Array

Mormon responses to atheism: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
|H=Mormon responses to atheism
|H=Mormon responses to atheism
|S=These articles give different responses to criticisms of Latter-day Saint theology from the standpoint of religious skepticism, agnosticism, and atheism.
|S=These articles give different responses to criticisms of Latter-day Saint theology from the standpoint of religious skepticism, agnosticism, and atheism.
|L1=The Latter-day Saint Response to W.K. Chesterton on Epistemic Responsibility
|L1=The Latter-day Saint Response to W.K. Clifford on Epistemic Responsibility
}}
}}
{{:Mormonism/Atheism/Epistemic Responsibility}}
{{:Mormonism/Atheism/Epistemic Responsibility}}

Revision as of 08:23, 9 June 2022


Mormon responses to atheism

Summary: These articles give different responses to criticisms of Latter-day Saint theology from the standpoint of religious skepticism, agnosticism, and atheism.


Jump to Subtopic:

The Latter-day Saint Response to W.K. Clifford on Epistemic Responsibility

Summary: This article gives an overview of English mathematician and philosopher W.K. Clifford's contribution of epistemic responsibility within the philosophy of religion, ethics, and epistemology as well as the Latter-day Saint response to it.


Jump to details:


Subjective revelation

Summary: Critics complain that the LDS appeal to "revelation" or a "burning in the bosom" is subjective, emotion-based, and thus unreliable and susceptible to self-deception. Sectarian critics also belittle appeals to spiritual experiences, comparing them to "warm fuzzies," or merely something "felt by simply watching a Hollywood movie."

Jump to Subtopic:

Atheism