Array

Question: Does the mistaken "discovery" of cold fusion by Pons and Fleishman in Utah reflect on Mormon gullibility, inability to do science, or dishonesty?: Difference between revisions

m (RogerNicholson moved page Mormonism and science/Alleged "discovery" of cold fusion by Utah researchers to [[Question: Does the mistaken "discovery" of cold fusion by Pons and Fleishman in Utah reflect on Mormon gullibility, inability to do science,...)
mNo edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FME-Source}}
{{FairMormon}}
<onlyinclude>
<onlyinclude>
===Question: Does the mistaken "discovery" of cold fusion by Pons and Fleishman in Utah reflect on Mormon gullibility, inability to do science, or dishonesty?===
==Question: Does the mistaken "discovery" of cold fusion by Pons and Fleishman in Utah reflect on Mormon gullibility, inability to do science, or dishonesty?==
====Neither Pons or Fleishman is LDS, and the University of Utah is not controlled or owned by the Church====
===Neither Pons or Fleishman is LDS, and the University of Utah is not controlled or owned by the Church===


The so-called "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion#Fleischmann-Pons_announcement cold fusion]" was reported by Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischman at the University of Utah on 23 March 1988.  Neither Pons or Fleishman is LDS, and the University of Utah is not controlled or owned by the Church.
The so-called "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion#Fleischmann-Pons_announcement cold fusion]" was reported by Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischman at the University of Utah on 23 March 1988.  Neither Pons or Fleishman is LDS, and the University of Utah is not controlled or owned by the Church.
Line 8: Line 8:
This is often an attempt to [[Logical_fallacies#Poisoning_the_well|poison the well]] via [[Logical_fallacies#Guilt_by_association|guilt by association]].
This is often an attempt to [[Logical_fallacies#Poisoning_the_well|poison the well]] via [[Logical_fallacies#Guilt_by_association|guilt by association]].


In this case, however, the charge is problematic, since neither researcher or their institution had anything to do with "Mormonism."
In this case, however, the charge is problematic, since neither researcher or their institution had anything to do with "Mormonism."</onlyinclude>


</onlyinclude>
 
{{Critical sources box:Mormonism and science/Alleged "discovery" of cold fusion by Utah researchers/CriticalSources}}
{{endnotes sources}}
{{endnotes sources}}
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
<!—PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE 
<!—PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE 
[[en:Question: Does the mistaken "discovery" of cold fusion by Pons and Fleishman in Utah reflect on Mormon gullibility, inability to do science, or dishonesty?]]

Latest revision as of 03:23, 1 May 2024


Question: Does the mistaken "discovery" of cold fusion by Pons and Fleishman in Utah reflect on Mormon gullibility, inability to do science, or dishonesty?

Neither Pons or Fleishman is LDS, and the University of Utah is not controlled or owned by the Church

The so-called "cold fusion" was reported by Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischman at the University of Utah on 23 March 1988. Neither Pons or Fleishman is LDS, and the University of Utah is not controlled or owned by the Church.

This is often an attempt to poison the well via guilt by association.

In this case, however, the charge is problematic, since neither researcher or their institution had anything to do with "Mormonism."


Source(s) of the criticism
Critical sources
  • John L. Brooke, The Refiner's Fire: The Making of Mormon Cosmology, 1644-1844 (Cambridge University Press, 1996), 299.

Notes


<!—PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE 