Array

Repudiated ideas about race: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
|subject=The "curse of Cain" and "curse of Ham"
|subject=The "curse of Cain" and "curse of Ham"
|summary=
|summary=
|sublink1=Gospel Topics: "Today, the Church disavows the theories advanced in the past that black skin is a sign of divine disfavor or curse, or that it reflects actions in a premortal life; that mixed-race marriages are a sin; or that blacks or people of any other race or ethnicity are inferior in any way to anyone else"
|sublink2=Gospel Topics: "Even after 1852, at least two black Mormons continued to hold the priesthood"
|sublink3=Question: What are the "curse of Cain" and the "curse of Ham"?
|sublink4=Question: When did a biblical curse become associated with the "Hamites?"
|sublink5=Question: When did the "mark of Cain" become associated with black skin?
|sublink6=Question: How did the "curse of Ham" or "curse of Cain" become associated with Mormonism?
|sublink7=Question: Is interracial marriage prohibited or condemned within the Church?
}}
}}
===== =====
===== =====
{{SummaryItem
{{SummaryItem

Revision as of 05:08, 16 April 2017

Repudiated early Mormon teachings regarding race


Ideas related to race that have been repudiated by the Church

Summary: There exist previously taught ideas which have been repudiated by Church leaders since the ban. Among these are the notion that Blacks were somehow not as "valiant" in the pre-existence, and that interracial marriage is forbidden.

Less valiant or neutral in the pre-existence during the "war in heaven"

Summary: It is true that LDS scripture states that those with lighter skin color "are favored because of what they did as spirits in a pre-earth life?" Is it true that some Church leaders taught that people who were born with dark skin were "neutral" in the pre-existence?

The "curse of Cain" and "curse of Ham"

LDS scriptures that were cited in support of the ban



Further reading and additional sources responding to these claims