Array

Source:Bradshaw:Defining Adultery:Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FME-Source
#REDIRECT[[Was the practice of polygamy against the law in Illinois in the 1840s?]]
|title=M. Scott Bradshaw: "Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844"
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
|category=Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal
 
}}
[[es:Fuente:Bradshaw:Defining Adultery:José Smith no podría haber sido condenado adecuadamente de adulterio bajo la ley de Illinois en 1844]]
<onlyinclude>
==M. Scott Bradshaw: "Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844"==
M. Scott Bradshaw:
<blockquote>
Joseph Smith could not have been properly convicted of adultery under the law of Illinois in 1844. Illinois law only criminalized adultery or fornication if it was "open". Had Joseph lived to face trial on this charge, he would have had good reason to expect acquittal because his relationships with his plural wives were not open, but were kept confidential and known by a relative few. Given a fair trial on this indictment, Joseph could have relied on several legal defenses.<ref name="defining">{{Article:Bradshaw:Defining Adultery/Full title|pages=}}</ref>{{Rp|402}}
</blockquote>
</onlyinclude>
{{endnotes sources}}

Latest revision as of 03:09, 18 May 2024

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "http://104.237.154.152/answers/index.php?title=Source:Bradshaw:Defining_Adultery:Joseph_Smith_could_not_have_been_properly_convicted_of_adultery_under_the_law_of_Illinois_in_1844&oldid=259080"