FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Array
Criticism of Mormonism/Books/One Nation Under Gods/Index: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
|sublink8=Response to claim: 15 - Why does the 1832 account omit information about "God condemning Christian churches as corrupt?" | |sublink8=Response to claim: 15 - Why does the 1832 account omit information about "God condemning Christian churches as corrupt?" | ||
|sublink9=Response to claim: 16 - Did LDS leaders only begin teaching that Joseph saw both Jesus and God the Father in the 1870s-80s? | |sublink9=Response to claim: 16 - Did LDS leaders only begin teaching that Joseph saw both Jesus and God the Father in the 1870s-80s? | ||
|sublink10=Response to claim: 16-17 - | |sublink10=Response to claim: 16-17 - Orson Pratt said that the two personages that appeared to Joseph in the First Vision were angels | ||
|sublink11=Response to claim: 17 - Why did Church historian Andrew Jenson say that "The angel again forbade Joseph to join any of these churches?" | |sublink11=Response to claim: 17 - Why did Church historian Andrew Jenson say that "The angel again forbade Joseph to join any of these churches?" | ||
|sublink12=Response to claim: 18 - Why does John Taylor only call the Father and Son "two glorious personages" in 1850 without mentioning the phrase "this is my beloved son?" | |sublink12=Response to claim: 18 - Why does John Taylor only call the Father and Son "two glorious personages" in 1850 without mentioning the phrase "this is my beloved son?" | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
|sublink16=Response to claim: 22, 490 n.78 (HB) - Didn't Lucy Mack Smith say that the first vision was that of a "holy Angel"? | |sublink16=Response to claim: 22, 490 n.78 (HB) - Didn't Lucy Mack Smith say that the first vision was that of a "holy Angel"? | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== ==== | ==== ==== | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
Revision as of 05:24, 1 February 2015
Index to claims made in One Nation Under Gods
| Overview | A FAIR Analysis of: One Nation Under Gods A work by author: Richard Abanes
|
Use of sources |
...after seven years, FAIR has been able to raise only twenty-seven objections to a book weighing in at 651 pages (471 pages of main text + nearly 150 pages of endnotes + bibliography + indexes). Particularly interesting is how most these so-called errors-mistakes (minus the ones too petty to even address) have all been resolved in the paperback version.
—The author, posted on his website "ERRATA FOR ONE NATION UNDER GODS" (Dec. 2008)
Page-by-page responses to claims made in One Nation Under Gods
Summary: FairMormon's original review of One Nation Under Gods was of the original 2002 hardback edition. The author has responded that there were editorial problems with this edition. We acknowledge that corrections were made in the paperback edition released in 2003 in response to some of the original reviews. Consequently, all previous FairMormon reviews have been edited for accuracy and tone, and the paperback edition of this work has been evaluated on its own merits. (It should be noted that the corrected paperback edition bears no markings indicating that it is a second edition or an updated edition; it simply appears as a paperback edition of the original.) This is an index of claims made in this work with links to corresponding responses. An effort has been made to provide the author's original sources where possible. In the subarticles linked below the hardback edition is represented by "HB" and the paperback edition by "PB."