|
|
| (14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Denton 42
| | #REDIRECT [[Question: Did Colonel Thomas Kane attempt to cover up the Mountain Meadows Massacre?]] |
| | |
| * The author blames Col. Thomas Kane for helping to cover up the Massacre.
| |
| ||
| |
| * "The claim that Kane was responsible for covering up the massacre (p. 47) finds no support in history, nor does Denton cite primary sources for her view other than Kane's participation in advising Young to respond to federal inquiries in 1858 (p. 208). As I point out in my review of Bagley's Blood of the Prophets, the massacre investigation spanned decades and involved sitting presidents, cabinet members, attorneys general, federal district attorneys, federal marshals, territorial marshals, and more. Kane was out of the picture shortly after the massacre."{{ref|kane.coverup}}
| |
| | |
| Denton 176, 180====
| |
| ||
| |
| *Colonel Thomas Kane is portrayed as arrogant, effeminate, a hypochondriac, and with delusions of fame.
| |
| ||
| |
| * {{Presentism}}: "Denton's discussion of Kane is mercilessly out of context. Biographies and journals of nineteenth-century 'Renaissance' men reveal that many accomplished men adopted what appear today to be affectations of self-importance and prolixity. Stenhouse, no advocate of Brigham Young nor necessarily fair with his sources when discussing Mormonism, treated Kane respectfully in his nineteenth-century work, ''Rocky Mountain Saints''. Stenhouse tells us that 'in the relations of Col. Kane with the Mormons at that time, there was exhibited evidence of the highest Christian charity and personal heroism of character.'"{{ref|kane.1}}
| |
| | |
| #{{note|kane.coverup}} {{FR-16-1-9}}<!--Crockett on Denton-->
| |
| #{{note|kane.1}} {{FR-16-1-9}}<!--Crockett on Denton-->
| |
| | |
| [[Mountain Meadows Massacre/Thomas Kane|Kane helped cover-up?]]
| |
