FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Array
Fallibility of prophets: Difference between revisions
MikeParker (talk | contribs) (Rmv draft template) |
MikeParker (talk | contribs) m (Fix quote marks, m-dashes, spelling) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* | * | ||
--> | --> | ||
==Response== | ==Response== | ||
===Prophets in the LDS tradition are not | ===Prophets in the LDS tradition are not "infallible"=== | ||
The LDS do not believe that prophets and apostles are incapable of error, despite being called of God and receiving revelation. Joseph Smith himself taught that ‘a prophet was a prophet only when he was acting as such’.{{ref|js1}} The Church has always taught that its leaders are human and subject to failings as are all mortals. Only Jesus was perfect: | The LDS do not believe that prophets and apostles are incapable of error, despite being called of God and receiving revelation. Joseph Smith himself taught that ‘a prophet was a prophet only when he was acting as such’.{{ref|js1}} The Church has always taught that its leaders are human and subject to failings as are all mortals. Only Jesus was perfect: | ||
:The position is not assumed that the men of the New Dispensation —its prophets, apostles, presidencies, and other leaders—are without faults or infallible, rather they are treated as men of like passions with their fellow men."{{ref|clark1}} | :The position is not assumed that the men of the New Dispensation —its prophets, apostles, presidencies, and other leaders—are without faults or infallible, rather they are treated as men of like passions with their fellow men."{{ref|clark1}} | ||
===Standard of doctrine in Church=== | ===Standard of doctrine in Church=== | ||
President George Q. Cannon [1st | President George Q. Cannon [1st counselor to Brigham Young] explained that the scriptures are the only source of official doctrine, coupled with later revelation to the prophets that has been presented to the Church and sustained: | ||
:I hold in my hand the Book of Doctrine and Covenants, and also the book, The Pearl of Great Price, which books contain revelations of God. In Kirtland, the Doctrine and Covenants in its original form, as first printed, was submitted to the officers of the Church and the members of the Church to vote upon. As there have been additions made to it by the publishing of revelations which were not contained in the original edition, it has been deemed wise to submit these books with their contents to the conference, to see whether the conference will vote to accept the books and their contents as from God, and binding upon us as a people and as a Church.{{ref|cannon1}} | :I hold in my hand the Book of Doctrine and Covenants, and also the book, The Pearl of Great Price, which books contain revelations of God. In Kirtland, the Doctrine and Covenants in its original form, as first printed, was submitted to the officers of the Church and the members of the Church to vote upon. As there have been additions made to it by the publishing of revelations which were not contained in the original edition, it has been deemed wise to submit these books with their contents to the conference, to see whether the conference will vote to accept the books and their contents as from God, and binding upon us as a people and as a Church.{{ref|cannon1}} | ||
B.H. Roberts further explained that only those things within the Standard Works and those presented for a sustaining vote by the First Presidency and Council of the Twelve Apostles is binding upon the Church and its members: | |||
:The Church has confined the sources of doctrine by which it is willing to be bound before the world to the things that God has revealed, and which the Church has officially accepted, and those alone. These would include the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, the Pearl of Great Price; these have been repeatedly accepted and endorsed by the Church in general conference assembled, and are the only sources of absolute appeal for our doctrine.{{ref|roberts1}} | :The Church has confined the sources of doctrine by which it is willing to be bound before the world to the things that God has revealed, and which the Church has officially accepted, and those alone. These would include the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, the Pearl of Great Price; these have been repeatedly accepted and endorsed by the Church in general conference assembled, and are the only sources of absolute appeal for our doctrine.{{ref|roberts1}} | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Elsewhere, President Lee taught the same principle: | Elsewhere, President Lee taught the same principle: | ||
:It is not to be thought that every word spoken by the General Authorities is inspired, or that they are moved upon by the Holy Ghost in everything they speak and write. Now you keep that in mind. I don't care what his position is, if he writes something or speaks something that goes beyond anything that you can find in the standard works, unless that one be the prophet, seer, and revelator | :It is not to be thought that every word spoken by the General Authorities is inspired, or that they are moved upon by the Holy Ghost in everything they speak and write. Now you keep that in mind. I don't care what his position is, if he writes something or speaks something that goes beyond anything that you can find in the standard works, unless that one be the prophet, seer, and revelator—please note that one exception—you may immediately say, "Well, that is his own idea!" And if he says something that contradicts what is found in the standard works (I think that is why we call them "standard"—it is the standard measure of all that men teach), you may know by that same token that it is false; regardless of the position of the man who says it.{{ref|lee2}} | ||
===Prophets and new scripture=== | ===Prophets and new scripture=== | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Brigham here says that his remarks are "scripture." However, the critics rarely provide Brigham's ''own explanation'' of this comment: | Brigham here says that his remarks are "scripture." However, the critics rarely provide Brigham's ''own explanation'' of this comment: | ||
:Brother Orson Hyde referred to a few who complained about not getting revelations. I will make a statement here that has been brought against me as a crime, perhaps, or as a fault in my life. Not here, I do not allude to anything of the kind in this place, but in the councils of the nations | :Brother Orson Hyde referred to a few who complained about not getting revelations. I will make a statement here that has been brought against me as a crime, perhaps, or as a fault in my life. Not here, I do not allude to anything of the kind in this place, but in the councils of the nations—that Brigham Young has said "when he sends forth his discourses to the world they may call them Scripture." I say now, when they are copied and approved by me they are as good Scripture as is couched in this Bible, and if you want to read revelation read the sayings of him who knows the mind of God, without any special command to one man to go here, and to another to go yonder, or to do this or that, or to go and settle here or there.{{ref|by2}} | ||
Brigham Young made it clear that his previous statement should not mean that anything he said was scripture, but only that which he had the opportunity to correct and send to the Saints ''as'' scripture. This provides a good example of why this rule exists at all: what a prophet may intend to convey may not be what his listeners hear, or what scribes recorded. Thus, teachings must be approved by the author ''and'' submitted as binding scripture in order for them to be considered such. | Brigham Young made it clear that his previous statement should not mean that anything he said was scripture, but only that which he had the opportunity to correct and send to the Saints ''as'' scripture. This provides a good example of why this rule exists at all: what a prophet may intend to convey may not be what his listeners hear, or what scribes recorded. Thus, teachings must be approved by the author ''and'' submitted as binding scripture in order for them to be considered such. | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
===Establishing new doctrine=== | ===Establishing new doctrine=== | ||
:It is not sufficient to quote sayings purported to come from Joseph Smith or Brigham Young upon matters of doctrine. Our own people also need instruction and correction in respect of this. It is common to hear some of our older brethren say, ‘But I heard Brother Joseph myself say so,’ or ‘Brother Brigham preached it; I heard him.’ But that is not the question. The question is has God said it? Was the prophet speaking officially? . . .As to the printed discourses of even leading brethren, the same principle holds. They do not constitute the court of ultimate appeal on doctrine. They may be very useful in the way of elucidation and are very generally good and sound in doctrine, but they are not the ultimate sources of the doctrines of the Church, and are not binding upon the Church. The rule in that respect is | :It is not sufficient to quote sayings purported to come from Joseph Smith or Brigham Young upon matters of doctrine. Our own people also need instruction and correction in respect of this. It is common to hear some of our older brethren say, ‘But I heard Brother Joseph myself say so,’ or ‘Brother Brigham preached it; I heard him.’ But that is not the question. The question is has God said it? Was the prophet speaking officially? . . .As to the printed discourses of even leading brethren, the same principle holds. They do not constitute the court of ultimate appeal on doctrine. They may be very useful in the way of elucidation and are very generally good and sound in doctrine, but they are not the ultimate sources of the doctrines of the Church, and are not binding upon the Church. The rule in that respect is—What God has spoken, and what has been accepted by the Church as the word of God, by that, and that only, are we bound in doctrine.{{ref|roberts2}} | ||
Leaders of the Church even spoke out against those who might try to think that some other standard applied for ‘official’ Church doctrine: | Leaders of the Church even spoke out against those who might try to think that some other standard applied for ‘official’ Church doctrine: | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
One Bible commentator noted that the Biblical authors were not perfect, and that they made errors of expression even in the Biblical record: | One Bible commentator noted that the Biblical authors were not perfect, and that they made errors of expression even in the Biblical record: | ||
:Though purified and ennobled by the influence of His Holy Spirit; men each with his own peculiarities of manner and disposition—each with his own education or want of education—each with his own way of looking at things—each influenced differently from another by the different experiences and disciplines of his life. Their inspiration did not involve a suspension of their natural faculties; it did not even make them free from earthly passion; it did not make them into machines—it left them men. Therefore we find their knowledge sometimes no higher than that of their contemporaries...{{ref|dummelow1}} | :Though purified and ennobled by the influence of His Holy Spirit; men each with his own peculiarities of manner and disposition—each with his own education or want of education—each with his own way of looking at things—each influenced differently from another by the different experiences and disciplines of his life. Their inspiration did not involve a suspension of their natural faculties; it did not even make them free from earthly passion; it did not make them into machines—it left them men. Therefore we find their knowledge sometimes no higher than that of their contemporaries...{{ref|dummelow1}} | ||
Paul’s accounts even contain a contradictory account of his vision (Compare [http://scriptures.lds.org/acts/9/7#7 Acts 9:7] & [http://scriptures.lds.org/acts/22/9#9 Acts 22:9]). Paul and Barnabas disagreed severely enough for it to disrupt their missions [http://scriptures.lds.org/acts/15/36#39 Acts 15:36-39]. Peter and Paul also criticized the other’s writing [http://scriptures.lds.org/2_pet/3/16#16 2 Peter 3:16] and | Paul’s accounts even contain a contradictory account of his vision (Compare [http://scriptures.lds.org/acts/9/7#7 Acts 9:7] & [http://scriptures.lds.org/acts/22/9#9 Acts 22:9]). Paul and Barnabas disagreed severely enough for it to disrupt their missions [http://scriptures.lds.org/acts/15/36#39 Acts 15:36-39]. Peter and Paul also criticized the other’s writing [http://scriptures.lds.org/2_pet/3/16#16 2 Peter 3:16] and behavior regarding the Church [http://scriptures.lds.org/gal/2/11#16 Galatians 2:11-16]. | ||
===Protection against error=== | ===Protection against error=== | ||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
Dallin H. Oaks explained how the Lord allows all His children to grow through struggling with problems: | Dallin H. Oaks explained how the Lord allows all His children to grow through struggling with problems: | ||
:Revelations from God . . . are not constant. We believe in continuing revelation, not continuous revelation. We are often left to work out problems without the dictation or specific direction of the Spirit. That is part of the experience we must have in mortality. Fortunately, we are never out of our Savior's sight, and if our judgment leads us to actions beyond the limits of what is permissible and if we are listening, . . . the Lord will restrain us by the promptings of his Spirit. | :Revelations from God . . . are not constant. We believe in continuing revelation, not continuous revelation. We are often left to work out problems without the dictation or specific direction of the Spirit. That is part of the experience we must have in mortality. Fortunately, we are never out of our Savior's sight, and if our judgment leads us to actions beyond the limits of what is permissible and if we are listening, . . . the Lord will restrain us by the promptings of his Spirit. | ||
The Lord will not help his children avoid all stumbling and error; He will protect them from | The Lord will not help his children avoid all stumbling and error; He will protect them from permanent harm to His work, as Boyd K. Packer taught: | ||
:...even with the best of intentions, [Church government] does not always work the way it should. Human nature may express itself on occasion, but ''not to the permanent injury of the work''.{{ref|packer1}} | :...even with the best of intentions, [Church government] does not always work the way it should. Human nature may express itself on occasion, but ''not to the permanent injury of the work''.{{ref|packer1}} | ||
Does this mean that members must simply have | Does this mean that members must simply have "blind trust" in their leaders? Hardly, says President Lorenzo Snow: | ||
:There may be some things that the First Presidency do; that the Apostles do, that cannot for the moment be explained; yet the spirit, the motives that inspire the action can be understood, because each member of the Church has a right to have that measure of the Spirit of God that they can judge as to those who are acting in their interests or otherwise...{{ref|snow1}} | :There may be some things that the First Presidency do; that the Apostles do, that cannot for the moment be explained; yet the spirit, the motives that inspire the action can be understood, because each member of the Church has a right to have that measure of the Spirit of God that they can judge as to those who are acting in their interests or otherwise...{{ref|snow1}} | ||
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
The prophets are not perfect, but they are called of God. They may speak as men, but may speak scripture as well. Every person may know for themselves whether they speak the truth through the same power that their revelation is given: the power of the Holy Ghost. | The prophets are not perfect, but they are called of God. They may speak as men, but may speak scripture as well. Every person may know for themselves whether they speak the truth through the same power that their revelation is given: the power of the Holy Ghost. | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
#{{note|by1}} {{JoD13|author=Brigham Young|title=Latter-Day Saint Families, etc.|date=2 January 1870|start=95|end=95}} | #{{note|by1}} {{JoD13|author=Brigham Young|title=Latter-Day Saint Families, etc.|date=2 January 1870|start=95|end=95}} | ||
#{{note|by2}} {{JoD13|author=Brigham Young|title=Texts for Preaching Upon at Conference—Revelations, etc.|date=6 October 1870|start=264|end=264}} | #{{note|by2}} {{JoD13|author=Brigham Young|title=Texts for Preaching Upon at Conference—Revelations, etc.|date=6 October 1870|start=264|end=264}} | ||
#{{note|roberts2}} | #{{note|roberts2}} B.H. Roberts, ''Deseret News'' (23 July 1921) sec. 4: 7. | ||
#{{note|seer1}} Proclamation of the First Presidency and Twelve, dated 21 October 1865, re: The Seer. Printed in ''Messages of the First Presidency,'' edited by James R. Clark, Vol. 2, (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965), 238–239. | #{{note|seer1}} Proclamation of the First Presidency and Twelve, dated 21 October 1865, re: The Seer. Printed in ''Messages of the First Presidency,'' edited by James R. Clark, Vol. 2, (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965), 238–239. | ||
#{{note|jfs1}} Joseph Fielding Smith, ''Doctrines of Salvation,'' comp. Bruce R. McConkie, 3 vols., (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954–56), 3:203-204. | #{{note|jfs1}} Joseph Fielding Smith, ''Doctrines of Salvation,'' comp. Bruce R. McConkie, 3 vols., (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954–56), 3:203-204. | ||
| Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
#{{note|snow1}} {{CR1|author=Lorenzo Snow|article=A Serious ordeal, etc.|date=October 1898|start=54}} | #{{note|snow1}} {{CR1|author=Lorenzo Snow|article=A Serious ordeal, etc.|date=October 1898|start=54}} | ||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
===FAIR wiki articles=== | ===FAIR wiki articles=== | ||
*[[Adam-God]] | *[[Adam-God]] | ||
*[[Fallibility of prophets]] | *[[Fallibility of prophets]] | ||
===FAIR web site=== | ===FAIR web site=== | ||
*FAIR Topical Guide: [http://www.fairlds.org/apol/ai082.html Infallibility] | *FAIR Topical Guide: [http://www.fairlds.org/apol/ai082.html Infallibility] | ||
*FAIR Topical Guide: [http://www.fairlds.org/apol/ai258.html Personal beliefs of prophets] | *FAIR Topical Guide: [http://www.fairlds.org/apol/ai258.html Personal beliefs of prophets] | ||
===External links=== | ===External links=== | ||
*W. John Walsh, Joseph Fielding McConkie, and Jeff Lindsay, [http://www.lightplanet.com/mormons/basic/organization/priesthood/prophets/FAQ_Infallibility.htm "Are Prophets Infallible?"] | *W. John Walsh, Joseph Fielding McConkie, and Jeff Lindsay, [http://www.lightplanet.com/mormons/basic/organization/priesthood/prophets/FAQ_Infallibility.htm "Are Prophets Infallible?"] | ||
*Bruce R. McConkie, [http://home.uchicago.edu/~spackman/human.pdf "Are the General Authorities Human?"], address at the LDS Institute of Religion at the University of Utah, 28 October 1966. | *Bruce R. McConkie, [http://home.uchicago.edu/~spackman/human.pdf "Are the General Authorities Human?"], address at the LDS Institute of Religion at the University of Utah, 28 October 1966. | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
===Printed material=== | ===Printed material=== | ||
*Printed resources whose text is not available online | *Printed resources whose text is not available online | ||
--> | --> | ||
Revision as of 20:32, 26 November 2005
Criticism
Critics are fond of imposing their absolutist assumptions on the Church. Many critics hold inerrantist beliefs about scriptures or prophets, and assume that the LDS have similar views.
Critics therefore insist—without reason—that any statement by any LDS Church leader represents LDS doctrine, and something believed by a given member.
Response
Prophets in the LDS tradition are not "infallible"
The LDS do not believe that prophets and apostles are incapable of error, despite being called of God and receiving revelation. Joseph Smith himself taught that ‘a prophet was a prophet only when he was acting as such’.[1] The Church has always taught that its leaders are human and subject to failings as are all mortals. Only Jesus was perfect:
- The position is not assumed that the men of the New Dispensation —its prophets, apostles, presidencies, and other leaders—are without faults or infallible, rather they are treated as men of like passions with their fellow men."[2]
Standard of doctrine in Church
President George Q. Cannon [1st counselor to Brigham Young] explained that the scriptures are the only source of official doctrine, coupled with later revelation to the prophets that has been presented to the Church and sustained:
- I hold in my hand the Book of Doctrine and Covenants, and also the book, The Pearl of Great Price, which books contain revelations of God. In Kirtland, the Doctrine and Covenants in its original form, as first printed, was submitted to the officers of the Church and the members of the Church to vote upon. As there have been additions made to it by the publishing of revelations which were not contained in the original edition, it has been deemed wise to submit these books with their contents to the conference, to see whether the conference will vote to accept the books and their contents as from God, and binding upon us as a people and as a Church.[3]
B.H. Roberts further explained that only those things within the Standard Works and those presented for a sustaining vote by the First Presidency and Council of the Twelve Apostles is binding upon the Church and its members:
- The Church has confined the sources of doctrine by which it is willing to be bound before the world to the things that God has revealed, and which the Church has officially accepted, and those alone. These would include the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, the Pearl of Great Price; these have been repeatedly accepted and endorsed by the Church in general conference assembled, and are the only sources of absolute appeal for our doctrine.[4]
Anything else is valuable and may be of use for explanation, exhortation, and instruction, but does not bear the weight of ‘scripture’ in the LDS canon. Harold B. Lee was equally explicit:
- If anyone, regardless of his position in the Church were to advance a doctrine that is not substantiated by the standard Church works, meaning the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price, you may know that his statement is merely his private opinion. The only one authorized to bring forth any new doctrine is the President of the Church, who, when he does, will declare it as revelation from God, and it will be so accepted by the Council of the Twelve and sustained by the body of the Church. And if any man speak a doctrine which contradicts what is in the standard Church works, you may know by that same token that it is false and you are not bound to accept it as truth.[5]
Elsewhere, President Lee taught the same principle:
- It is not to be thought that every word spoken by the General Authorities is inspired, or that they are moved upon by the Holy Ghost in everything they speak and write. Now you keep that in mind. I don't care what his position is, if he writes something or speaks something that goes beyond anything that you can find in the standard works, unless that one be the prophet, seer, and revelator—please note that one exception—you may immediately say, "Well, that is his own idea!" And if he says something that contradicts what is found in the standard works (I think that is why we call them "standard"—it is the standard measure of all that men teach), you may know by that same token that it is false; regardless of the position of the man who says it.[6]
Prophets and new scripture
Brigham Young made another statement which critics abuse:
- "Well, brethren and sisters, try and be Saints. I will try; I have tried many years to live according to the law which the Lord reveals unto me. I know just as well what to teach this people and just what to say to them and what to do in order to bring them into the celestial kingdom, as I know the road to my office. It is just as plain and easy. The Lord is in our midst. He teaches the people continually. I have never yet preached a sermon and sent it out to the children of men, that they may not call Scripture. Let me have the privilege of correcting a sermon, and it is as good Scripture as they deserve. The people have the oracles of God continually. In the days of Joseph, revelation was given and written, and the people were driven from city to city and place to place, until we were led into these mountains. Let this [discourse] go to the people with "Thus saith the Lord," and if they do not obey it, you will see the chastening hand of the Lord upon them. But if they are plead with, and led along like children, we may come to understand the will of the Lord and he may preserve us as we desire.[7]
Brigham here says that his remarks are "scripture." However, the critics rarely provide Brigham's own explanation of this comment:
- Brother Orson Hyde referred to a few who complained about not getting revelations. I will make a statement here that has been brought against me as a crime, perhaps, or as a fault in my life. Not here, I do not allude to anything of the kind in this place, but in the councils of the nations—that Brigham Young has said "when he sends forth his discourses to the world they may call them Scripture." I say now, when they are copied and approved by me they are as good Scripture as is couched in this Bible, and if you want to read revelation read the sayings of him who knows the mind of God, without any special command to one man to go here, and to another to go yonder, or to do this or that, or to go and settle here or there.[8]
Brigham Young made it clear that his previous statement should not mean that anything he said was scripture, but only that which he had the opportunity to correct and send to the Saints as scripture. This provides a good example of why this rule exists at all: what a prophet may intend to convey may not be what his listeners hear, or what scribes recorded. Thus, teachings must be approved by the author and submitted as binding scripture in order for them to be considered such.
Establishing new doctrine
- It is not sufficient to quote sayings purported to come from Joseph Smith or Brigham Young upon matters of doctrine. Our own people also need instruction and correction in respect of this. It is common to hear some of our older brethren say, ‘But I heard Brother Joseph myself say so,’ or ‘Brother Brigham preached it; I heard him.’ But that is not the question. The question is has God said it? Was the prophet speaking officially? . . .As to the printed discourses of even leading brethren, the same principle holds. They do not constitute the court of ultimate appeal on doctrine. They may be very useful in the way of elucidation and are very generally good and sound in doctrine, but they are not the ultimate sources of the doctrines of the Church, and are not binding upon the Church. The rule in that respect is—What God has spoken, and what has been accepted by the Church as the word of God, by that, and that only, are we bound in doctrine.[9]
Leaders of the Church even spoke out against those who might try to think that some other standard applied for ‘official’ Church doctrine:
- The Seer [a magazine published by a Church leader] "contain[s] doctrines which we cannot sanction, and which we have felt impressed to disown, so that the Saints who now live, and who may live hereafter, may not be misled by our silence, or be left to misinterpret it…It ought to have been known, years ago, by every person in the Church—for ample teachings have been given on the point—that no member of the Church has the right to publish any doctrines, as the doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, without first submitting them for examination and approval to the First Presidency and the Twelve. There is but one man upon the earth, at one time, who holds the keys to receive commandments and revelations for the Church, and who has the authority to write doctrines by way of commandment unto the Church. And any man who so far forgets the order instituted by the Lord as to write and publish what may be termed new doctrines, without consulting with the First Presidency of the Church respecting them, places himself in a false position, and exposes himself to the power of darkness by violating his Priesthood. While upon this subject, we wish to warn all the Elders of the Church, and to have it clearly understood by the members, that, in the future, whoever publishes any new doctrines without first taking this course, will be liable to lose his Priesthood.[10]
Later leaders of the Church have continued to teach this principle. Joseph Fielding Smith wrote:
- It makes no difference what is written or what anyone has said, if what has been said is in conflict with what the Lord has revealed, we can set it aside. My words, and the teachings of any other member of the Church, high or low, if they do not square with the revelations, we need not accept them. Let us have this matter clear. We have accepted the four standard works as the measuring yardsticks, or balances, by which we measure every man¹s doctrine. You cannot accept the books written by the authorities of the Church as standards of doctrine, only in so far as they accord with the revealed word in the standard works. Every man who writes is responsible, not the Church, for what he writes. If Joseph Fielding Smith writes something which is out of harmony with the revelations, then every member of the Church is duty bound to reject it. If he writes that which is in perfect harmony with the revealed word of the Lord, then it should be accepted.[11]
Biblical standard?
Some critics will protest that this standard is not applied to Biblical prophets, but this comes from a superficial analysis of the Biblical record:
One Bible commentator noted that the Biblical authors were not perfect, and that they made errors of expression even in the Biblical record:
- Though purified and ennobled by the influence of His Holy Spirit; men each with his own peculiarities of manner and disposition—each with his own education or want of education—each with his own way of looking at things—each influenced differently from another by the different experiences and disciplines of his life. Their inspiration did not involve a suspension of their natural faculties; it did not even make them free from earthly passion; it did not make them into machines—it left them men. Therefore we find their knowledge sometimes no higher than that of their contemporaries...[12]
Paul’s accounts even contain a contradictory account of his vision (Compare Acts 9:7 & Acts 22:9). Paul and Barnabas disagreed severely enough for it to disrupt their missions Acts 15:36-39. Peter and Paul also criticized the other’s writing 2 Peter 3:16 and behavior regarding the Church Galatians 2:11-16.
Protection against error
The Church's system of councils provides protection against the fallibility of a single man or leader. President Smith explained:
- An individual may fall by the wayside, or have views, or give counsel which falls short of what the Lord intends. But the voice of the First Presidency and the united voice of those others who hold with them the keys of the kingdom shall always guide the Saints and the world in those paths where the Lord wants them to be.[13]
Dallin H. Oaks explained how the Lord allows all His children to grow through struggling with problems:
- Revelations from God . . . are not constant. We believe in continuing revelation, not continuous revelation. We are often left to work out problems without the dictation or specific direction of the Spirit. That is part of the experience we must have in mortality. Fortunately, we are never out of our Savior's sight, and if our judgment leads us to actions beyond the limits of what is permissible and if we are listening, . . . the Lord will restrain us by the promptings of his Spirit.
The Lord will not help his children avoid all stumbling and error; He will protect them from permanent harm to His work, as Boyd K. Packer taught:
- ...even with the best of intentions, [Church government] does not always work the way it should. Human nature may express itself on occasion, but not to the permanent injury of the work.[14]
Does this mean that members must simply have "blind trust" in their leaders? Hardly, says President Lorenzo Snow:
- There may be some things that the First Presidency do; that the Apostles do, that cannot for the moment be explained; yet the spirit, the motives that inspire the action can be understood, because each member of the Church has a right to have that measure of the Spirit of God that they can judge as to those who are acting in their interests or otherwise...[15]
Conclusion
The prophets are not perfect, but they are called of God. They may speak as men, but may speak scripture as well. Every person may know for themselves whether they speak the truth through the same power that their revelation is given: the power of the Holy Ghost.
Endnotes
- [note] Joseph Smith, History of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 7 volumes, edited by Brigham H. Roberts, (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1957), 5:265. Volume 5 link
- [note] James R. Clark, quoting B. H. Roberts, Messages of the First Presidency, edited by James R. Clark, Vol. 4, (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1970), quoting B. H. Roberts, xiv - p.xv.
- [note] George Q. Cannon, ""Title"," Millennial Star 42 (15 November 1880), 724. (10 October 1880, General Conference)
- [note] Brigham H. Roberts, sermon of 10 July 1921, delivered in Salt Lake Tabernacle, printed in Deseret News (23 July 1921) sec. 4: 7.
- [note] Harold B. Lee, The First Area General Conference for Germany, Austria, Holland, Italy, Switzerland, France, Belgium, and Spain of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, held in Munich Germany, August 24-26, 1973, with Reports and Discourses, 69).
- [note] Harold B. Lee, "The Place of the Living Prophet, Seer, and Revelator," Address to Seminary and Institute of Religion Faculty, BYU, 8 July 1964.
- [note] Brigham Young, "Latter-Day Saint Families, etc.," Journal of Discourses, reported by D.W. Evans and John Grimshaw, (2 January 1870), Vol. 13 (London: Latter-day Saint's Book Depot, 1871), 95–95.off-site
- [note] Brigham Young, "Texts for Preaching Upon at Conference—Revelations, etc.," Journal of Discourses, reported by D.W. Evans and John Grimshaw, (6 October 1870), Vol. 13 (London: Latter-day Saint's Book Depot, 1871), 264–264.off-site
- [note] B.H. Roberts, Deseret News (23 July 1921) sec. 4: 7.
- [note] Proclamation of the First Presidency and Twelve, dated 21 October 1865, re: The Seer. Printed in Messages of the First Presidency, edited by James R. Clark, Vol. 2, (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965), 238–239.
- [note] Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, comp. Bruce R. McConkie, 3 vols., (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954–56), 3:203-204.
- [note] James R. Dummelow, A Commentary on the Holy Bible : complete in one volume, with general articles (New York : Macmillan, 1984[1904]), cxxxv.
- [note] Joseph Fielding Smith, "Eternal Keys and the Right to Preside," Ensign (July 1972): 88.*
- [note] Dallin H. Oaks, "Teaching and Learning by the Spirit," Ensign (March 1997): 14.*
- [note] Boyd K. Packer, "I Say unto You, Be One," in BYU Devotional and Fireside Speeches, 1990-1991 (Provo, Utah: University Publications, 1991), 84.
- [note] Lorenzo Snow, "A Serious ordeal, etc.," in Conference Report (October 1898), 54.
Further reading
FAIR wiki articles
FAIR web site
- FAIR Topical Guide: Infallibility
- FAIR Topical Guide: Personal beliefs of prophets
External links
- W. John Walsh, Joseph Fielding McConkie, and Jeff Lindsay, "Are Prophets Infallible?"
- Bruce R. McConkie, "Are the General Authorities Human?", address at the LDS Institute of Religion at the University of Utah, 28 October 1966.