Array

Website reviews/Mormon Stories: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles Header 10}} +\n<onlyinclude>))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}}  
<onlyinclude>
{{Resource Title|Responses to <em>Mormon Stories</em> and <em>Open Stories Foundation</em>}}
{{Resource Title|Responses to <em>Mormon Stories</em> and <em>Open Stories Foundation</em>}}
{{FAIRAnalysisHeader
{{FAIRAnalysisHeader

Revision as of 18:26, 2 June 2017


Responses to Mormon Stories and Open Stories Foundation


A FAIR Analysis of:
Mormon Stories and Open Stories Foundation
A work by author: John Dehlin, et al.

Reviews of this website or organization

Articles which respond to specific questions or criticism

Ad hominem case study: An attempt to portray Dan Peterson as dishonest and possibly mentally ill

Summary: John Dehlin attempts to portray Dan Peterson as dishonest and possibly mentally ill

Ad hominem case study: An attempt to dismiss Rosalynde Welch because of who she is related to

Summary: John Dehlin attempts to dismiss Rosalynde Welch because her father-in-law is Jack Welch, founder of FARMS.
  • Click here to see FairMormon Answers to specific issues raised by this work or source's podcast.