Array

Mormonism and Wikipedia/First Vision: Difference between revisions
m (→‎top: bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}})
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
{{Main Page}}
{{H2
|L=Mormonism and Wikipedia/First Vision
|H=An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"
|S=
|L1=
}}
{{FAIRAnalysisWikipedia
{{FAIRAnalysisWikipedia
|title=An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"
|title=An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"
Line 6: Line 12:
|section=
|section=
|previous=
|previous=
|next=[[../Joseph Smith, Jr.|Joseph Smith, Jr.]]
|next=[[../Joseph Smith, Jr.]]
|notes={{WikipediaDisclaimer}}
|notes={{WikipediaDisclaimer}}
}}
}}


{{CriticalWorkInfobox
={{WikipediaUpdate|9/17/2011}}=
|title=Wikipedia article "First Vision"
 
|type=Website
{{SummaryItem
|author=Controlling editors [[John Foxe]] (primary), [[COgden]] (secondary)
|link=/Story of the vision
|affiliation=LDS (COgden); Free Presbyterian (Foxe)
|subject=Story of the vision
|accuracy=Excessive amounts of original research based upon synthesis of primary source material. Negative aspects emphasized, with positive aspects subdued, relegated to footnotes, or omitted.
|summary=
|templecontent=None
}}
{{SummaryItem
|link=/Background in the supernatural
|subject=Background in the supernatural
|summary=
}}
{{SummaryItem
|link=/Dating the First Vision
|subject=Dating the First Vision
|summary=
}}
{{SummaryItem
|link=/Recorded accounts of the vision
|subject=Recorded accounts of the vision
|summary=
}}
{{SummaryItem
|link=/Interpretations and responses to the vision
|subject=Interpretations and responses to the vision
|summary=
}}
}}
=An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision" (Version January 2010)=
{{Epigraph|"First Vision packs a lot more punch in a shorter amount of space..." Yes it does, John Foxe, because it is an anti-mormon tract written in the modern style. Today, the 'rant' of an older style tract would make most people's eyes roll, they wouldn't give it a moment's consideration. However, the First Vision article presents the anti-mormon POV in a scholarly tone. It criticizes without ever explicitly stating a criticism. It keeps certain things hidden in the dark. It is sly, sneaky, and underhanded. It reads like an anti-mormon tract written by Eddie Haskell after he went to graduate school. To use your own word John Foxe, it is 'foxey'. <br>Editor "74s181" (26 August 2007) {{link|url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:First_Vision/Archive_7#Similar_'Good_Article'_example}} }}
{{parabreak}}
The following sub-articles analyze sections of the Wikipedia "First Vision" article as it existed in September 2009. We do not address the introductory section. The sections examined are the following:
*[[/Story of the vision|Story of the vision]]
*[[/Background in the supernatural|Background in the supernatural]]
*[[/Dating the First Vision|Dating the First Vision]]
*[[/Recorded accounts of the vision|Recorded accounts of the vision]]
*[[/Interpretations and responses to the vision|Interpretations and responses to the vision]]
==Further reading==
{{MormonismAndWikipedia}}
{{suggestions}}

Latest revision as of 12:17, 15 May 2024

An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"



A FairMormon Analysis of Wikipedia: An analysis of Wikipedia article "First Vision"
 A work by a collaboration of authors (Link to Wikipedia article here) 		Mormonism and Wikipedia/Joseph Smith, Jr.
The name Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.. Wikipedia content is copied and made available under the GNU Free Documentation License.

 Updated 9/17/2011

Story of the vision

Background in the supernatural

Dating the First Vision

Recorded accounts of the vision

Interpretations and responses to the vision

Retrieved from "http://104.237.154.152/answers/index.php?title=Mormonism_and_Wikipedia/First_Vision&oldid=258289"