|
|
Line 20: |
Line 20: |
| |L14=Question: Is there an "epidemic" of suicide among gay Mormons? | | |L14=Question: Is there an "epidemic" of suicide among gay Mormons? |
| |L15=Question: Why do Mormons typically refer to homosexual/gay/lesbian issues with such terms as "same-sex attraction"? | | |L15=Question: Why do Mormons typically refer to homosexual/gay/lesbian issues with such terms as "same-sex attraction"? |
| | |L16=Question: Are Mormon with same-sex attraction encouraged to be closeted or lie about their attractions? |
| }} | | }} |
| </onlyinclude> | | </onlyinclude> |
Line 63: |
Line 64: |
| {{:Question: Is there an "epidemic" of suicide among gay Mormons?}} | | {{:Question: Is there an "epidemic" of suicide among gay Mormons?}} |
| {{:Question: Why do Mormons typically refer to homosexual/gay/lesbian issues with such terms as "same-sex attraction"?}} | | {{:Question: Why do Mormons typically refer to homosexual/gay/lesbian issues with such terms as "same-sex attraction"?}} |
| | {{:Question: Are Mormon with same-sex attraction encouraged to be closeted or lie about their attractions?}} |
|
| |
|
| {{SummaryItem | | {{SummaryItem |
Line 83: |
Line 85: |
|
| |
|
| {{:Mormonism_and_gender_issues/Same-sex_attraction/Aversion therapy performed at BYU}} | | {{:Mormonism_and_gender_issues/Same-sex_attraction/Aversion therapy performed at BYU}} |
| {{SummaryItem
| | |
| |link=Mormonism and gender issues/Same-sex attraction/Honesty
| |
| |subject=Are members with same-sex attraction encouraged to be closeted or lie about their attractions?
| |
| |summary=Member with same-sex attractions are not encouraged to lie or hide their sexual attractions or to isolate themselves from others. All members are encouraged to avoid labels and not to identify themselves primarily by their sexual feelings. However, there is a difference between not identifying yourself primarily by your sexual feelings, and being "closeted". A person can be honest, share their feelings with others and be comfortable with who they are, including their sexuality, while still realizing that they are first and foremost a child of God.
| |
| }}
| |
| {{SummaryItem | | {{SummaryItem |
| |link=Mormonism and gender issues/Same-sex attraction/Denial | | |link=Mormonism and gender issues/Same-sex attraction/Denial |
Jump to details:
Gordon B. Hinckley,
Ensign, (Nov 1999)
I emphasize this, I wish to say that our opposition to attempts to legalize same-sex marriage should never be interpreted as justification for hatred, intolerance, or abuse of those who profess homosexual tendencies, either individually or as a group. As I said from this pulpit one year ago, our hearts reach out to those who refer to themselves as gays and lesbians. We love and honor them as sons and daughters of God. They are welcome in the Church. It is expected, however, that they follow the same God-given rules of conduct that apply to everyone else, whether single or married.
Dallin H. Oaks,
Ensign, (Oct 1995)
[W]e should always distinguish between sinful acts and inappropriate feelings or potentially dangerous susceptibilities. We should reach out lovingly to those who are struggling to resist temptation. The First Presidency did this in their 14 November 1991 letter. After reaffirming the sinful nature of “fornication, adultery, and homosexual and lesbian behavior,” the Presidency added: “Individuals and their families desiring help with these matters should seek counsel from their bishop, branch president, stake or district president. We encourage Church leaders and members to reach out with love and understanding to those struggling with these issues. Many will respond to Christlike love and inspired counsel as they receive an invitation to come back and apply the atoning and healing power of the Savior.
Joshua Johanson,
Proceedings of the 2012 FAIR Conference, (August 2012)
There is a labyrinth surrounding homosexuality that is becoming increasingly difficult to navigate. More and more it seems the two sides are talking past each other. I chose the title of Navigating the Labyrinth Surrounding Homosexual Desire because I think understanding the difference between having same-sex attractions and having homosexual desires is key to understanding how to navigate this labyrinth.
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Summary: In his article in the
Encyclopedia of Mormonism, James T. Duke explains the LDS doctrine on this subject: "People who live a worthy life but do not marry in the temples, for various reasons beyond their control, which might include not marrying, not having heard the gospel, or not having a temple available so that the marriage could be sealed for eternity, will at some time be given this opportunity. Latter-day Saints believe it is their privilege and duty to perform these sacred ordinances vicariously for deceased progenitors, and for others insofar as possible."
Summary: On October 10, 2010, President Boyd K. Packer of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles spoke during the Church's semi-annual general conference. Portions of President Packer's talk caused a firestorm of protest and, often, misrepresentation. This article examines President Packer's address, and compares it to past talks given by President Packer. As will be seen, President Packer's address has been misunderstood and misrepresented.
- Critics' tactics—
Brief Summary: Given that same-sex attraction is a charged issue with political overtones, it is not surprising that some sincerely misunderstood President Packer's talk. Just as there are those who could sincerely misunderstand President Packer's talk, there are those who choose, for whatever reason, to purposely misunderstand. (Click here for full article)
∗ ∗ ∗
Jump to details:
Summary: Critics argue that in order to be happy and healthy, a person with same-sex attraction needs to identify as gay and have a same-sex relationship. The church encourages members to view themselves as sons and daughters of God, and discourages any identity that interferes with that identity. Members who refer to themselves as straight, gay or lesbian are free to go on as all other members, but are advised not to identify themselves primarily by their sexual feelings.
Summary: What have past and present Church leaders taught about the distinction (if any) between sexual temptations, desires, feelings, or inclinations, and sexual acts?
Summary: Does the church allow people with same-sex attraction to associate with each other?
Summary: Some critics have asserted that our stance on same-sex relationships are not substantiated by the teachings of Christ during his mortal minstry. This is not the case. Christ taught a very strict law for sexual morality. He taught against sexual relationships outside of marriage and that marriage was between a man and a woman. While he did not specifically teach against the modern concept of same-sex relationships, he was clear that the only legitimate expression of sexuality was in a marriage between a man and woman.
Summary: While the law of Moses was fulfilled in Christ, Christ specifically taught against fornication and adultery, which would include same-sex relationships. After Peter received a vision that the law of Moses had been fulfilled, the prohibition against fornication remained intact.
Summary: It is claimed that Joseph Smith and other nineteenth century Mormons were not strenuously opposed to same-sex acts or intimacy, and that the modern Church's opposition to homosexual conduct is a later aberration. Historian D. Michael Quinn's book, Same-Sex Dynamics Among Nineteenth-Century Americans: A Mormon Example is almost solely responsible for this claim. Quinn's methodology and conclusions are shoddy, and have been severely criticized by LDS and non-LDS historians.
Summary: An examination and comparison of the differences between the way the Church approaches same-sex attraction as opposed to the Priesthood ban.
Summary: An examination and comparison of the differences between the way the Church approaches same-sex attraction as opposed to plural marriage.
Summary: The passage of California Proposition 8 during the November 2008 election has generated a number of criticisms of the Church regarding a variety of issues including the separation of church and state, the Church's position relative to people who experience same-sex attraction, accusations of bigotry by members, and the rights of a non-profit organization to participate in the democratic process on matters not associated with elections of candidates.