
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-== ==\n +)) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{IndexClaim\n\|claim=\n\*(.*)\n\|response=\n +{{IndexClaimItemShort\n|title={{check}}\n|claim=\1\n}}\n)) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
====241-248==== | ====241-248==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=William Clayton and plural marriage | |||
}} | |||
*[[Polygamy/William Clayton]] | *[[Polygamy/William Clayton]] | ||
*{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}} | *{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}} | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
====243==== | ====243==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=The book speculates that John Bennett's marriage record "may have been deleted" after his disagreement with Joseph Smith. | |||
}} | |||
*No evidence that Bennett's relationships were ever sanctioned. | *No evidence that Bennett's relationships were ever sanctioned. | ||
*[[Polygamy book/John C. Bennett|John C. Bennett]] | *[[Polygamy book/John C. Bennett|John C. Bennett]] | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
====244==== | ====244==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=The book speculates that Joseph and Clayton were "conspiring to alter" his wife's "marital status." | |||
}} | |||
*[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language|Loaded and prejudicial language]] | *[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language|Loaded and prejudicial language]] | ||
*[[Polygamy/William Clayton]] | *[[Polygamy/William Clayton]] | ||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
====245==== | ====245==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=Joseph instructed Clayton to send for Sarah Crookes, a close female friend he had known in England, to which Clayton replied that “nothing further than an attachment such as a brother and sister in the Church might rightfully entertain for each other” occurred between them. “But in fact,” G. D. Smith editorializes darkly, “Clayton’s journal recorded the depth of emotional intimacy he had shared with her." | |||
}} | |||
*[[Polygamy/William Clayton]] | *[[Polygamy/William Clayton]] | ||
*{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}} | *{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}} | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
====245==== | ====245==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim={{AuthorQuote|"…instead of waiting for [Sarah’s] arrival, [Clayton] married his legal wife’s sister Margaret on April 27. This was before Sarah’s ship had even set sail from England."}} | |||
}} | |||
*The author strives to paint Clayton as unfaithful to both his first wife (having already had an inappropriate level of emotional intimacy with another woman and the woman against whom he "conspired" with Joseph. | *The author strives to paint Clayton as unfaithful to both his first wife (having already had an inappropriate level of emotional intimacy with another woman and the woman against whom he "conspired" with Joseph. | ||
*{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}} | *{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}} | ||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
====247==== | ====247==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=The author states that William Clayton's journal " disclosed his own extracurricular romances." | |||
}} | |||
*[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language|Loaded and prejudicial language]] | *[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language|Loaded and prejudicial language]] | ||
*[[Polygamy/William Clayton]] | *[[Polygamy/William Clayton]] | ||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
====247==== | ====247==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=The author then describes Clayton’s 1853 mission to England, during which, “instead of persuading the flock of the correctness of [polygamy], Clayton contributed to defections and was personally suspected of ‘having had unlawful intercourse with women.’” | |||
}} | |||
*Two hundred pages later, we learn that this suspicion was only because of his [Clayton’s] “discussion of plural marriage” (p. 445), and his [Smith’s] own introduction to Clayton’s journals tell us that the charge was actually raised by an “apostate Mormon,” whom Clayton claimed had maliciously distorted his words, leading to what he called his life’s most painful experience. <ref>Smith, ''Intimate Chronicle'', xlix, 488–489, 490 n. 444.</ref> | *Two hundred pages later, we learn that this suspicion was only because of his [Clayton’s] “discussion of plural marriage” (p. 445), and his [Smith’s] own introduction to Clayton’s journals tell us that the charge was actually raised by an “apostate Mormon,” whom Clayton claimed had maliciously distorted his words, leading to what he called his life’s most painful experience. <ref>Smith, ''Intimate Chronicle'', xlix, 488–489, 490 n. 444.</ref> | ||
*[[Polygamy/William Clayton]] | *[[Polygamy/William Clayton]] | ||
Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
====249==== | ====249==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim={{AuthorQuote|"The prophet went on to ask Benjamin [F. Johnson] for his sister Almera [in plural marriage], provoking his protégé to comment that if Smith did anything to 'dishonor or debauch his sister, he would have Benjamin to contend with. As Smith casually deflected this threat, his 'eye did not move from mine,' Johnson reported."}} | |||
}} | |||
*The author downplays Benjamin's actual threat: | *The author downplays Benjamin's actual threat: | ||
:"Brother Joseph This is Something I did not Expect & I do not understand it—You know whether it is right. I do not. I want to do just as you tell me, and I will try. But if I [ever] should Know that you do this to Dishonor & debauch my Sister I will kill you as Shure as the Lord lives" | :"Brother Joseph This is Something I did not Expect & I do not understand it—You know whether it is right. I do not. I want to do just as you tell me, and I will try. But if I [ever] should Know that you do this to Dishonor & debauch my Sister I will kill you as Shure as the Lord lives" | ||
Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
====250==== | ====250==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=Benjamin Johnson is said to have been "[i]mpressed by the prophet's inner calm but not fully convinced." | |||
}} | |||
*The author fails to tell us that Joseph promised Benjamin that he would know for himself. He is not impressed by Joseph's calm, but by Joseph's prophetic assurance of revelation directly to Benjamin: | *The author fails to tell us that Joseph promised Benjamin that he would know for himself. He is not impressed by Joseph's calm, but by Joseph's prophetic assurance of revelation directly to Benjamin: | ||
:"But.how I asked. Can I teach my Sister when I mYself do not understand…'But you will See & underStand it' he Said and when you open your mouth to talk to your Sister light will come to you & your mouth will be full. & your toung lose." | :"But.how I asked. Can I teach my Sister when I mYself do not understand…'But you will See & underStand it' he Said and when you open your mouth to talk to your Sister light will come to you & your mouth will be full. & your toung lose." | ||
Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
====252==== | ====252==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=The author claims that Joseph "was able to wrap himself in the authority of the Bible…." | |||
}} | |||
*Joseph appealed to Biblical models, but always insisted that his authority was his own, from God, not derived from a Bible reading. | *Joseph appealed to Biblical models, but always insisted that his authority was his own, from God, not derived from a Bible reading. | ||
*[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language|Loaded and prejudicial language]] | *[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language|Loaded and prejudicial language]] | ||
Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
}} | }} | ||
====252==== | ====252==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=The author speculates: "In a theological explication, perhaps partly inspired by convenience, Smith saw the church hierarchy as an extended family that would continue to live together in an afterlife community." | |||
}} | |||
*The author here suggests that Joseph's motivations were mercenary and pragmatic, rather than of sincere conviction. Smith ignores the literature on Joseph's deep-felt need and commitment to binding friendship in his personal life and theology. <ref>Steven Epperson, ""The Grand, Fundamental Principle": Joseph Smith and the Virtue of Friendship," ''Journal of Mormon History'' 23/2 (Fall 1997): 81-101. See also {{s||DC|84|63,77-78}}, {{s||DC|88|3-4,62,113,117}}, {{s||DC|93|51}}, {{s||DC|94|1}}, {{s||DC|97|1}}, {{s||DC|100|1}}, {{s||DC|103|1}}, {{s||DC|104|1}}, {{s||DC|105|26}}, {{s||DC|109|6}}, {{s||DC|121|9-10}}, {{s||DC|125|25}}, {{s||JS-H|1|28}}.</ref> Such a pervasive theme in his personal and scriptural writing argues against "convenience" as his motivation. | *The author here suggests that Joseph's motivations were mercenary and pragmatic, rather than of sincere conviction. Smith ignores the literature on Joseph's deep-felt need and commitment to binding friendship in his personal life and theology. <ref>Steven Epperson, ""The Grand, Fundamental Principle": Joseph Smith and the Virtue of Friendship," ''Journal of Mormon History'' 23/2 (Fall 1997): 81-101. See also {{s||DC|84|63,77-78}}, {{s||DC|88|3-4,62,113,117}}, {{s||DC|93|51}}, {{s||DC|94|1}}, {{s||DC|97|1}}, {{s||DC|100|1}}, {{s||DC|103|1}}, {{s||DC|104|1}}, {{s||DC|105|26}}, {{s||DC|109|6}}, {{s||DC|121|9-10}}, {{s||DC|125|25}}, {{s||JS-H|1|28}}.</ref> Such a pervasive theme in his personal and scriptural writing argues against "convenience" as his motivation. | ||
*[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language|Loaded and prejudicial language]] | *[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language|Loaded and prejudicial language]] | ||
Line 175: | Line 175: | ||
}} | }} | ||
====259-260==== | ====259-260==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim={{AuthorQuote|"We do not know how long Joseph Smith had been contemplating polygamy, but the earliest conversations in which he explicitly addressed the topic were in late 1840 and early 1841."}} | |||
}} | |||
*Joseph reportedly specifically addressed the matter in the first half of the 1830s. | *Joseph reportedly specifically addressed the matter in the first half of the 1830s. | ||
*[[Polygamy_book/Initiation of the practice|Initiation of the practice]] | *[[Polygamy_book/Initiation of the practice|Initiation of the practice]] | ||
Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
}} | }} | ||
====263 n. 54==== | ====263 n. 54==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=The author quotes Ann Eliza Young regarding events that happened in 1842: "She wrote that some of the events she related depended upon the 'experience of those so closely connected with me that they have fallen directly under my observation.'" | |||
}} | |||
*Ann Eliza Young was born in 1844 in Nauvoo. It is thus impossible for her to have been a witness of events in 1842. | *Ann Eliza Young was born in 1844 in Nauvoo. It is thus impossible for her to have been a witness of events in 1842. | ||
|response= | |response= | ||
Line 196: | Line 196: | ||
====274==== | ====274==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=John C. Bennett is claimed to have "publicized Young's clumsy attempt to entice [Martha] Brotherton" into plural marriage. | |||
}} | |||
*The author again tacitly assumes that Bennett's account is reliable and truthful. | *The author again tacitly assumes that Bennett's account is reliable and truthful. | ||
*[[Polygamy book/John C. Bennett|John C. Bennett]] | *[[Polygamy book/John C. Bennett|John C. Bennett]] | ||
Line 206: | Line 206: | ||
}} | }} | ||
====276==== | ====276==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=Brigham Young is claimed to have had an "overall materialistic theology." | |||
}} | |||
*[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language|Loaded and prejudicial language]] | *[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language|Loaded and prejudicial language]] | ||
*Compare with a more informed treatment, which displays a proper grasp of the nuances in both Latter-day Saint and non–Latter-day Saint applications of the term, in Bushman, ''Rough Stone Rolling'', 419–21. | *Compare with a more informed treatment, which displays a proper grasp of the nuances in both Latter-day Saint and non–Latter-day Saint applications of the term, in Bushman, ''Rough Stone Rolling'', 419–21. | ||
Line 217: | Line 217: | ||
}} | }} | ||
====277==== | ====277==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=Brigham Young is claimed to have ridiculed geologists who "tell us that this earth has been in existence for thousands and millions of years." | |||
}} | |||
*This is a major misreading of the text. It completely inverts Brigham's meaning. Brigham endorses the idea of an old earth, and criticizes Christian teachers who insist on a young earth. | *This is a major misreading of the text. It completely inverts Brigham's meaning. Brigham endorses the idea of an old earth, and criticizes Christian teachers who insist on a young earth. | ||
*[[Brigham Young/As Young Earth Creationist]] | *[[Brigham Young/As Young Earth Creationist]] | ||
Line 231: | Line 231: | ||
====281==== | ====281==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim={{AuthorQuote|"In part, Smith's organizational labyrinth helped keep the church together…."}} | |||
}} | |||
*[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language|Loaded and prejudicial language]] | *[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language|Loaded and prejudicial language]] | ||
|response= | |response= | ||
Line 240: | Line 240: | ||
}} | }} | ||
====281 and 281 n. 86==== | ====281 and 281 n. 86==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=Brigham Young is claimed to have "worked out a scheme" in which church members were organized into companies of 'tens' and 'fifties'….[footnote] The author then notes that "[t]he first LDS divisions of this kind were in Missouri, where Samson Avard….told men it would soon be their privilege to "….take to yourselves spoils of the goods of the ungodly gentiles." | |||
}} | |||
*The author seems unwilling to let any anti-Mormon trope go unmentioned—we have to have the [[Danites]]! | *The author seems unwilling to let any anti-Mormon trope go unmentioned—we have to have the [[Danites]]! | ||
*Avard has nothing to do with plural marriage, but Smith seems unwilling to let an opportunity to make the Saints look bad pass by. The comment from Avard, without adequate context and an understanding that his teachings were criticized, is prejudicial and misleading. | *Avard has nothing to do with plural marriage, but Smith seems unwilling to let an opportunity to make the Saints look bad pass by. The comment from Avard, without adequate context and an understanding that his teachings were criticized, is prejudicial and misleading. | ||
Line 252: | Line 252: | ||
====282==== | ====282==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim={{AuthorQuote|"a history of the Mormons in the West would be … a history of a mad prophet's visions turned by an American genius into the seed of life."}} | |||
}} | |||
*[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language|Loaded and prejudicial language]] | *[[../../Loaded and prejudicial language|Loaded and prejudicial language]] | ||
|response= | |response= | ||
Line 261: | Line 261: | ||
}} | }} | ||
====285==== | ====285==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim={{AuthorQuote|"When the opposition newspaper appeared and devoted space to polygamy, Smith and the ruling councils had it destroyed."}} | |||
}} | |||
*The author gives the false impression that this destruction was the act of the Church—it was not; it was done by the civil government, including non-Mormons. The "council" was the Nauvoo City council. | *The author gives the false impression that this destruction was the act of the Church—it was not; it was done by the civil government, including non-Mormons. The "council" was the Nauvoo City council. | ||
*Smith also presumes that the concern was only about polygamy. He fails to inform the reader about concerns regarding its libelous nature and consequent risk of mob violence. | *Smith also presumes that the concern was only about polygamy. He fails to inform the reader about concerns regarding its libelous nature and consequent risk of mob violence. | ||
Line 299: | Line 299: | ||
====295==== | ====295==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=The author states that as Nauvoo was gradually depopulated, it became increasingly lawless. | |||
}} | |||
*The lawlessness of Nauvoo was in part due to the collapse of any police force when the Illinois legislature rescinded the Nauvoo charter. | *The lawlessness of Nauvoo was in part due to the collapse of any police force when the Illinois legislature rescinded the Nauvoo charter. | ||
* [[Primary sources/Thomas Kane on the decline of Nauvoo]] | * [[Primary sources/Thomas Kane on the decline of Nauvoo]] | ||
Line 310: | Line 310: | ||
====297==== | ====297==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=It is noted that "Mormons brought about 100 black slaves with them to Deseret, representing two percent of the total population, from 1847 to 1850" and that "[s]lavery and polygamy formed a witch's brew that isolated Deseret from the rest of the U.S. through its territorial period to he 1890s." | |||
}} | |||
<!-- *[[../../Political history claims#Utah slavery alienated the nation]] --> | <!-- *[[../../Political history claims#Utah slavery alienated the nation]] --> | ||
*[[Blacks and the priesthood|Race issues and the Church]] | *[[Blacks and the priesthood|Race issues and the Church]] | ||
Line 331: | Line 331: | ||
====303==== | ====303==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim={{AuthorQuote|"No doubt, [Heber C. Kimball's] hesitation [in further plural marriages] had been similar to Young's, due to the weight of responsibilities involved in running church operations and because of the adverse publicity from Bennett's disclosures."}} | |||
}} | |||
*When the relevant documents are examined, it becomes apparent that Kimball was reluctant to practice plural marriage partly because he knew this was difficult for his first wife, Vilate. <ref>See, for example, Augusta Joyce Crocheron (author and complier), ''Representative Women of Deseret, a book of biographical sketches to accompany the picture bearing the same title'' (Salt Lake City: J. C. Graham & Co., 1884). See also Stanley B. Kimball, "Heber C. Kimball and Family, the Nauvoo Years," ''Brigham Young University Studies'' 15/4 (Summer 1975): 466; citing Heber C. Kimball to Vilate Kimball, 12 February 1849. Original letter formerly in the possession of President Spencer W. Kimball, and now in the Church Historical Department; and Vilate Kimball to Heber C. Kimball, 16 October 1842 as quoted in Helen Mar Whitney, "Scenes and Incidents," 11 (1 June 1882):1-2.</ref> | *When the relevant documents are examined, it becomes apparent that Kimball was reluctant to practice plural marriage partly because he knew this was difficult for his first wife, Vilate. <ref>See, for example, Augusta Joyce Crocheron (author and complier), ''Representative Women of Deseret, a book of biographical sketches to accompany the picture bearing the same title'' (Salt Lake City: J. C. Graham & Co., 1884). See also Stanley B. Kimball, "Heber C. Kimball and Family, the Nauvoo Years," ''Brigham Young University Studies'' 15/4 (Summer 1975): 466; citing Heber C. Kimball to Vilate Kimball, 12 February 1849. Original letter formerly in the possession of President Spencer W. Kimball, and now in the Church Historical Department; and Vilate Kimball to Heber C. Kimball, 16 October 1842 as quoted in Helen Mar Whitney, "Scenes and Incidents," 11 (1 June 1882):1-2.</ref> | ||
*(Smith mentions these documents subsequently on pp. 304-305, but prefaces them by telling the reader that Kimball's hesitation was all about pragmatic or public relations issues. Yet, the documents strongly suggest that personal and family issues occupied much of Heber's concern.) | *(Smith mentions these documents subsequently on pp. 304-305, but prefaces them by telling the reader that Kimball's hesitation was all about pragmatic or public relations issues. Yet, the documents strongly suggest that personal and family issues occupied much of Heber's concern.) | ||
Line 342: | Line 342: | ||
====309==== | ====309==== | ||
{{ | {{IndexClaimItemShort | ||
|claim= | |title={{check}} | ||
|claim=The author speculates that there would have been six plural husbands in Nauvoo by 1842 if John Bennett "had not been expelled…." | |||
}} | |||
*The author again presumes (with no evidence, and against a great deal of [[Polygamy book/John C. Bennett|evidence]]) that Bennett's adulteries were ever sanctioned. | *The author again presumes (with no evidence, and against a great deal of [[Polygamy book/John C. Bennett|evidence]]) that Bennett's adulteries were ever sanctioned. | ||
*[[Polygamy book/John C. Bennett|John C. Bennett]] | *[[Polygamy book/John C. Bennett|John C. Bennett]] |
Chapter 3 (pp. 159-240) | A FAIR Analysis of: Nauvoo Polygamy: "... but we called it celestial marriage", a work by author: George D. Smith
|
Chapter 5 (pp. 325-351) |
William Clayton and plural marriage
|response=
William Clayton (edit)
}}
The book speculates that John Bennett's marriage record "may have been deleted" after his disagreement with Joseph Smith.
|response=
John C. Bennett (edit)
}}
The book speculates that Joseph and Clayton were "conspiring to alter" his wife's "marital status."
|response=
William Clayton (edit)
}}
Joseph instructed Clayton to send for Sarah Crookes, a close female friend he had known in England, to which Clayton replied that “nothing further than an attachment such as a brother and sister in the Church might rightfully entertain for each other” occurred between them. “But in fact,” G. D. Smith editorializes darkly, “Clayton’s journal recorded the depth of emotional intimacy he had shared with her."
|response=
William Clayton (edit)
}}
Author's quote: "…instead of waiting for [Sarah’s] arrival, [Clayton] married his legal wife’s sister Margaret on April 27. This was before Sarah’s ship had even set sail from England."
|response=
William Clayton (edit)
}}
…Clayton wrote on October 19 about needing to protect "the truth" by telling untruths, in this case the strategic charade of publicly rebuking someone while privately embracing them. Clayton wrote about Smith's advice: "Says he[,] just keep her [Margaret, his plural wife] at home and brook it and if they raise trouble about it and bring you before me I will give you an awful scourging and probably cut you off from the church and then I will baptise you and set you ahead as good as ever." [Italics and quotation marks as in The author's original.]
Response
William Clayton (edit)
The author states that William Clayton's journal " disclosed his own extracurricular romances."
|response=
William Clayton (edit)
}}
The author then describes Clayton’s 1853 mission to England, during which, “instead of persuading the flock of the correctness of [polygamy], Clayton contributed to defections and was personally suspected of ‘having had unlawful intercourse with women.’”
|response=
William Clayton (edit)
}}
Author's quote: "The prophet went on to ask Benjamin [F. Johnson] for his sister Almera [in plural marriage], provoking his protégé to comment that if Smith did anything to 'dishonor or debauch his sister, he would have Benjamin to contend with. As Smith casually deflected this threat, his 'eye did not move from mine,' Johnson reported."
|response=
}}
Benjamin Johnson is said to have been "[i]mpressed by the prophet's inner calm but not fully convinced."
|response=
}}
The author claims that Joseph "was able to wrap himself in the authority of the Bible…."
|response=
}}
The author speculates: "In a theological explication, perhaps partly inspired by convenience, Smith saw the church hierarchy as an extended family that would continue to live together in an afterlife community."
|response=
Joseph Smith: cynical motivations (edit)
}}
Author's quote: "We do not know how long Joseph Smith had been contemplating polygamy, but the earliest conversations in which he explicitly addressed the topic were in late 1840 and early 1841."
|response=
}}
The author quotes Ann Eliza Young regarding events that happened in 1842: "She wrote that some of the events she related depended upon the 'experience of those so closely connected with me that they have fallen directly under my observation.'"
|response=
}}
John C. Bennett is claimed to have "publicized Young's clumsy attempt to entice [Martha] Brotherton" into plural marriage.
|response= John C. Bennett (edit)
}}
Brigham Young is claimed to have had an "overall materialistic theology."
|response=
}}
Brigham Young is claimed to have ridiculed geologists who "tell us that this earth has been in existence for thousands and millions of years."
|response=
}}
Author's quote: "In part, Smith's organizational labyrinth helped keep the church together…."
|response=
}}
Brigham Young is claimed to have "worked out a scheme" in which church members were organized into companies of 'tens' and 'fifties'….[footnote] The author then notes that "[t]he first LDS divisions of this kind were in Missouri, where Samson Avard….told men it would soon be their privilege to "….take to yourselves spoils of the goods of the ungodly gentiles."
|response=
}}
Author's quote: "a history of the Mormons in the West would be … a history of a mad prophet's visions turned by an American genius into the seed of life."
|response=
}}
Author's quote: "When the opposition newspaper appeared and devoted space to polygamy, Smith and the ruling councils had it destroyed."
|response=
Nauvoo Expositor (edit)
}}
The author states that as Nauvoo was gradually depopulated, it became increasingly lawless.
|response=
}}
It is noted that "Mormons brought about 100 black slaves with them to Deseret, representing two percent of the total population, from 1847 to 1850" and that "[s]lavery and polygamy formed a witch's brew that isolated Deseret from the rest of the U.S. through its territorial period to he 1890s."
|response=
}}
Author's quote: "No doubt, [Heber C. Kimball's] hesitation [in further plural marriages] had been similar to Young's, due to the weight of responsibilities involved in running church operations and because of the adverse publicity from Bennett's disclosures."
|response=
}}
The author speculates that there would have been six plural husbands in Nauvoo by 1842 if John Bennett "had not been expelled…."
|authorsources=
John C. Bennett (edit)
}}
Notes
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now