Walters}}	To learn more about responses to: Marquardt and Walters	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Martha Beck}}	To learn more about responses to: Martha Beck	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Mcgregor Ministries}}	To learn more about responses to: Mcgregor Ministries	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: McKeever and Johnson}}	To learn more about responses to: McKeever and Johnson	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: New Approaches}}	To learn more about responses to: New Approaches to the Book of Mormon	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Richard Abanes}}	To learn more about responses to: Richard Abanes	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Richard Van Wagoner}}	To learn more about responses to: Richard Van Wagoner	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Richard and Joan Ostling}}	To learn more about responses to: Richard and Joan Ostling	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Rick Grunger}}	To learn more about responses to: Rick Grunger	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Robert Ritner}}	To learn more about responses to: Robert Ritner	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Rod Meldrum}}	To learn more about responses to: Rod Meldrum	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Roger I Anderson}}	To learn more about responses to: Roger I Anderson	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Ronald V. Huggins}}	To learn more about responses to: Ronald V. Huggins	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Sally Denton}}	To learn more about responses to: Sally Denton	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Simon Southerton}}	To learn more about responses to: Simon Southerton	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Thomas Murphy}}	To learn more about responses to: Thomas Murphy	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Todd Compton}}	To learn more about responses to: Todd Compton	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Vernal Holley}}	To learn more about responses to: Vernal Holley	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Walter Martin}}	To learn more about responses to: Walter Martin	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Wesley Walters}}	To learn more about responses to: Wesley Walters	edit
{{To learn more box:responses to: Will Bagley}}	To learn more about responses to: Will Bagley	edit