Array

Question: Does the repudiation of a doctrine that was once taught by a prophet mean that that prophet is now considered a "heretic"?: Difference between revisions

m (→‎top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}})
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FME-Source
{{Main Page}}
|title=Question: Does the repudiation of a doctrine that was once taught by a prophet mean that that prophet is now considered a "heretic"?
|category=Prophets
}}
<onlyinclude>
<onlyinclude>
==Question: Does the repudiation of a doctrine that was once taught by a prophet mean that that prophet is now considered a "heretic"?==
==Question: Does the repudiation of a doctrine that was once taught by a prophet mean that that prophet is now considered a "heretic"?==
Line 10: Line 7:
</onlyinclude>
</onlyinclude>
{{endnotes sources}}
{{endnotes sources}}
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]


[[en:Question: Does the repudiation of a doctrine that was once taught by a prophet mean that that prophet is now considered a "heretic"?]]
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Significa eso que el profeta es ahora considerado un "hereje" el repudio de una doctrina que una vez fue enseñado por un profeta?]]
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Significa eso que el profeta es ahora considerado un "hereje" el repudio de una doctrina que una vez fue enseñado por un profeta?]]
[[pt:Pergunta: Será que a rejeição de uma doutrina que foi ensinada por um profeta significa que tal profeta é agora considerado "herético"?]]
[[pt:Pergunta: A rejeição a uma doutrina que fora antes ensinada por um profeta significa que aquele profeta é agora considerado um "herege?"]]
[[Category:Questions]]

Latest revision as of 21:20, 13 April 2024


Question: Does the repudiation of a doctrine that was once taught by a prophet mean that that prophet is now considered a "heretic"?

If a doctrine that was once taught by a past prophet is rejected by a later prophet, we do not consider the earlier prophet to be a "heretic": We simply consider him to be human

Certain doctrines that applied to 19th-Century and 20th-Century Latter-day Saints were indeed later repudiated. If a doctrine that was once taught by a past prophet is rejected by a later prophet, we do not consider the earlier prophet to be a "heretic": We simply consider him to be human. For example, Brigham Young taught Adam-God and "blood atonement," yet we do not today consider Brigham to be a heretic. We simply disregard those teachings which have been repudiated. Any Latter-day Saint who attends church will be fully aware that Brigham Young is not considered to be a heretic.


Notes