Array

Talk:Mormonism and the nature of God/"Celestial sex": Difference between revisions

(sex is not icky)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 20:30, 16 May 2012

Nathan000000: I'm wondering if we should add somewhere in this article the point that sex is not icky. That is, even if Mormons believed that holy, divine beings participated in sexual intimacy, why would that be bad? Jesus Christ ate fish as a resurrected being; eating is not icky. If sex is sacred and lovely and pure and wonderful between two married mortals, why is it necessarily bad between two divine spouses?

Of course there's no need to press the point. But might it be worth pointing out that the burden of proof is on critics to demonstrate that sexual intimacy is incompatible with a holy being?