Array

Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Nauvoo Polygamy/Assumptions and presumptions: Difference between revisions

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles(.*)}} +))
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Resource Title\|(.*)}} +{{H2\n|L={{check}}\n|H2=\1\n|S=\n|L1=\n}}))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FairMormon}}  
{{FairMormon}}  
{{Resource Title|''Nauvoo Polygamy'': Assumptions and presumptions}}
{{H2
|L={{check}}
|H2=''Nauvoo Polygamy'': Assumptions and presumptions
|S=
|L1=
}}
{{FAIRAnalysisHeader
{{FAIRAnalysisHeader
|title=[[../]]
|title=[[../]]

Revision as of 16:28, 9 June 2017

Nauvoo Polygamy: Assumptions and presumptions




A work by author: George D. Smith

Familiar anti-Mormon arguments

Joseph's guilt is always assumed

Joseph is simply assumed to be guilty of any offense.

  • He is even "haunted by the suspicion, which followed him from place to place, that he crossed moral boundaries in his friendship with other women." (p. 28)
  • In Illinois Joseph "was still hunted by law officials for old offenses." (p. 34)
  • The author assumes that Joseph "went about courting" various women, despite the total lack of evidence that any "courtships" occurred. (p. 54)