
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
m (→225-226) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
*[[Nauvoo city charter/Usurpation of power]] | *[[Nauvoo city charter/Usurpation of power]] | ||
|| | || | ||
The author cites chapter 2 of the present work. However, no argument or justification for this claim is provided in the previous chapter either. | |||
{{CriticalWorks:Smith:Nauvoo_Polygamy:See_also:Nauvoo city charter}} | {{CriticalWorks:Smith:Nauvoo_Polygamy:See_also:Nauvoo city charter}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
||It is interesting that [The Peace Maker, a non-member's defence of polygamy] appeared during the hiatus in the erstwhile marriage frenzy of 1842 and while Smith's apostles were traveling the countryside to counter Bennett's words and deny polygamy." | ||It is interesting that [The Peace Maker, a non-member's defence of polygamy] appeared during the hiatus in the erstwhile marriage frenzy of 1842 and while Smith's apostles were traveling the countryside to counter Bennett's words and deny polygamy." | ||
|| | || | ||
* | *The author does not discuss the many differences between The Peace Maker and LDS doctrine. | ||
* | *The author and his source also ignore the arguments which had been raised against Joseph's participation or approval. | ||
*[[Polygamy Book/The Peace Maker]] | *[[Polygamy Book/The Peace Maker]] | ||
|| | || | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
||"…the entire Mormon community would be expelled from Illinois, primarily because of the dominant sense they betrayed public trust." | ||"…the entire Mormon community would be expelled from Illinois, primarily because of the dominant sense they betrayed public trust." | ||
|| | || | ||
* | *The author here over-simplifies an extremely complex issue, with no references or argument. | ||
See: Kenneth W. Godfrey, "Causes of Mormon Non-Mormon Conflict in Hancock County, Illinois, 1839-1846," Ph.D. thesis (1967), Brigham Young University. | See: Kenneth W. Godfrey, "Causes of Mormon Non-Mormon Conflict in Hancock County, Illinois, 1839-1846," Ph.D. thesis (1967), Brigham Young University. | ||
|| | || | ||
Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
||Helen's biographer concludes that she 'expected her marriage to Joseph Smith' to be a ceremony 'for eternity only,' not an actual marriage involving physical relations. | ||Helen's biographer concludes that she 'expected her marriage to Joseph Smith' to be a ceremony 'for eternity only,' not an actual marriage involving physical relations. | ||
|| | || | ||
*There is no evidence for physical relations in Sarah's marriage to Joseph. The source cited, Compton, does not agree with | *There is no evidence for physical relations in Sarah's marriage to Joseph. The source cited, Compton, does not agree with The author's reading: “there is absolutely no evidence that there was any sexuality in the marriage, and I suggest that, following later practice in Utah, there may have been no sexuality. All the evidence points to this marriage as a primarily dynastic marriage.”{{ref|compton1}} | ||
*{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}} | *{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}} | ||
*[[Joseph Smith and polygamy/Helen Mar Kimball]] | *[[Joseph Smith and polygamy/Helen Mar Kimball]] | ||
Line 169: | Line 169: | ||
||"As she put her ambivalent feelings into verse in her "Reminiscences," Helen had "thought through this life my time will be my own," but "the step I am now taking's for eternity alone." She saw her "youthful friends grow shy and cold" as "poisonous darts from sland'rous tongues were hurled." She was "bar'd out from social scenes by this destiny," and faced "sad'nd mem'ries of sweet departed joys" | ||"As she put her ambivalent feelings into verse in her "Reminiscences," Helen had "thought through this life my time will be my own," but "the step I am now taking's for eternity alone." She saw her "youthful friends grow shy and cold" as "poisonous darts from sland'rous tongues were hurled." She was "bar'd out from social scenes by this destiny," and faced "sad'nd mem'ries of sweet departed joys" | ||
|| | || | ||
*This poem in fact demonstrates | *This poem in fact demonstrates The author's distortion. Her concern was indeed that she was "bar'd out from social scenes"—she could not date while married. This does not mean, however, that there were sexual relations, and The author's source agrees. | ||
*In addition to hiding Compton's conclusion, Smith does not tell us that his Kimball source likewise concluded that the marriage with Helen was “unconsummated.” | *In addition to hiding Compton's conclusion, Smith does not tell us that his Kimball source likewise concluded that the marriage with Helen was “unconsummated.” | ||
*[[Joseph Smith and polygamy/Helen Mar Kimball]] | *[[Joseph Smith and polygamy/Helen Mar Kimball]] | ||
Line 180: | Line 180: | ||
||"That [Rhoda Richards] was her husband Brigham's cousin was apparently secondary to the grander scheme of interlocking the hierarchy in marriage." | ||"That [Rhoda Richards] was her husband Brigham's cousin was apparently secondary to the grander scheme of interlocking the hierarchy in marriage." | ||
|| | || | ||
*Here | *Here The author again relies on presentism to provide a hostile interpretive lens. It was not unusual for first cousins to marry. Nineteen of the present-day states permit unrestricted marriage between first cousins, and most countries have no restrictions at all on marriage between cousins. In its exploitation of the presentist fallacy, G. D. Smith’s remark is utterly irrelevant in its historical context. | ||
*[[../../Presentism]] | *[[../../Presentism]] | ||
|| | || | ||
Line 208: | Line 208: | ||
| | | | ||
====225-226==== | ====225-226==== | ||
|| | ||The author intends Joseph to be seen as arrogant. He quotes a letter from Joseph to James Arlington Bennet: | ||
:“I combat the errors of ages; I meet the violence of mobs; I cope with illegal proceedings from executive authority; I cut the Gordian knot of powers, and I solve mathematical problems of universities, with truth . . . diamond truth; and God is my ‘right hand man.’” | :“I combat the errors of ages; I meet the violence of mobs; I cope with illegal proceedings from executive authority; I cut the Gordian knot of powers, and I solve mathematical problems of universities, with truth . . . diamond truth; and God is my ‘right hand man.’” | ||
The author then editorializes: | The author then editorializes: | ||
:“With such a self-image, it is not surprising that he also aspired to the highest office in the land: the presidency of the United States.” | :“With such a self-image, it is not surprising that he also aspired to the highest office in the land: the presidency of the United States.” | ||
|| | || | ||
* | *The author fails to tell us that Joseph's remarks are a tongue-in-cheek reply to Bennet's previous letter. | ||
*[[Joseph Smith's narcissism]] | *[[Joseph Smith's narcissism]] | ||
|| | || | ||
Line 221: | Line 221: | ||
====226==== | ====226==== | ||
|| | ||The author again quotes Joseph: "‘I am learned, and know more than all the world put together." | ||
|| | || | ||
* | *The author does not quote enough of Joseph's remarks to complete his thought. | ||
* | *The author also avoids quoting the better versions of this talk, from the ''Times and Seasons'', ''BYU Studies'', or even Signature Books. | ||
*[[Joseph Smith's narcissism]] | *[[Joseph Smith's narcissism]] | ||
{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}} | {{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}} | ||
Line 261: | Line 261: | ||
||"In 1841, Sarah Pratt firmly rebuffed Smith and remained monogamously committed to her missionary husband." | ||"In 1841, Sarah Pratt firmly rebuffed Smith and remained monogamously committed to her missionary husband." | ||
|| | || | ||
* | *The author here again follows Bennett completely uncritically. He tells us nothing about the multiple witnesses who testified to Sarah's adultery with Bennett. | ||
*[[Polygamy book/John C. Bennett|John C. Bennett]] | *[[Polygamy book/John C. Bennett|John C. Bennett]] | ||
|| | || | ||
Line 271: | Line 271: | ||
||"Cordelia C. Morley Cox….had rejected [Joseph's] amorous proposal." | ||"Cordelia C. Morley Cox….had rejected [Joseph's] amorous proposal." | ||
|| | || | ||
* | *The author again uses loaded language. There is little evidence that Joseph's proposals were romantic or amorous. | ||
*[[Joseph_Smith_and_polygamy/Did_women_turn_Joseph_down|Women who rejected plural marriage]] | *[[Joseph_Smith_and_polygamy/Did_women_turn_Joseph_down|Women who rejected plural marriage]] | ||
*[[../../Mind reading]] | *[[../../Mind reading]] | ||
Line 315: | Line 315: | ||
| | | | ||
====236a==== | ====236a==== | ||
|| | ||The author hints that Emma would have to sneak up on Joseph to check up on him, as evidenced by “his warning to Sarah Ann to proceed carefully in order to make sure Emma would not find them in their hiding place.” | ||
|| | || | ||
*Joseph’s hiding place from the mob and instructions to the Whitneys have been transmogrified into a hiding place for Joseph and Sarah Ann. | *Joseph’s hiding place from the mob and instructions to the Whitneys have been transmogrified into a hiding place for Joseph and Sarah Ann. |
Chapter 2 | A FAIR Analysis of: Criticism of Mormonism/Books A work by author: George D. Smith
|
Chapter 4 |
Page | Claim | Response | Author's sources | |
---|---|---|---|---|
159 |
"several days after Orson Pratt, Sidney Rigdon, and Ebenezer Robinson declined to affirm Smith's good character…." |
|
| |
160 |
Governor Carlin described that Nauvoo statute on writs as an "extraordinary assumption of power….most absurd and ridiculous…[a] gross usurpation of power that cannot be tolerated." |
|
Nauvoo city charter (edit) | |
161 |
"The Nauvoo charter, which was the basis for this presumption of independence from state jurisdiction…." |
|
The author cites chapter 2 of the present work. However, no argument or justification for this claim is provided in the previous chapter either. Nauvoo city charter (edit) | |
162 |
It is interesting that [The Peace Maker, a non-member's defence of polygamy] appeared during the hiatus in the erstwhile marriage frenzy of 1842 and while Smith's apostles were traveling the countryside to counter Bennett's words and deny polygamy." |
|
| |
163 |
"…the entire Mormon community would be expelled from Illinois, primarily because of the dominant sense they betrayed public trust." |
See: Kenneth W. Godfrey, "Causes of Mormon Non-Mormon Conflict in Hancock County, Illinois, 1839-1846," Ph.D. thesis (1967), Brigham Young University. |
| |
185 |
Joseph's "summer 1842 call for an intimate visit from Sarah Ann Whitney…substantiate[s] the intimate relationships he was involved in during those two years." |
|
Whitney "love letter" (edit) | |
185 |
"However, the History of the Church predictably gives no notice of these weddings." |
Censorship of Church History (edit) | ||
190 |
"The pretended marriage [of Joseph Kingsbury to the polygamously-married Sarah Ann Whitney] could have been a precaution against possible pregnancy." |
|
Whitney "love letter" (edit) | |
193 |
Lucy Walker "told Joseph she required a revelation before she would submit [to plural marriage]. He promised that if she prayed, she would receive her own personal manifestation from God, which she reported she received 'near dawn after—a sleepless night"—when a "heavenly influence" and feeling of "supreme happiness…took possession" of her." |
|
| |
196 |
Financial and marital issues, especially concerning the Lawrence sisters, would inflame public opinion prior to Smith's arrest. |
The author does not tell us that Madsen's work (which he cites for his claim) demonstrates that Joseph properly discharged all his financial duties as guardians of the Lawrence estate.
|
Gordon Madsen, ‘The Lawrence Estate Revisited: Joseph Smith and Illinois Law regarding Guardianships,’ Nauvoo Symposium, Sept. 21, 1989, Brigham Young University. | |
198 |
There was a "conflict of interests between building a church community and [Joseph's] continuing affection for young women." |
|
Ages of wives (edit) | |
198 |
"Joseph was pursuing Helen" Mar Kimball. |
| ||
201 |
Helen's biographer concludes that she 'expected her marriage to Joseph Smith' to be a ceremony 'for eternity only,' not an actual marriage involving physical relations. |
|
| |
201 |
"How surprised she was to discover 'that it included [marriage for] time also": a physical union at age fourteen with a thirty-seven year-old man." |
|
| |
201 |
"As she put her ambivalent feelings into verse in her "Reminiscences," Helen had "thought through this life my time will be my own," but "the step I am now taking's for eternity alone." She saw her "youthful friends grow shy and cold" as "poisonous darts from sland'rous tongues were hurled." She was "bar'd out from social scenes by this destiny," and faced "sad'nd mem'ries of sweet departed joys" |
|
| |
205 |
"That [Rhoda Richards] was her husband Brigham's cousin was apparently secondary to the grander scheme of interlocking the hierarchy in marriage." |
|
| |
214 |
"Even though Smith and Clayton spent three hours preparing the eloquent language" of D&C 132…. |
|
| |
217 |
"Smith found it useful to reference the conditional restriction on marriage found in the Book of Mormon." |
|
Joseph Smith: cynical motivations (edit)
| |
225-226 |
The author intends Joseph to be seen as arrogant. He quotes a letter from Joseph to James Arlington Bennet:
The author then editorializes:
|
|
| |
226 |
The author again quotes Joseph: "‘I am learned, and know more than all the world put together." |
Gregory L. Smith, A review of Nauvoo Polygamy:...but we called it celestial marriage by George D. Smith. FARMS Review, Vol. 20, Issue 2. (Detailed book review) |
| |
227 |
"There is no reason to doubt that Smith's marriages involved sexual relations in most instances." |
|
| |
227 |
"Mary Elizabeth Lightner spoke of 'three children' whom she said she 'knew he had.'" |
| ||
228-229 |
"Until decisive DNA testing of possible Smith descendants—daughters as well as sons—from plural wives can be accomplished, ascertaining whether Smith fathered children with any of his plural wives remains hypothetical." |
|
| |
230 |
"In 1841, Sarah Pratt firmly rebuffed Smith and remained monogamously committed to her missionary husband." |
|
| |
231 |
"Cordelia C. Morley Cox….had rejected [Joseph's] amorous proposal." |
|
| |
232 |
Eliza Winters “perhaps did not” resist Joseph’s advances “but apparently talked about it all the same.” |
|
Eliza Winters (edit)
| |
234 |
"According to LDS theology, the posthumous sealing meant that Heber would be Smith's son in the eternities, not the son of his biological father." |
|
Sealing takes away families? (edit) | |
235 |
[In 1831 Joseph] "directed missionaries to marry native American women." |
|
Early preoccupation with polygamy (edit) | |
236a |
The author hints that Emma would have to sneak up on Joseph to check up on him, as evidenced by “his warning to Sarah Ann to proceed carefully in order to make sure Emma would not find them in their hiding place.” |
|
Whitney "love letter" (edit) | |
236b |
G. D. Smith asks us to “assume . . . that LeRoi Snow’s account [about Emma and Eliza and the stairs] was accurate.” |
|
Emma, Eliza & stairs (edit)
| |
236c |
"Just as Joseph sought comfort from Sarah Ann the day Emma departed from his hideout…." |
|
Whitney "love letter" (edit) | |
237 |
Joseph's "insatiable addition of one woman after another to an invisible family…." |
|
Womanizing & romance (edit)
| |
237 |
Joseph had a "prolonged dalliance with Fanny Alger." |
Ignoring Hancock autobiography (edit)
Fanny Alger (edit)
Womanizing & romance (edit)
|
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now