Array

Doctrine and Covenants/Criticism: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
{{Articles FAIR copyright}}
{{Resource Title|Criticism of the Doctrine and Covenants}}
{{summary}}
<onlyinclude>
<onlyinclude>
{{SummaryHeader
{{SummaryHeader
|link=Doctrine and Covenants/Criticism
|link=Doctrine and Covenants/Criticism
|subject=Criticism of the Doctrine and Covenants
|heading=Criticism of the Doctrine and Covenants
|summary=
|summary=
}}
}}

Revision as of 23:26, 10 May 2017


Criticism of the Doctrine and Covenants

Contradiction between Section 132 and Jacob 2

Summary: Critics note that D&C 132 speaks favorably about some Old Testament practitioners of plural marriage, while Jacob 2 is negative. Some claim that this discrepancy is a contradiction, suggesting that Joseph Smith's ideas about plural marriage changed, and the Book of Mormon and Doctrine and Covenants are not inspired.

D&C 84 states that God cannot be seen without priesthood

Summary: How could Joseph Smith has seen God the Father and Jesus Christ during the First Vision if he had not yet received the priesthood?
Retrieved from "http://104.237.154.152/answers/index.php?title=Doctrine_and_Covenants/Criticism&oldid=156164"