Array

Book of Mormon/Early reactions to: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
{{Articles FAIR copyright}}  
{{Resource Title|Early reactions to the Book of Mormon}}
{{summary}}
<onlyinclude>
<onlyinclude>
==Early reactions to the Book of Mormon==
{{SummaryHeader
|link=
|subject=Early reactions to the Book of Mormon
|summary=The Book of Mormon was met by a storm of criticism from early critics.  This page archives examples of these early responses.
|sublink1=Question: Does the fact that the Bible states that nothing should be "added to" or "taken away" from the book mean that the Book of Mormon is false?
}}
</onlyinclude>
 
 


The Book of Mormon was met by a storm of criticism from early critics.  This page archives examples of these early responses.
{{:Book_of_Mormon/Early_reactions_to/Joseph_Smith_the_author}}
{{:Book_of_Mormon/Early_reactions_to/Joseph_Smith_the_author}}


===Other early reaction to the Book of Mormon===


{{SummaryItem
{{SummaryItem

Revision as of 15:24, 17 May 2017


[[|Early reactions to the Book of Mormon]]

Summary: The Book of Mormon was met by a storm of criticism from early critics. This page archives examples of these early responses.



Book of Mormon/Early reactions to/Joseph Smith the author


"Adding to or taking away"

Summary: Bible forbids "adding to or taking away" from God's word

New revelation not necessary

Summary: It is claimed that new revelation is blasphemous or unnecessary

Clumsy or obvious forgery

Summary: It is claimed that the Book of Mormon is a clumsy or obvious forgery

Grammar and spelling errors

Summary: Complaints about grammar, spelling, or style.

Heretical

Summary: Claims that the existence of the Book of Mormon marks members of the Church as Christian heretics

KJV plagiarism?

Summary: Plagiarized from the King James Bible

Sidney Rigdon

Summary: Claims that Sidney Rigdon had major role in authorship

Lazy Smiths?

Summary: Claims that the Smith family was lazy

Spalding theory

All "interested," so not to be trusted

All related, so not to be trusted

Character assaults

Spiritual or literal?

Summary: Did not literally see plates/angel?

Marin Harris and spiritual eyes

"Supernatural"


Notes